Bug#784755: marked as done (network-console: Crops password after first space)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:38:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#784755: fixed in network-console 1.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #784755, regarding network-console: Crops password after first space to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#1065675: marked as done (network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:38:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1065675: fixed in network-console 1.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #1065675, regarding network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Bug#784755 marked as pending in network-console

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #784755 [network-console] network-console: Crops password after first space Added tag(s) pending. -- 784755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784755 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#1065675 marked as pending in network-console

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1065675 [src:network-console] network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys Added tag(s) pending. -- 1065675: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065675 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1065675: network-console: Allow ED25519 host keys

Source: network-console Version: 1.93 Severity: wishlist Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: 0cf13...@lf.nx.tc

network-console is marked for autoremoval from testing

network-console 1.88 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183, CVE-2022-28184, CVE-2022-28185, CVE-2022-28191, CVE-2022-28192 https://bugs.debian.org/1011146

Bug#986025: installation-reports: weird characters in network-console

] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: Things worked well, except I switched to network-console and had weird characters instead of line drawing, although both outside and inside were GNU screen in UTF-8 mode. I ended up with a UsrMerge system :( Please make sure that any installation logs

Bug#985950: network-console: Should tell user to disable public key auth when having too many ssh private keys

Package: network-console Severity: normal Tags: d-i Hi, I had trouble connecting to the installer because my ssh client was trying to authenticate using all of my ssh private keys before password auth. As i had too many keys, this lead to a "Too many authentication failures" messag

Bug#843348: marked as done (Network-console ssh session closes immediately)

Your message dated Fri, 7 Aug 2020 23:44:04 +0200 with message-id <20200807234404.35e377ed8bc47c218bcf5...@mailbox.org> and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 4 has caused the Debian Bug report #843348, regarding Network-console ssh session closes immed

Bug#931310: network-console: It isn't possible to preseed network-console/login

Package: network-console Severity: normal Tags: d-i Answering network-console/login causes network-console to exit immediately upon login. Steps to reproduce: 1. Include the following in a preseed.cfg: d-i anna/choose_modules string network-console d-i network-console/login string Start

Re: Failed password for installer on debian Buster netboot whenenable network-console password

tml before I > sent this email about network-console/password. Don't worry about it, I'm glad that we have multiple people spotting issues for one thing, and that we also get a confirmation the fix is working. :) (Feel free to look at the list next time if you wish, but it can be high t

Re: Failed password for installer on debian Buster netboot whenenable network-console password

Cyril, Yes, an updated netboot file from https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/ is okay. Thanks. Sorry, I should read debian-boot mailing lists on https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2019/05/threads.html before I sent this email about network-console/password. >Hopefu

Re: Failed password for installer on debian Buster netboot when enable network-console password

: > > 4.file /etc/passwd content: > root:*:0:0:root:/:/bin/sh > installer:x:0:0:installer:/:/bin/network-console > sshd:*:100:65534::/run/sshd:/bin/false Hopefully this was fixed yesterday: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1039088/accepted-network-console-181-source-into-unst

Failed password for installer on debian Buster netboot when enable network-console password

/network-console sshd:*:100:65534::/run/sshd:/bin/false 5.file /preseed.cfg content(replaced ip address and password) d-i anna/choose_modules string network-console d-i preseed/early_command string anna-install network-console d-i network-console/password password mypassword d-i network-console

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Dear Cyril, Am 02.05.19 um 10:32 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Control: tag -1 patch pending that sounds good… > Control: reassign -1 network-console > > […] > > It seems crypt() is no longer declared as it used to, and we get > implicit function declaration warnings from gcc,

Bug#927516: marked as done (Updating the network-console Uploaders list)

Your message dated Thu, 02 May 2019 08:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#927516: fixed in network-console 1.81 has caused the Debian Bug report #927516, regarding Updating the network-console Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#928299: marked as done (installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible)

Your message dated Thu, 02 May 2019 08:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#928299: fixed in network-console 1.81 has caused the Debian Bug report #928299, regarding installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible to be marked as done. This means

Bug#926947: marked as done (d-i.debian.org: Setting the 'd-i network-console/password password' preseed variable doesn't change password of 'installer' user)

Your message dated Thu, 02 May 2019 08:48:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#926947: fixed in network-console 1.81 has caused the Debian Bug report #926947, regarding d-i.debian.org: Setting the 'd-i network-console/password password' preseed variable doesn't change password

Processed: Re: Bug#926947: d-i.debian.org: Setting the 'd-i network-console/password password' preseed variable doesn't change password of 'installer' user

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - d-i + patch pending Bug #926947 [d-i.debian.org] d-i.debian.org: Setting the 'd-i network-console/password password' preseed variable doesn't change password of 'installer' user Removed tag(s) d-i. Bug #926947 [d-i.debian.org] d-i.debian.org: Sett

Bug#926947: d-i.debian.org: Setting the 'd-i network-console/password password' preseed variable doesn't change password of 'installer' user

Control: tag -1 - d-i + patch pending Control: reassign -1 network-console Hi Vladislav, Vladislav Tomenko (2019-04-12): > Package: d-i.debian.org > Severity: important > Tags: d-i FWIW: Our usual catch-alls for reporting bugs are debian-installer and installation-reports; d-i.d

Processed: Re: Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #928299 [installation-reports] installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible Added tag(s) patch and pending. > reassign -1 network-console Bug #928299 [installation-reports] installation-reports: n

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Control: tag -1 patch pending Control: reassign -1 network-console Hi, Frank Gard (2019-05-02): > Am 02.05.19 um 09:43 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > > Hi again, > > > > […] > > OK, thanks. That confirms at least the echo instruction I quoted is > > executed

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Hi Am 02.05.19 um 09:43 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > Hi again, > > […] > OK, thanks. That confirms at least the echo instruction I quoted is > executed, but gen-crypt didn't do its job… > […] > … which is understandable given the segfault. > […] > > Please mention at the very least your

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Hi again, Frank Gard (2019-05-02): > On Thu, 2 May 2019 08:55:54 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > OK. What does /etc/shadow look like? > > Its content is: > > installer::1:0:9:7::: OK, thanks. That confirms at least the echo instruction I quoted is executed, but gen-crypt didn't do its

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Frank Gard (2019-05-02): > Hi all, If you only mail n...@bugs.debian.org, only the maintainers will see you reply, please use reply-all. > I'm terribly sorry, but no. All I can say is that there are no > problems at all when using stable ("stretch"). OK, thanks anyway. > But it was the very

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Dear Cyril, On Thu, 2 May 2019 08:55:54 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > […] > > OK. What does /etc/shadow look like? Its content is: installer::1:0:9:7::: > […] > echo "installer:$(gen-crypt $PASSWORD):1:0:9:7:::" >> /etc/shadow > > with gen-crypt reading some tiny amount of data from

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Hi all, On Thu, 2 May 2019 08:07:46 +0200 Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 08:00:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > […] > > Any chance you'd know when it last worked for you on sid or buster? I'm terribly sorry, but no. All I can say is that there are no problems at all when

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

(Adding Frank; please use reply-all on the Debian BTS.) Marc Haber (2019-05-02): > On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 08:00:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Marc Haber (2019-05-01): > > > at least today's daily installer snapshot has a totally broken > > > network-cons

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 08:00:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Marc Haber (2019-05-01): > > at least today's daily installer snapshot has a totally broken > > network-console. It asks for a password and confirmation and then > > prompts to continue isntallati

Processed: Re: Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - d-i Bug #928299 [installation-reports] installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible Removed tag(s) d-i. -- 928299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928299 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Control: tag -1 - d-i Hi, Marc Haber (2019-05-01): > at least today's daily installer snapshot has a totally broken > network-console. It asks for a password and confirmation and then > prompts to continue isntallation with ssh installer@. > > However, no password hash is

Bug#928299: installation-reports: network-console doesnt set password hash, ssh not possible

Package: installation-reports Severity: important Tags: d-i Dear Maintainer, at least today's daily installer snapshot has a totally broken network-console. It asks for a password and confirmation and then prompts to continue isntallation with ssh installer@. However, no password hash

Bug#927516: Updating the network-console Uploaders list

Source: network-console Version: 1.79 1.80 Severity: minor User: m...@qa.debian.org Usertags: mia-teammaint Christian Perrier has retired, so can't work on the network-console package anymore (at least with this address). We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you

Bug#926947: d-i.debian.org: Setting the 'd-i network-console/password password' preseed variable doesn't change password of 'installer' user

Package: d-i.debian.org Severity: important Tags: d-i I'm trying to install Debian 10 with preseed configuration. A password of an 'installer' user was set like this: d-i anna/choose_modules string network-console d-i network-console/password password password d-i network-console/password-again

Accepted network-console 1.77 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:55:09 +0200 Source: network-console Binary: network-console Architecture: source Version: 1.77 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org> C

Accepted network-console 1.76 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:36:04 +0100 Source: network-console Binary: network-console Architecture: source Version: 1.76 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org> C

Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

On 1/21/2018 5:19 PM, Jack Bates wrote: Thank you both for your help, I'll keep working on it and post here when I have more information or questions. My guess would be that the D-I would need to be modified to owner the value of DEBIAN_FRONTEND. Support for ssh keys has been added and

Re: Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

Thank you both for your help, I'll keep working on it and post here when I have more information or questions.

Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 09:15:23AM +0100, john doe wrote: > On 1/19/2018 11:35 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > >Thanks for your help, but when I boot with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text, > >it affects only the *local* console ... In other words, when I > >boot with "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=te

Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

On 1/19/2018 11:35 PM, Jack Bates wrote: Thanks for your help, but when I boot with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text, it affects only the *local* console ... In other words, when I boot with "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text modules=network-console", the local console does display the text frontend, but

Re: Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

Thanks for your help, but when I boot with DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text, it affects only the *local* console ... In other words, when I boot with "DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text modules=network-console", the local console does display the text frontend, but when I ssh in, I still get the default fron

Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:44:49AM -0700, Jack Bates wrote: > How do you set the network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND? > > When I boot the installer with modules=network-console and ssh in, I > get the default frontend (newt). How do I switch to > DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text? > http

Re: network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

On 1/19/2018 5:44 PM, Jack Bates wrote: How do you set the network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND? When I boot the installer with modules=network-console and ssh in, I get the default frontend (newt). How do I switch to DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text? From: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386

network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND?

How do you set the network-console DEBIAN_FRONTEND? When I boot the installer with modules=network-console and ssh in, I get the default frontend (newt). How do I switch to DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text?

preseed_fetch for network-console/authorized_keys_url?

What do you think about replacing wget with preseed_fetch, for downloading the authorized_keys_url in network-console? diff --git a/debian/network-console.postinst b/debian/network-console.postinst index 02496a9..203d60d 100755 --- a/debian/network-console.postinst +++ b/debian/network

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

Roger Shimizu, on Wed 30 Nov 2016 23:53:31 +0900, wrote: > Just one issue for SSH (network-console). > Since the SSH session shares the same screen with serial, the screen > size is limited to 80x25 (probably, I didn't count the number), which > is too small to most recent monitor de

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Roger Shimizu <rogershim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll test the daily image on my Linkstation NAS. I tested the daily image on my armel devices. Both serial way and SSH way works fine. And if connect both serial and SSH (network-console), serial/SSH se

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

riable > which afaict wasn't set set anywhere. Originally I add screen support to D-I for my orion5x-based Linkstation NAS, which supports both serial / network console to start D-I. I want to support screen in both way (serial / network console), because - for serial console, no other optio

Bug#844549: marked as done (network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2016 16:35:04 + with message-id <e1c8v56-0001kt...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#844549: fixed in rootskel 1.121 has caused the Debian Bug report #844549, regarding network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh to be marked a

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

; I'm not sure what the intent was. I assume you're right because Roger > > didn't exclude screen from the network-console images. Personally, > > I'm not sure I see the point of screen in that case because you can > > always open a second SSH connection and open a termi

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> writes: > * Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> [2016-11-16 23:03]: >> But AIUI the intent was to have screen in ssh connections too. > > I'm not sure what the intent was. I assume you're right because Roger > didn't exclude s

Bug#843348: Network-console ssh session closes immediately

Hi Richard, Richard Huynh <voxlym...@gmail.com> (2016-11-06): > Package: installation-reports > > Boot method: network-console > Image version: > https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/20161105-01:20/kirkwood/network-console/buffalo/ls-qvl/ > Date: 2016/11/

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

gt; didn't exclude screen from the network-console images. Personally, > I'm not sure I see the point of screen in that case because you can > always open a second SSH connection and open a terminal, but I don't > have strong feelings either way if there's an advantage of having > screen in su

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

* Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> [2016-11-16 23:03]: > But AIUI the intent was to have screen in ssh connections too. I'm not sure what the intent was. I assume you're right because Roger didn't exclude screen from the network-console images. Personally, I'm not sure I see

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

re d-i is first started with the serial console, running through screen, and enable the network console, which we'd also want to run through screen. I'd thus say that we rather want the attached changes, to have one screen session per terminal type. I'm also thinking that we perhaps want to add -

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

* Ben Hutchings [2016-11-16 21:15]: > >   rm -f $font > > - if [ -x "$screen_bin" -a \( "$TERM_TYPE" = network -o "$TERM_TYPE" = > > serial \) -a "$TERM" != dumb ]; then > > + if [ -x "$screen_bin" -a \( "$TERM_TYPE" != network -o "$TERM_TYPE" = > > serial \) -a

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 12:07 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: rootskel > Version: 1.119 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > > Several users have reported to me that the network-console images are > broken. > > Commit ec6d3c3d79 (Move screen support) moved

Bug#844549: network-console broken: no screen to be resumed matching sh

Package: rootskel Version: 1.119 Severity: serious Tags: patch Several users have reported to me that the network-console images are broken. Commit ec6d3c3d79 (Move screen support) moved the screen support around and also changed the logic of when screen is used. Unfortunately, that change broke

Bug#843348: Network-console ssh session closes immediately

Package: installation-reports Boot method: network-console Image version: https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/20161105-01:20/kirkwood/network-console/buffalo/ls-qvl/ Date: 2016/11/05 Machine: Buffalo Linkstation LS-QVL Processor: Memory: Partitions: Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn

How to build debian-installer under amd64 (was: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console)

Dear boot list, I was building network-console d-i image under armel without problem, however now I meet problem under amd64. Here's my command to trigger the build on amd64: $ make reallyclean $ fakeroot make build_netboot Then after a while there's some warning/error: Selecting previously

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2016-04-02 21:47 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > If you added the "--add-udeb" option in ncurses' debian/rules, all it > takes is to actually install your locally built libncursesw5-dev along > all its dependencies (most

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On 2016-04-02 21:47 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: >> On 2016-03-30 09:39 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: >>> There may need some time before those patches would be merged, and >>> package get released. >>> My question is, can I

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

Dear Sven, Thanks for your guidance these days! On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2016-03-30 09:39 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> There may need some time before those patches would be merged, and >> package get released. >> My question is, can I use

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On 2016-03-30 09:39 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> Yes, UI/cursor-hightlight is bit strange. But it at least works. >> I'll try to make libraries, introduced by screen, udeb support first, >> and then fix the UI

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Yes, UI/cursor-hightlight is bit strange. But it at least works. > I'll try to make libraries, introduced by screen, udeb support first, > and then fix the UI issue. Some progress updates for this RFC. I have made a

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

iables. >> Here's the result. Yes, they're different, but I don't see any clue >> would cause the crash. > > What I was suggesting was that you try running something like: > > unset TERMCAP > TERM='linux' > export TERM > /sbin/debian-installer /bin/network-consol

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

any clue > would cause the crash. What I was suggesting was that you try running something like: unset TERMCAP TERM='linux' export TERM /sbin/debian-installer /bin/network-console-menu to see if that allows it to run without crashing. It might well look wrong, with broken line-

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

'/var/mail/installer' OPTIND='1' PATH='/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin' PPID='1259' PS1='\w \$ ' PS2='> ' PS4='+ ' PWD='/' SHELL='/bin/network-console' SSH_CLIENT=' 35805 22' SSH_CONNECTION=' 35805 22' SSH_TTY='/dev/pts/0' TERM='linux' TERM_TYPE='network' USER='ins

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:12 AM, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-02-19 17:00, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> I have a new idea on d-i/network-console: multi-console support >> (screen/tmux). > > To be honest: This would be incredibly exciting for serial console

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

t; Thanks for your guidance! > > I put screen-udeb to build/localudebs, with a few screen's dependency > library, which is currently .deb pull from regular apt repo. > Yes, network-console target build well (qnap failed due to size > problem), and boot well on my linkstation. >

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

w screen's dependency library, which is currently .deb pull from regular apt repo. Yes, network-console target build well (qnap failed due to size problem), and boot well on my linkstation. After that, I tried to find how to hook "screen" into d-i/ssh session. Now I know, the project is

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

* Roger Shimizu [2016-03-01 00:52]: > > You can put local udebs in build/localudebs > > $ ls -l build/localudebs/ > total 4 > -rw-r--r-- 1 roger roger 0 Feb 15 00:52 Packages > -rw-r--r-- 1 roger roger 20 Feb 15 00:52 Packages.gz Just copy the .udeb into the directory.

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Roger Shimizu [2016-02-25 01:01]: >> If I have done the udeb of screen/tmux, how to build into d-i? >> Currently I use "make reallyclean; make >> build_kirkwood_network-console" to build d-i

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

Dear Philipp, On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: > On 2016-02-19 17:00, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> >> I have a new idea on d-i/network-console: multi-console support >> (screen/tmux). > > > To be honest: This would be in

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

On 2016-02-19 17:00, Roger Shimizu wrote: I have a new idea on d-i/network-console: multi-console support (screen/tmux). To be honest: This would be incredibly exciting for serial console as well. Kind regards Philipp Kern

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

* Roger Shimizu [2016-02-25 01:01]: > If I have done the udeb of screen/tmux, how to build into d-i? > Currently I use "make reallyclean; make > build_kirkwood_network-console" to build d-i image. > But it seems using the udeb from apt repo, not local compiling. You can

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

gt;> I think it's also benefit for embedded world if we can see the log >> output while installing. > > Sure, but with network-console you can easily achieve this by SSH to > d-i, open a shell, and typing "tail -f /var/log/syslog". Good to know this. But I think having scree

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

installing. Sure, but with network-console you can easily achieve this by SSH to d-i, open a shell, and typing "tail -f /var/log/syslog". > And I have no idea what's netboot for. Maybe it's like the old > business card CD image? netboot = install via network, do installation via serial cons

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

silly idea. So here's the RFC to hear other voice. > > I often would like to have a second console. I think it's actually > more a problem for netboot rather than network-console because you can > simply open a second SSH connection with the latter. Actually, having multiply console

Re: [RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

for netboot rather than network-console because you can simply open a second SSH connection with the latter. On the other hand, it's not clear how d-i can be started within screen/tmux, but maybe you know. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

[RFC] screen/tmux support for network-console

Dear Martin and D-I Maintainer, I have a new idea on d-i/network-console: multi-console support (screen/tmux). For d-i on normal PC, we can simply press alt-F2 to get a console almost anytime during install, but it's not easy for current network-console if there's no serial console. So I'm

Bug#814342: marked as done (lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode)

Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:30:18 + with message-id <e1aud5o-00029l...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#814342: fixed in oldsys-preseed 3.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #814342, regarding lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode to be marked a

Processed: Re: Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 oldsys-preseed Bug #814342 [lowmem] lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode Bug reassigned from package 'lowmem' to 'oldsys-preseed'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #814342 to the same values previously set Ignor

Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

[2016-02-11 16:28]: >>> Now it's clear, since in d-i, file >>> build/pkg-lists/netboot/network-console/armel/orion5x.cfg >>> >>> oldsys-preseed >>> # sata and ext2/ext3 modules are needed by oldsys-preseed to read the disk >>> # -> disable du

Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > * Roger Shimizu <rogershim...@gmail.com> [2016-02-11 16:28]: >> Now it's clear, since in d-i, file >> build/pkg-lists/netboot/network-console/armel/orion5x.cfg >> >> oldsys-

Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

* Roger Shimizu <rogershim...@gmail.com> [2016-02-11 16:28]: > Now it's clear, since in d-i, file > build/pkg-lists/netboot/network-console/armel/orion5x.cfg > > oldsys-preseed > # sata and ext2/ext3 modules are needed by oldsys-preseed to read the disk > # -> d

Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

Package: lowmem Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, There's a mode calling network-console in d-i, which let user to use SSH to connect to the target device for Debian installation. But if lowmem detects memory is low, it will block d-i and prevent SSH daemon

Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

* Roger Shimizu <rogershim...@gmail.com> [2016-02-11 01:19]: > Package: lowmem > > There's a mode calling network-console in d-i, which let user to use > SSH to connect to the target device for Debian installation. > But if lowmem detects memory is low, it will block d-i and

Bug#814342: lowmem should not block when in network-console d-i mode

Dear Martin, On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > * Roger Shimizu <rogershim...@gmail.com> [2016-02-11 01:19]: >> Package: lowmem >> >> There's a mode calling network-console in d-i, which let user to use >> SSH to

Re: network-console on armhf

On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 14:41 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I'm in the process of adding support for some NAS devices that use > armhf.  They will use network-console for the installation. > > I have 2 questions I wanted to discuss: > > 1) Preseeding the network: on armel, we

Bug#809301: marked as done (Should usb-serial-modules be excluded from network-console/armel.cfg?)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:47:07 + with message-id <e1al8h5-00011y...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#809301: fixed in debian-installer 20150422+deb8u3 has caused the Debian Bug report #809301, regarding Should usb-serial-modules be excluded from network-console/arm

Re: network-console on armhf

t;bootz" command). Good point. The device I'm interested in doesn't have bootz but it can load a DTB via bootm. Maybe I'll just ask users to create their own uImage/uInitrd for now. If that causes problems for users, I could always create network-console/seagate/ later with an uImage and uInitrd. Any input on 1)? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/

Re: network-console on armhf

* Rick Thomas <rbtho...@pobox.com> [2016-01-03 18:06]: > > And is anyone using network-console on armhf yet? (Just wondering > > if I can make changes without breaking things) > > I have two Cubox-i4pro (armhf) machines that I installed jessie on > recently using net

network-console on armhf

I'm in the process of adding support for some NAS devices that use armhf. They will use network-console for the installation. I have 2 questions I wanted to discuss: 1) Preseeding the network: on armel, we use oldsys-preseed to read the existing network configuration file from the firmware

Re: network-console on armhf

Hi martin, On Jan 3, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > And is anyone using network-console on > armhf yet? (Just wondering if I can make changes without breaking > things) I have two Cubox-i4pro (armhf) machines that I installed jessie on recently

Re: network-console on armhf

On Jan 3, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> wrote: > * Rick Thomas <rbtho...@pobox.com> [2016-01-03 18:06]: >>> And is anyone using network-console on armhf yet? (Just wondering >>> if I can make changes without breaking things) >> >

[PATCH 2/5] Exclude usb-modules explicitly on armel/orion5x network-console

util/pkg-list pulls in usb-modules due to usb-serial-modules, even though usb-serial-modules is excluded on the network-console image. Work around this bug by exlucding usb-modules explicitly. (cherry picked from commit f947389e098f752e3e71032d6dd7871a3272c1d7) --- build/pkg-lists/netboot

[PATCH 1/5] Exclude usb-serial-modules from the armel network-console image

network-console instalations are done via SSH, so it doesn't make sense to include usb-serial-modules for Braille readers Closes: #809301 (cherry picked from commit 065730b97d81b05f0751f24b4bce03354c56f83e) --- build/pkg-lists/netboot/network-console/armel.cfg | 2 +- debian/changelog

Bug#809301: marked as done (Should usb-serial-modules be excluded from network-console/armel.cfg?)

Your message dated Fri, 01 Jan 2016 18:04:24 + with message-id <e1af43s-0007oz...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#809301: fixed in debian-installer 20160101 has caused the Debian Bug report #809301, regarding Should usb-serial-modules be excluded from network-console/arm

Bug#809301: Should usb-serial-modules be excluded from network-console/armel.cfg?

Martin Michlmayr, on Tue 29 Dec 2015 09:31:51 -0800, wrote: > Just to understand for the future, is usb-serial-modules enough for > Braille readers or are other udebs required in addition to > usb-serial-modules? brltty-udeb is needed too. Samuel

  1   2   3   4   >