On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:36:35PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Anthony Towns wrote on Sat Apr 06, 2002 um 10:14:16PM:
Eduard, _no_.
What part of that don't you understand?
The wtf no without any GOOD reasons part.
We want to actually make a release is good enough reason for me.
--
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enabling VGA16 as a module will be done in the next release.
Actually it won't be since vga16 is only modularised in 2.4.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:
#include hallo.h
Herbert Xu wrote on Sat Apr 06, 2002 um 08:53:49PM:
Enabling VGA16 as a module will be done in the next release.
Actually it won't be since vga16 is only modularised in 2.4.
Okay, let's make a summary (+ is pro, - is contra):
- vanilla (2.2.20)
+ known as stable
-
#include hallo.h
Anthony Towns wrote on Sat Apr 06, 2002 um 10:14:16PM:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 02:08:25PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Actually it won't be since vga16 is only modularised in 2.4.
Okay, let's make a summary (+ is pro, - is contra):
Eduard, _no_.
What part of that don't
Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 05:17:57AM +0200 wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:06:19AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vanilla
I got a second, any opposed?
After considering this, I'm opposed.
If the decision is that the default boot floppies for woody
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:31:25PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
the first CD. Is enabling frame-buffer an option on the vanilla
flavor? (Herbert, I cc'd you to get your opinion on that, I don't
Enabling VGA16 as a module will be done in the next release.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! (
6 matches
Mail list logo
