Hi,
Well, I put the urgency to 'high' with a note in the changelog about the
how and why. So, I do guess this will make it into woody.
Thanks,
Ardo
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:51:03PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Ardo, do you know if that's likely to make it into woody? I would
assume
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:40:19PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
[debiandoc-sgml] now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
(so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
I've no idea about code or what you mean
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 07:40:19PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
[debiandoc-sgml] now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
(so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
I've no idea about code or what you mean by bi-stable, so excuse me if I'm
asking a
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Since there seems to be another new debiandoc-sgml coming, it may take
few more days before new unstable version (1.1.66?) appears into testing.
Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
with known
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 10:59:07PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Some coordinated rebuild activity may be a good idea for document created
with known problematic version (1.1.59).
So far I've only heard about the broken installation documentation in
disks-* directory of the FTP archive, and seen it
Hi,
I just uploaded a new version of debiandoc-sgml which has its urgency set to
high to speed up things. It now builds PDF and PS output in a bi-stable loop
(so various Makefiles can now be cleaned up and bug #134701 is closed).
Thanks,
Ardo
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat,
6 matches
Mail list logo
