Re: busybox for b-f yet?

2001-02-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of > > making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it? > > > > Is this forthcoming? It's sta

Re: busybox for b-f yet?

2001-01-29 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 02:57:44AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of > making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it? > > Is this forthcoming? It's starting to be a bother not to have it... Hmm. Did I for

busybox for b-f yet?

2001-01-28 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I note that in busybox_0.49pre-1 we still don't yet have a means of making the various symlinks to busybox stuff. Or am I just missing it? Is this forthcoming? It's starting to be a bother not to have it... -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email