I get the following while using the current netinst images from the
glick daily build :
(VMWare virtual machine)
On 4th console :
(none) user.info anna[1742] : sh : relocation error : sh : symbol __
register_frame_info, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6
with line time reference
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 02:09:11PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
oldpmac: uses bootx, miboot, quik or serial console OF. OF uses the
.coff kernel, don't know about initrd. miboot uses floopy for kernel
(compressed) and initrd. bootx
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
subarches
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:13:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install, quik for running systems
and miboot for
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get the following while using the current netinst images from the
glick daily build :
(VMWare virtual machine)
On 4th console :
(none) user.info anna[1742] : sh : relocation error : sh : symbol __
register_frame_info, version GLIBC_2.0 not
Brad Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:13:01AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install,
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second round of
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:31:15PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls it from the
CD. Should be no different then the normal Amiga m68k.
Same freeness problems too that allways got ignored
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls it from the
CD. Should be no different then the normal
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:41:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
For apus there should be an Icon that directly calls it from the
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:27:02PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Polish;pl_PL;pl;PL;
Updated. new revision: 1.22; previous revision: 1.21
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 09:13, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install, quik for running systems
and miboot for those not
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:29:58 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posted to the debian-boot mailing list:
I know that the Hebrew and Icelandic texts are completely
untranslated, and would also like to have the other texts checked as
well.
But Icelandic is even misspelled ... Sorry I
Hydrocodone at a Discount
Vicodin ES 90 Tab Special. Buy Now!
Free Doctors consultation
http://www.medsdepot.biz/pharmplace
take off list
http://www.medsdepot.biz/a.html
hharbefj jbtkfixcp
lchrv n
oofesej er rxqmi qmwyypa
jub f jrymr
azpbuce
jyatl
Package:install-doc
Version:Current version accessed from debian.org
Section 9.6.1 Kernel Image Management, Paragraph 6 contains an error.
Mid-way through 3rd sentance, text reads:
... extract the kernel sources (tar xIf /usr/src/kernel-source- ...
Should read:
extract the kernel
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I'm trying to make linux-kernel-di usable for arch!=i386.
I first tried to understand the dependency checking code in
copy-modules, but it probably needs a degree in rocket-science to
understand that completely. But as far as I understood it, dependencies
are only
Package: ftp.debian.org
Tags: d-i
Christian Perrier wrote:
I get the following while using the current netinst images from the
glick daily build :
(VMWare virtual machine)
On 4th console :
(none) user.info anna[1742] : sh : relocation error : sh : symbol __
register_frame_info, version
Package: autopartkit
Version: unknown; from 10/9 netinst CD
My machine has a IDE ZIP drive on it, which is accessed using the SCSI
drivers. autopartkit kept trying to do things with it, but was unable
to since I had no ZIP disk in the drive. Got lots of warning messages
complaining about it,
Since I didn't hear anything from progeny I have made discover2 packages
for testing. You can download them at
http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/d-i/discover2/
As we don't get any responses from progeny I ask myself if it's really a
good thing to base our hw-detection on discover or if we should
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I commited the changes needed for the /linuxrc /sbin/init move. I
changed rootskel, build/Makefile and various bootloader config in
build/boot/.
Those changes go hand in hand so a new rootskel needs to be released
and enter sid before the build script will
We offer canned peach in syrup x 850 grs. box x 24 Cans u$s 15 FOB Buenos Aires.
Bairestrade Brokers
Viamonte 1546 7o 703
www.bairestrade.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bajo decreto S1618 titulo 3ro. aprobado por el 105 Congreso de
Estandarización de Normativas
Bajo el Decreto S.1618 TITULO III
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.45_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.45_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.45_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.45_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.45.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.45.dsc
rootskel_0.45.tar.gz
to
I think I misunderstood your intent -- thought you were going to merge
your whole build/mrvn tree back to build in 12 hours. I see now that you
only mean to change build/debian, which I have no problem with since
build/debian is not in a releasable state on the mainline at all right
now. You can
hello
in configure.in, there is problem in using option --with-db and --with-frontend
if no arguments are passed = try to use the 'yes.so' module
dnl What db modules to build?
AC_ARG_WITH(db,[ --with-db db modules to build])
DB_MODULES=$with_db
dnl What frontend modules to build?
Sven,
I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with di;
however, I need zImage (or zImage.inetd) for network install, and the
vmlinux image.
It is not clear to me what these .deb and .udeb files are. A readme file
would help.
Rolf
--
Rolf Brudeseth
pSeries Global
Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 09:13, Sven Luther wrote:
Ok thanks for this response, this clearly clarifies the situation for
oldpmac, altough i don't really think this will modify our strategy for
oldpmac : miboot or bootx for initial install, quik for
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
Sven,
I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with di;
however, I need zImage (or zImage.inetd) for network install, and the
vmlinux image.
It is not clear to me what these .deb and .udeb
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I commited the changes needed for the /linuxrc /sbin/init move. I
changed rootskel, build/Makefile and various bootloader config in
build/boot/.
Those changes go hand in hand so a new rootskel needs to be released
and
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
subarches boot. The situation as i understand it is :
[snip]
prep: no idea.
Package: busybox-cvs
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-10-20
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
/linuxrc only works in some special cases that can't be used inn all
cases on all architectures and is obsolete since pivot_root was
invented. Because of that the rootskel
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
Sven,
I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with
di;
however, I need zImage (or zImage.inetd) for network install, and the
vmlinux image.
It is not clear to me what these .deb
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second round of investigation concerning the way different
subarches
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:15:09PM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
Sven,
I would like to test the chrp-rs6k image and use it in conjunction with
di;
however, I need zImage (or zImage.inetd) for
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on making debian-installer subarch friendly, i
now launch a second
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:52:06AM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
Why is the zImage called vmlinuz (see above). Surely this must confuse more
people than just me. Above you say you provide it and below you do not.
Tradition.
Originally the UNIX kernel
Ok. So you only need the vmlinuz-2.4.22-powerpc. I will unpack it for
you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Thanks. I booted the kernel you made available on an IBM 43P-150 via BOOTP.
It got all the way up to looking for the initrd image.
Do you want me to test the vmlinuz-2.4.22-power3 32-bit
Howdy,
The automatic daily debian-installer image build appears to be broken; the most
recent images are from 2003-10-18. Would you please investigate?
--
Matt
-
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
Ok. So you only need the vmlinuz-2.4.22-powerpc. I will unpack it for
you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Thanks. I booted the kernel you made available on an IBM 43P-150 via
BOOTP.
It got all the way up to looking for the initrd image.
Do you want me to test the
Package: main-menu
Version: 0.044
Severity: serious
main-menu defaults to netcfg-static even though netcfg-dhcp is installed, so it
configures netcfg-static automatically. This breaks networking and the install
fails.
--
Matt
-
This message was
Hi,
if you would be so kind as to remove /sbin/init too so we don't have
to use --force-overwrite and hope the udebs are in the right order I
would be eternally gratefull.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Am Mon, den 20.10.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 02:00:
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I'm trying to make linux-kernel-di usable for arch!=i386.
I first tried to understand the dependency checking code in
copy-modules, but it probably needs a degree in rocket-science to
understand that
I said (to myself):
main-menu defaults to netcfg-static even though netcfg-dhcp is installed, so it
configures netcfg-static automatically. This breaks networking and the install
fails.
I've since figured out what was wrong: the inner loop in get_default_menu_item
was using the iteration
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
During my efforts to understand what copy-modules does (I think I
understand it now :-) ), I added some comments to the script. Can I
commit this improved version or are you working on copy-modules at the
moment?
By all means, go ahead.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
I forgot to mention that I spoke with some of the buildd maintainers
today. Apparently a lot of buildds block network entirely even if it is
available. Still I think using a source package and the buildds gives us
so many advantages we should still try to do it, even if it will need
special cases.
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: Buy Xanax® (alprazolam) Online! Buying it online is
easy and legal
Assuming that we do get an autobuildable debian-installer source package
into the archive that can generate install images, we still seem to have
no plan for what form of binaries it would produce, aside from the
requisite .deb or .udeb. Since we have not had much feedback from the
ftp masters on
If we do upload a source package that is intended to trigger daily image
builds on the autobuilders, has anyone considered how we will handle
getting a new version of this source package uploaded each day?
Specifically, it needs to be signed, which needs to be a manual process
for security. It
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:31:51PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
If we do upload a source package that is intended to trigger daily image
builds on the autobuilders, has anyone considered how we will handle
getting a new version of this source package uploaded each day?
Specifically, it needs to
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: DISCREET!leitmotiv OVERNIGHT PHARMACY Our Doctors
will write
Hi,
debian-installer currently needs a lot of ram to install all the udebs
on the cdrom. That was one reason for me to suggest mixing debix and
debian-installer together into a live-cd install.
So here is how it could work:
-
1. A small initrd is booted with enough
This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: DISCREET!dixie OVERNIGHT PHARMACY Our Doctors will
write
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:45:47PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:10:21AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:29:38AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
In order to continue work on
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:41:14PM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
Ok. So you only need the vmlinuz-2.4.22-powerpc. I will unpack it for
you.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Thanks. I booted the kernel you made available on an IBM 43P-150 via BOOTP.
It got all the way up to looking
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 04:31:08PM -0500, Rolf Brudeseth wrote:
Sven,
I found this initrd image (9/20/2003) that I am using for now:
http://www.soziologie.ch/users/steinlin/d-i/netboot-initrd.gz
However, I am having problems NFS mounting the image, something that I have
done successfully
55 matches
Mail list logo
