Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If we could change the bf-archive install script a little, the amount of files uploaded could be significantly reduced without loosing anything. Currently we build [amiga|atari|mac|*vme*]install.tar.gz files so that potential users have to

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-09 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:46:44PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Yes, it pulls from a archive. I don't know if woody cdrom images are around so I always pull from http.us.debian.org or whatever. I haven't seen any woody images yet, especially not for m68k. Excellent to hear. Are you going

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-08 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:49:15PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please make it very clear,

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please make it very clear, perhaps with subject

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: ROOTCMD := $(shell [ d -u = 0 ] || echo sudo) Guess it will fail when I build as root, and no sudo is installed. Just replace the sudo part by whatever you use

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Besides that m68k suffers from a busybox-linux-2.2 incompatiblity, Richard is working on a fix. I guess I may not tell more right now ;-) Huh, well, be sure to file bugs against busybox if needed. I built a busybox with

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting things going for their architecture

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-07 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS]. I applied the subarch/system

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-06 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Someone is confusing Build-Depends syntax with Depends syntax there. You can't put arch-specifiers in a normal Depends line. You're right, my bad. *blush* Seems to be fixed now anyhow. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onshored.com/

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-04 Thread Richard Hirst
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:39:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: swapped? You mean when they are set? I guess this is the right patch: Well, I came up with the following, but it does affect things other than m68k so should not be applied without careful consideration. OTOH, there where

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-04 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS]. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]URL:http://www.onshored.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-03 Thread Richard Hirst
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:09:11PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting things going

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-03 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For now I've swapped $system for $subarch in rescue.sh and am carrying

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-03 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 02:51:21PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-03 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For now I've swapped $system for $subarch in rescue.sh and am carrying

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-01 Thread David Whedon
Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:09:11PM -0500 wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting things going for their architecture, won't