[2nd try] busybox: config options and purpose of subpackages

2011-02-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
[Resending my email from Dec-2010. What I'd want to get is some unification and review of config options enabled, but the main question actually is: who maintains busybox nowadays? Thanks!] Hello. I wonder who/how decides to enable/disable various config options in the 3 different flavours

Re: [2nd try] busybox: config options and purpose of subpackages

2011-02-14 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:37, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: [Resending my email from Dec-2010.  What I'd want to get  is some unification and review of config options enabled,  but the main question actually is: who maintains busybox  nowadays?  Thanks!] Debian Installer Team.

Re: [2nd try] busybox: config options and purpose of subpackages

2011-02-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:19:02PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:37, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: Regular deb and static flavours are linked against libm - for two applets, awk and dc (FEATURE_AWK_LIBM and FEATURE_DC_LIBM).  Is this really necessary

busybox: config options and purpose of subpackages

2010-12-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hello. I wonder who/how decides to enable/disable various config options in the 3 different flavours of busybox packages. There are a lot of differences between the configs which - in my opinion - should not be there. For example: md5sum -c (check) is enabled for udeb flavour, but not for