Re: debootstrap [fw: [PATCH] using non-standard call to 'head' breaks with busybox]

2001-04-22 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Apr 20, 2001 at 12:58:12PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: I will put it on my TODO list, but its not going to happen for a few weeks... Don't bother. Busybox is not going to support 'tail -#' syntax. Just make sure to use the 'tail -n #' syntax and all is well, -Erik -- Erik B.

Re: debootstrap [fw: [PATCH] using non-standard call to 'head' breaks with busybox]

2001-04-22 Thread Anthony Towns
(Massive Cc's coz that's how mutt defaulted) On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:23:42PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: On Fri Apr 20, 2001 at 12:58:12PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: I will put it on my TODO list, but its not going to happen for a few weeks... Don't bother. Busybox is not going to

Re: debootstrap [fw: [PATCH] using non-standard call to 'head' breaks with busybox]

2001-04-22 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:56:56PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 11:30:25PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: On Thu Apr 19, 2001 at 09:42:33PM -0700, David Whedon wrote: busybox sed doesn't like 'i' option, it likes 'I' though

debootstrap [fw: [PATCH] using non-standard call to 'head' breaks with busybox]

2001-04-19 Thread David Whedon
For your info I just files this one (Bug#94575) against debootstrap. Base install still isn't happenning. -David - Forwarded message from David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: David Whedon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] using non-standard call to 'head' breaks with busybox To:

Re: debootstrap [fw: [PATCH] using non-standard call to 'head' breaks with busybox]

2001-04-19 Thread Glenn McGrath
David Whedon wrote: For your info I just files this one (Bug#94575) against debootstrap. Base install still isn't happenning. -David I havent looked into debootstrap, but from the patch it may be possible to do a cheap busybox implementation of it There are starting to be quite a few