Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-10 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 06:41:46PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: Thierry Laronde wrote: Yep. There are several ideas in FreeBSD that I do like [I don't know if you remember but last year, there was a thread about the need for a static shell for recovery --- sash ; I have seen that sash is

Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-09 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:00:37PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: If we have a seperate preperation and installation phase then it would make the installer more versatile. The actual installation phase could be much like what debootsrap does, and the preperation stage would involve preparing

Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-09 Thread Glenn McGrath
Thierry Laronde wrote: It could seem that I'm reinventing the wheel, but I have found that even when facing a huge task, it takes me less time to do it by myself than trying to convince others that it is worth working on it /*sigh*/. Yea, i know how you feel, it seems that there are a few of

Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-09 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:08:39AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: Thierry Laronde wrote: BTW, I have designed a new packaging system, with a new package format, that could be a proposal for a common basis for other packaging system. Id be interested in hearing what you have in mind, do

Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-09 Thread David Whedon
There are two things that I would like to see in a new installer that I don't see in debian-installer at the moment: 1. The ability to redo some of the installation after the system is all the way set up. I would like to see the same utility, same user interface, that people can use to modify

Re: di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-08 Thread Tim Middelkoop
I got board one weekend and have done this in a way for debian-linux-i386 and it works quite well. I had initially done a single prep/build environment but it got too messy. The separation of phases helped keep the complexity of both systems down. Phase I is a good rescue environment and

di: seperate preperation and installation phases

2001-05-07 Thread Glenn McGrath
If we have a seperate preperation and installation phase then it would make the installer more versatile. The actual installation phase could be much like what debootsrap does, and the preperation stage would involve preparing an environment for deboostrap to run. The preperation phase could