Package: installation-reports
Boot method: VirtualBox 7.0.26 using d-i .iso as a Bootable CD-ROM device
Image version:
https://gemmei.ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/trixie_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-trixie-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2025-05-26 21:00 UTC
Machine: VirtualBox, host running on Linux Bo
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:58:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #249313
has caused the Debian Bug report #249313,
regarding [d-i-alpha] debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #283060
has caused the Debian Bug report #283060,
regarding Debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #283116
has caused the Debian Bug report #283116,
regarding Debian Installer Report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #281667
has caused the Debian Bug report #281667,
regarding Debian-Installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #278085
has caused the Debian Bug report #278085,
regarding debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:57:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing old installation report #265793
has caused the Debian Bug report #265793,
regarding debian-installer report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 22:40, Gene Lake wrote:
> Everything went well except the install of GRUB to the root partition.
> I have had this problem installing GRUB with every Debian install I've
> done (using the new installer). The initial attempt always fails. I
> can go back and re-select 'in
Package: installation-reports
Boot method:
downloaded CD
Image version:d/l
from Debian.installer.page daily build of AMD64 netinst.iso dated
04-10-2006
Date:
afternoon on 4-10-2006
Machine:
special order computer from
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:13:53PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Thx for your answer.
No problem with closing the 'bug' since it was only a report. Anyway
I'd like to make a few remarks.
> > * During the installation various messages where shown that several
> > modules could not be loaded. I guess
Your message dated Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:13:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#288974: Debian installer report: i386, d-i RC2, 2004-12-29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux belanna 2.6.9.200501060123 #1 Thu Jan 6 01:51:46 CET 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
(the original kernel was 2.6.8-1-386)
Date:
200
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 08:11:21AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Installing worked fine until the reboot, whereafter it could not find
> > the IDE hard drive. Power-cycling fixed this, so I imagine it is a
> > problem with the power management. Have been recommended to
> Comments/Problems:
> Installing worked fine until the reboot, whereafter it could not find
> the IDE hard drive. Power-cycling fixed this, so I imagine it is a
> problem with the power management. Have been recommended to compile
It's quite likely, yes
> custom kernel with APM, so going to try
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
uname -a:
Date:
Method:
Machine: IBM Thinkpad 570 2644 3AU
Processor: 366 MHz PII
Memory: 128MB
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: Root = 6.1Gb, Swap = 301MB
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O]
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: <2004-11-24>
uname -a:
Date: <2004-11-24>
Method: Install on CD boot.
Machine:
Processor: Pentium-M
Memory: 256MB
Root Device:
Root Size/partition table:
Result of fdisk -l /dev/hda
Disk /dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40007761920
On Monday 22 November 2004 11:10, Chris Lale wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 23:04, Frans Pop wrote:
> > reassign 281924 netcfg
> > severity 281924 minor
> > retitle 281924 Ask for nameservers if missing from DHCP
> > thanks
> >
> > There are probably quite a few of these routers with build-in dhcp
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 23:04, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 281924 netcfg
> severity 281924 minor
> retitle 281924 Ask for nameservers if missing from DHCP
> thanks
>
> There are probably quite a few of these routers with build-in dhcp servers
> around that do not supply nameserver addresses in thei
reassign 281924 netcfg
severity 281924 minor
retitle 281924 Ask for nameservers if missing from DHCP
thanks
There are probably quite a few of these routers with build-in dhcp servers
around that do not supply nameserver addresses in their default
configuration.
Would it be possible to check if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 281924 netcfg
Bug#281924: Debian-installer report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'.
> severity 281924 minor
Bug#281924: Debian-installer report
Severity set to `minor'.
> retitle 28192
- Forwarded message from Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:17:10 +
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#281924: Debian-installer report
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Hello Joey.
On Thu
Chris Lale wrote:
> Perhaps this is an omission rather than an error. I could not install when I
> configured the network
> with DHCP. The installation hung trying to fetch packages from the mirror. I
> suspect this was because
> it had not asked me for my ISP's nameservers.
dhcp should provid
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
15th November 2004,
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/
uname -a: Linux thinkpad 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 16th November 23:31
Method: Boo
> Other thoughts during installation:
>
> - The messages at several stages of the install, that some drivers are
> not available at the moment, are irritating; thought first something
> went wrong.
You were in expert modeyou got the information you implicitely
asked for..:-)
> - Missed an
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041115/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux gw 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Thu Nov 11 12:18:43 EST 2004 i586
GNU/Linux
Date: 16-Nov-2004
Method: Installation from boot cd-rom, booting from Li
isn't
possible.
Because of that I thougt about providing a better debian-installer
report-template webpage:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/report-template.en.html
Is it possible to make this page a form which sends the corresponding email
behind the scenes?
Or could we at least provi
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
23-Oct-2004 23:10
uname -a: Linux konishi 2.4.27-1-k7 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:21:29 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: from Oct 24 18:59:37 to
7 -0300 (BRT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 02:01:27 -0300 (BRT)
From: Jacson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debian-installer report
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary=32346719.1092027687094.JavaMail.nobody.webmail3
Your message dated Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:40:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273024: debian installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: netinst RC1 cd image 23-Sept 2004 0800 CST
uname -a: Linux audit01 2.4.26-1-386 #1 Thu July 22 12:46:23 JST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 23-Sept 2004 0900 CST
Method: CD Image, local CD drive (/dev/hdc)
Machine: Dell Latitude C610 Laptop
Proces
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily build 17 august
uname -a: Linux fozzie 2.4.26-1-generic #1 Tue Aug 3 22:46:34 CEST 2004 alpha GNU/Linux
Date: 20 August 2004
Method:
Netinst CD then packages from mirror
Machine: Alpha PC164SX
Processor: PCA56
Memory
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: rc1, downloaded from ftp.au.debian.org.
uname -a: Linux metebelis 2.4.26-r4k-ip22 #1 Sun Jul 18 20:49:31 UTC 2004
mips GNU/Linux
Date: Sun Aug 15, 5pm GMT+10
Method: Installed over a serial console (no keyboard or mo
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: "sarge-i386-1-20040807.iso" of size 678461440 bytes from
www.debian.org, downloaded at 2004-08-14.
uname -a: Linux starfall 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-15.
Method: Boot from iso, i
Subject: debian-installer: report on laptop HP nc6000
From: mario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:47:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.92.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-
mario wrote:
> :02:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme
> BCM5705M_2 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 03)
> The module tg3 supports the Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5705M_2 Gigabit NIC,
> but it was not loaded automatically. Once selected manually from the
> module list which d-i showed me
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004-08-07 around 15:00 CEST netinst from
cdimage.debian.org/cdimage-testing/daily/i386
uname -a: Linux phonic 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-08-07 around 15:30 CEST
Method: booted from netinst CD. No p
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 08/08/2004 got image from www.debian.org
uname -a: Linux SpaceTop 2.6.7 #2 SMP Sun Aug 8 19:37:43 BRT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Aug 8 14:00 +/-
Method: I had install through cd net-inst with my ADSL connection at home no pro
L PROTECTED]>; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:34:33 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Gahide_J=E9r=F4me?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian installer report
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:34:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:07:38AM -0400, Joshua Wise wrote:
> When I went to install the base system, I ran out of room on the
> compactflash. This is understandable - after all, it is only 128MB.
> I'm not quite certain why we are installing exim or other things like
> it by default, however. Exi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 01 July 2004 10:41 am, Joey Hess wrote:
> Joshua Wise wrote:
> > Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"
> Define "current" with an URL please.
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-
Joshua Wise wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"
Define "current" with an URL please.
> When I went to detect the hard drives using the netboot stuff, the modules for
> IDE were not there. This does not seem like a sane default to me.
> Additionally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2004/07/01 0100EDT - netboot images - "current"
uname -a:
Date: 2004/07/01 0155EDT
Method: I netbooted, using network as an installation source and a 128MB CF as
a target.
Machine: VIA EPIA ME
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:26:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#255549: debian-installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/200406018/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(Daily build net install from, June 18, 2004)
uname -a:
Linux deacon 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Da
Hi Martin,
I've download the i386 iso file and test it.
Everything seems to work fine now. I didn't install the system because I
have already installed a testing debian by upgrading a woody.
With the ash shell I didn't found the lspci command.
So I run the lsmod and I can see that sk98lin is l
* Gahide Jérôme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 12:34]:
> When I try to partition my HDD, the installer do not want to lunch,
> and when I want to mount existing partition the installer do
> nothing.Also when I want to load the network module for my
> integrated network card 3com 1000 (module sk98l
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:17:58PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > After this I typed "df" in the console just to see what was happening and I
> > saw that I got about 100 000TB in hard drive and about 6 000TB in an shm
> > partition !!
> When you type "df", you get 1K blocks. So 10 wou
On Sunday 16 May 2004 21:45, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:41]:
> > No there isn't
> > Theres is format, don't format, use as swap, and don't use.
>
> Strange. Which version of debian-installer did you use? Which
> install image?
The one on ftp.crihan
* B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 21:41]:
> No there isn't
> Theres is format, don't format, use as swap, and don't use.
Strange. Which version of debian-installer did you use? Which
install image?
> > When you type "df", you get 1K blocks. So 10 would be 100 MB.
> > Can you s
On Sunday 16 May 2004 20:17, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:20]:
> > Then its comes to partitionning, first the help on lvm isn't
> > translated in french
>
> Which help do you mean?
The one named partitioning drives with partman.
> > Then I couldn't in
* B. Peccatte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-16 19:20]:
> Then its comes to partitionning, first the help on lvm isn't
> translated in french
Which help do you mean?
> Then I couldn't install in lvm because I couldn't find any way to
> create a physical volume. I chose to partition the disk by hand
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 249313 "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#249313: [d-i-alpha] debian-installer report
Changed Bug submitter from Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to "B. Peccatte"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> --
Package: installation-reports
- Forwarded message from "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "B. Peccatte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debian-installer report
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 19:20:12 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
I t
I tried to install an alpha station using the debian installer. Here are the
problems I noticed. Note that I still can't get to the end of the
installation process.
Note that I've got a 1GB hard drive and 72MB of RAM and I'm using the french
translation for installation.
I want to boot from n
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:49:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245077: Debian installer report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 12:55:15PM +0200, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Debian-installer-version: Beta 3, 100 MB CD image, downloaded on 19
> Apr 2004 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
[...]
> I've been having a minor problem though: the GRUB boot screen doesn't
> show any entry for bo
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 3, 100 MB CD image, downloaded on 19
Apr 2004 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a:
Linux pc-ballabio 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 20 Apr 2004 in the morni
1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian Installer report
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_
com.au (unknown [210.8.121.82])
by caffeine.cc.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id B180D1FED1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:27:49 +1000 (EST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 703 invoked by uid 0);
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 03:36:10 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian
Package: Installation-reportsDebian
Installer Version: Beta 3 Floppies (Boot,root and Net-drivers 20040314 from ftp.nz.debian.org)
Date: Midnight 17 March 04 NZDT
Method: boot from locally rewritten floppies -
(tested on an ASUS L3500D - worked fine)
Machine: Acernote Nuovo 970MMX
Processor
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux peanutmuncher 2.4.24-1-686 #1 Wed Feb 18 21:59:13 EST 2004
i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 8 Mar 04, 01:00
Method: booted from the CD on a d
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2 march 2004 rsync://ftp.fsn.hu/cdimages/debian-unofficial/ and ftp.mpi-sb.mpg.deuname -a: Linux(none) 2.4.24-1-386 #1 WED Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686 unknown
Date: 2 march 2004
Method: CD install.
Machine: Personal PC with Asuz KT600
P
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:53:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229423: Debian Installer Report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 02:10:32PM -0500, Nick Fotopoulos wrote:
> First I tried the business card .iso. It seemed to install the base system
> correctly. After choosing a kernel, however, it would return me to choosing
> the kernel again and again. Attempts to choose later options (finish
> con
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta 2, downloaded 1/22/2004 from
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netin
st.iso and
http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-busin
esscard.iso
uname -a: Installation failed.
Christian Perrier wrote:
> OK, now for the report. I will sort this module by module.This is
> INCOMPLETE as I didn't test all d-i modules. I'm not sure of all
> module exact names, so I guess you'll see what I mean.
>
> Some stuff could probably be filed as bugs against the offending
> modules
Op vr 10-10-2003, om 07:59 schreef Christian Perrier:
> I would suggest adopting a policy for the language order. Of course,
> determining the "most important" languages is a very delicate thing as
> everyone would like to have his own language listed on the first page.
>
> Finding a realistic cri
(french speaking people, some translation-related stuff here and
there. Please read if you're interested in d-i translation)
Hi folks,
This mail is an incomplete report of my tests of debian-installer on
my system.
This test was merely for me a very first approach of [d-i] in order to
have a fi
68 matches
Mail list logo
