Package: libtextwrap
Version: 0.1-12
Severity: serious
libtextwrap1-udeb is compressed with bzip2, which is illegal for all udebs.
This one is in the initrd, so nothing explodes in real use, but that doesn't
make it legal.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
reassign 642657 bzip2
thanks
Quoting Mirosław Zalewski (mini...@gmail.com):
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.05
Severity: wishlist
Today I did fresh install of Squeeze on virtual machine. I used
netinstall package with Internet connection. I installed only base
system and Standard system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 642657 bzip2
Bug #642657 [tasksel] tasksel: Standard task should include bzip2
Bug reassigned from package 'tasksel' to 'bzip2'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 3.05.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
). I had fully localised
system, but it showed english descriptions of packages (e.g. aptitude show).
After tracking that issue, it turned out I was lacking bzip2 package.
Without it, apt ignored i18n/Translation-* files from Debian mirrors,
since they are bziped. After installing bzip2 and 'aptitude
Package: libpng12-0-udeb
Version: 1.2.46-2
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Hi!
As udpkg does not support bzip2 compression, it sounds like a bad idea
to use it for udeb.
It's not a huge deal for libpng12-0-udeb as it is not usually
installed by udpkg, but it looks like a bad idea nonetheless
understand it, the more memory that you allow a PPM
algorithm to use, the more of the file it can check for similar contexts
or come up with better prediction values by checking more of and more in
the file.
Some interesting stuff about bzip2 form:
ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/bzip2/docs/manual_1
Chris Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
bootprep.sh requires bzip2. Should this be in make check? Or should
it just be assumed to be available.
Adding it to Build-Depends: as bzip2 [ppc]
would be nice, and checking for it in make chek would
also be good, if we don't already
bootprep.sh requires bzip2. Should this be in make check? Or should
it just be assumed to be available.
--
*--v- Installing Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 v--*
| http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/installmanual |
| debian-imac (potato): http://debian
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I would suggest you defined what your targetted minimum RAM
requirements are.
I think shooting for anything under 8 mb is unrelaistic. The kernel eats
about 2 mb these days, and trying to squeeze a ram disk and running code
in two more to target 4 mb systems could be hard.
Vaidhyanathan Mayilrangam wrote:
I wonder if we would be having bzip2 or gzip on the boot floppies.. All the
network modules compiled takes about 1.3M, but compresssed with bzip2 , needs
only 435K.. The size of bzip2 + libbz2.so is about 85K.. We can probably do the
same with the initrd image
Hi ,
I wonder if we would be having bzip2 or gzip on the boot floppies.. All the
network modules compiled takes about 1.3M, but compresssed with bzip2 , needs
only 435K.. The size of bzip2 + libbz2.so is about 85K.. We can probably do the
same with the initrd image.. That can save us quite some
11 matches
Mail list logo
