Le Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:22:46PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
Why don't you reassign it then ? You've got luck that I've seen this mail
here ... i'm the submitter and never got a direct answer. :-(
This is #110552 then?
Yes. I cced the bug report on debian-boot without using the
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:32:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:05:02PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
sounds like an excellent reason debootstrap should NOT include
non-free in the list of Packages files it requires.
Ethan, take a pill already. You don't have to
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:05:02PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
sounds like an excellent reason debootstrap should NOT include
non-free in the list of Packages files it requires.
Ethan, take a pill already. You don't have to make every email a flame.
In debian-cd's case, it shouldn't list
Package: deboostrap
Version: 0.1.15.2
Severity: important
I tried a woody cdrom install with the boot floppies 3.0.13 (on i386).
But it failed at the debootstrap stage. The error code returned by
debootstrap was 2 and the error log displayed :
debootstrap: arithmetic expression: syntax error:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:21:36PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:42:27PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Package: deboostrap
Version: 0.1.15.2
Severity: important
I tried a woody cdrom install with the boot floppies 3.0.13 (on i386).
But it failed at the
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:42:27PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Package: deboostrap
Version: 0.1.15.2
Severity: important
I tried a woody cdrom install with the boot floppies 3.0.13 (on i386).
But it failed at the debootstrap stage. The error code returned by
debootstrap was 2 and the
6 matches
Mail list logo
