(CCing Martin and Steve as they started this thread privately)
Sorry I did not reply to this sooner, but I was kind of waiting to see if
we would go forward with Beta3 or not...
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 00:26, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
arm/mips/mipsel definitely shouldn't have 2.4 kernels on
* Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-04 00:38]:
arm: footbridge nslu2 rpc s3c2410
And ixp4xx?
Yeah.
Hmmm. Things are more awkward than I expected on the debian-cd end;
the base list of udebs to be installed onto the CDs is generated from
the d-i Packages.gz files in the main archive.
* Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-04 00:51]:
Apart from the fact that mips/mipsel have no 2.6 images in etch, so
doing this right now will cause no kernels to be installed on the CDs
for the weekly/daily etch builds. I'll have to add conditionals into
the generation code to only add
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
d-i's dev todo says that arm/mips* still need changes for debian-cd
but I think this has been done already. Maybe you can check what is
being installed
basically, no 2.4 kernel should be installed; only 2.6
mips should have:
* Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-03 23:05]:
At the moment, the following arches all have 2.4 kernels and bits
going onto the CDs:
...
I can change that quite easily if people desire it. Where's the d-i
TODO? I must have missed it...
I'm talking about
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:26:17AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-03 23:05]:
At the moment, the following arches all have 2.4 kernels and bits
going onto the CDs:
...
I can change that quite easily if people desire it. Where's the d-i
TODO? I must
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:38:52AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hmmm. Things are more awkward than I expected on the debian-cd end;
the base list of udebs to be installed onto the CDs is generated from
the d-i Packages.gz files in the main archive. Once the archive is
updated to not mention the
7 matches
Mail list logo
