True. But -v is specified by SuS and is in the Austin Draft. Incidentally,
the command type is also specified by the two documents.
`type' is X/Open, no?
Perhaps Debian policy should be revised to require support
for SuS instead of POSIX.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`command'
if (command -v chmod /dev/null 21) ; then
chmod go-w /foobar
else
echo 'your system is broken' 21
exit 1
fi
its a shell builtin mandated by posix.
version of busybox is 0.61-1
command is mandated.
command -v is optional.
Therefore the above snippet
Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
command is mandated.
command -v is optional.
Therefore the above snippet might echo
'your system is broken' on a POSIX-compliant
system.
True. But -v is specified by SuS and is in the Austin Draft. Incidentally,
the command type is also specified by
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
removing ar along i imagine would not gain very much, but then again
we need every byte we can get.
For the current set of busybox applets, I've made a best guess as
to what is likely to be needed. If somone can find some
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
I consider it a full replacement, and with have now had several releases
with the busybox ash shell. There are no known bugs...
heres one, command is not implemented (its posix last i checked).
this breaks yabootconfig, ybin,
On Mon Sep 03, 2001 at 04:48:03AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
I consider it a full replacement, and with have now had several releases
with the busybox ash shell. There are no known bugs...
heres one, command is not
On Mon Sep 03, 2001 at 01:47:47AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
removing ar along i imagine would not gain very much, but then again
we need every byte we can get.
For the current set of busybox applets, I've made a best
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
I just did a quick check -- disabling both dirname and basename will
save exactly 256 bytes on x86. Worth it?
yes, we need every byte we can get. powerpc binaries are always
larger then i386 anyway, and we are really hurting.
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:16:17AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
On Mon Sep 03, 2001 at 04:48:03AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
I consider it a full replacement, and with have now had several releases
with the busybox ash
The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
looking at busybox there is plenty of bloat that can be removed, i was
able to bring /bin/busybox (current 0.61-1) down from 200792 bytes to
153088, a nearly 47k decrease.
i have
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:04:22 -0800
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
looking at busybox there is plenty of bloat that can be removed, i was
able to bring /bin/busybox (current
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 06:37:20 +1000
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox
by
about 6.5kB (by my calculations),
My caclulations were wrong, it will only save 3.5kB, still i think its
better to use dpkg-deb as it should
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:37:20AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox by
about 6.5kB (by my calculations), one of the reasons being that most of
the busybox unarchiving applets have been reorganised, however tar hasnt
been,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:45:41AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 06:37:20 +1000
Glenn McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox
by
about 6.5kB (by my calculations),
My caclulations were wrong, it will
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
Did you use mklibs.sh or mklibs.py? If the former try the later.
And please, if mklibs.py doesn't work send me a logfile with verry
verbose
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we can also save about 10 or 12k using the ash udeb as its compiled
-Os instead of -O2.
Actually, most of the saving only applies to i386 as it comes from
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),i386)
OPTSM += \
-malign-loops=0 -malign-jumps=0
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
Did you use mklibs.sh or mklibs.py? If the former try the later.
whatever
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:30:07AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we can also save about 10 or 12k using the ash udeb as its compiled
-Os instead of -O2.
Actually, most of the saving only applies to i386 as it comes from
my figures are from a powerpc,
On Sun Sep 02, 2001 at 04:53:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:37:20AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox by
about 6.5kB (by my calculations), one of the reasons being that most of
the busybox
19 matches
Mail list logo
