Martin Schulze wrote:
Martin Schulze wrote:
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.15
When installing from harddisk, rescue.bin is looked for in the
images-1.44 directory. If it is not found in this directory
the installation does not proceed.
Normally all the installation
Joey Hess wrote:
They will be written in C, or perhaps, in POSIX shell script (without
any external commands except ar, tar, gunzip, though..).
If C, would it be ok if it was specific to busybox or would it have to
be independent?
If its writen specifically for busybox it could access
The Hardware:
Motherboard: BE6 (abit)
Prossesor: 566 celeron II
Ram: 196
IDE:intel ide controller
HPT366 on board with be6
Configuration of IDE:intel ide1 = cd-rom master
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 02:27:15PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
The bug has some connection to the boot-floppies since it happens
through the boot-floppies/base-system. Something is different
with whiptaill when using the root.bin and using
I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not
detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect.
I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so
that anXious could know about more videocards which get updated at
Potato point releases. Do you
Tommy Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I'm not sure the patch should be applied to the kernel just
yet for a couple of reasons. One of them is that the screen reader
is alpha software, but is quite usalbe in it's current form, the
other reason is that if the synthesiser isn't connected
On Sun Aug 20, 2000 at 09:25:14PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
I think that just like dpkg, it should be split into two programs:
microdpkg-deb to handles the low-level unpacking of packages, and
microdpkg, to do dependency checking, and so on. Maybe this will turn
out not to make sense; some
The version on the floppy I am using says `Rescue 2.2 0714'
If I try something like
boot: resue root=/dev/hda2 debug
I get an error message
SCSI:fdomian Detection failed (no card)
I guess that the reason is that there is an incompatibility
between this version of the rescue disk and the
On Aug 21, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not
detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect.
I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so
that anXious could know about more videocards which get updated
Previously Sean Perry wrote:
This is all moot if we move to X 4. X does it own monitor / vid card
detection now.
I wonder if it doesn't make more sense to use a mixed X3/X4 setup for
woody and base the decision on which server to use on the installed
videocard?
Wichert.
--
On 21-Aug-2000 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Sean Perry wrote:
This is all moot if we move to X 4. X does it own monitor / vid card
detection now.
I wonder if it doesn't make more sense to use a mixed X3/X4 setup for
woody and base the decision on which server to use on the
Yann Lamontagne wrote:
The Hardware:
Motherboard: BE6 (abit)
Prossesor: 566 celeron II
Ram: 196
IDE:intel ide controller
HPT366 on board with be6
Configuration of IDE:intel ide1 =
On 21-Aug-2000 Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not
detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect.
I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so
that anXious could know about more videocards which get
I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not
detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect.
I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so
that anXious could know about more videocards which get updated at
Potato point releases. Do
On Mon Aug 21, 2000 at 06:32:09PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something though (I almost certainly am), but do we really
need a 'microdpkg-deb'? Wouldn't just 'microdpkg' be enough? When we go to
install the base system, we really just want to unpack the .debs and drop
Erik Andersen wrote:
Doing depends will cetainly be too nasty for a shell scriot, so if we really
want to include depends, then I agree that doing udpkg in C is the way
to go.
Yes, we really do need depends. As Randolph says, partly to make sure it
doesn't screw up a system too badly[1], and
Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A;
Severity: normal
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch-welcome.en.html#s1.7
"WARNING: This Document is in Testing". This paragraph says that it is
an "early, prerelease version". Now that potato has been released,
should this perhaps be rephrased?
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 09:34:05AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
I know there are still plenty of video cards that xviddetect does not
detect. I can see a lot of bug reports to that effect.
I think it would be worthwhile to maintain a branch of xviddetect so
that anXious could know about
18 matches
Mail list logo
