Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of
> > making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it?
> >
> > Is this forthcoming? It's sta
On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of
> making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it?
>
> Is this forthcoming? It's starting to be a bother not to have it...
Hmm. Did I for
I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of
making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it?
Is this forthcoming? It's starting to be a bother not to have it...
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
3 matches
Mail list logo