Eduardo Silva wrote:
--- Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Eduardo Silva wrote:
[cut]
Yes :) I think that the creator of the current
look,
Andre Ferreira, may be wanting to do that as well,
but
I think the more icons done, the better :)
I guess you're talking about thes
--- Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Eduardo Silva wrote:
>[cut]
> >
> > Yes :) I think that the creator of the current
> look,
> > Andre Ferreira, may be wanting to do that as well,
> but
> > I think the more icons done, the better :)
>
> I guess you're talking about these icons,
Eduardo Silva wrote:
--- Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Eduardo Silva wrote:
Hi everybody,
In gtk d-i, wouldn't it be better to use size to
differentiate the "sections of text", instead of
using
diffent "shapes"(bold, italic, regular)?
Currently, all the text has the sa
--- Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Eduardo Silva wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> > In gtk d-i, wouldn't it be better to use size to
> > differentiate the "sections of text", instead of
> using
> > diffent "shapes"(bold, italic, regular)?
> >
> > Currently, all the text has the same
Eduardo Silva wrote:
Hi everybody,
In gtk d-i, wouldn't it be better to use size to
differentiate the "sections of text", instead of using
diffent "shapes"(bold, italic, regular)?
Currently, all the text has the same size, and are
differentiated like this (ordered by importance):
"Step" title
Hi everybody,
In gtk d-i, wouldn't it be better to use size to
differentiate the "sections of text", instead of using
diffent "shapes"(bold, italic, regular)?
Currently, all the text has the same size, and are
differentiated like this (ordered by importance):
"Step" title - bold
Question - regul
6 matches
Mail list logo
