Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This will be the last Beta release. The next release will be a release
candidate (RC) for Etch. For RC releases we _will_ have formal string
freeze periods for translation updates and it is also more important that
you have your translations updated
Hi,
On Monday 19 June 2006 22:56, Sven Luther wrote:
In the end I gave up and stopped working on that approach. A few month
later I started again to work on the installer, but this time I tried to
create a separate native ppc64 d-i port. This turned out to be pretty
easy and the resulting
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:40:05PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
The inconvenience could be ameliorated if the force-fsck mount counter
could be staggered for each partition. For instance, the first
partition on every 20 mounts, the second on every 21, and so on. Then
on a given reboot, on
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 04:40, Anthony Juckel wrote:
FYI, the 2006-06-20 amd64 netinst image is still using a 2.6.15
kernel, so I still get the same module load error. I've got a vested
interest in testing the nightlies until I get a version that works for
me, so I'll keep relating my
Do anot ignore me bplease,b
I found your email somewhere and nobwb decided to write you.
I am coming to your place in few weeks abnd bthought wae
can meaet each other. Let me know ifa you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Holger Levsen wrote:
which solution do you think is better? the cross-installer (isnt there
one for amd64 already?) or the native installer?
There is currently no cross-installer for amd64 as far as I know.
There is not even a 64-bit kernel flavor in the i386 repository.
There was one
I have been fighting the whole Sunday to make a patch to the debian
package gtk+2.0 so that it produces also a library with the directfb
backend.
why?
The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the gtk+-directfb
packages.
Until now I have maneged to make a separate set of targets
On 6/20/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been fighting the whole Sunday to make a patch to the debian
package gtk+2.0 so that it produces also a library with the directfb
backend.
why?
The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the gtk+-directfb
packages.
I wanted
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:45:00AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hello,
Holger Levsen wrote:
which solution do you think is better? the cross-installer (isnt there
one for amd64 already?) or the native installer?
There is currently no cross-installer for amd64 as far as I know.
Hello,
I'd like to translate boot of instalation to Samogitian language.
Arns Udovīčė
I'm playing with preseeding d-i and i'm wondering how to preseed dictionaries
selection.
I tried with
dictionaries-common dictionaries-common/default-ispell select italiano
(Italian)
dictionaries-common dictionaries-common/default-wordlistselect italiano
(Italian)
but i've got no
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:52:59PM +0300, Zordsdavini iz Litvy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to translate boot of instalation to Samogitian language.
As far as I known is it documented
at http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/d-i/i18n-doc/
Feel free to ask here, this mailinglist, further questions.
Iacopo Spalletti wrote:
I'm playing with preseeding d-i and i'm wondering how to preseed dictionaries
selection.
I tried with
dictionaries-common dictionaries-common/default-ispell select italiano
(Italian)
dictionaries-common dictionaries-common/default-wordlistselect italiano
What to do if for now there is no SO-639 code of the Samogitian
language. We use bat-smg in wikipedia. May be here we have use the
same.
Arns Udovīčė
2006/6/20, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:52:59PM +0300, Zordsdavini iz Litvy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:45:00AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hello,
Holger Levsen wrote:
which solution do you think is better? the cross-installer (isnt there
one for amd64 already?) or the native installer?
There is currently no
why?
The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the
gtk+-directfb packages.
I wanted to do so... and if I do it right, their work will be less.
I'm not sure they need help on packaging; I might be wrong but
I don't think the gtk is not ready because of technical problems.
On 6/20/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why?
The Gnome team will support the D-I team in producing the
gtk+-directfb packages.
I wanted to do so... and if I do it right, their work will be less.
I'm not sure they need help on packaging; I might be wrong but
I don't think the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 03:31:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
Joey applied this patch yesterday and today I've built cdebconf for the
new version and after that a mini.iso including that.
When pkgsel is run, the debconf database is still being trashed...
/me is confused
Ouch, that's not good.
Just to throw my two cents in. It's my understanding that the official packages
upped the Directfb build to 0.9.24 which is fine for testing.
If your comfortable using newer versions to see if problems have been
fixed feel free but it was just a suggestion.
Since the directfb/gdk/cairo software
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:50, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Dave announced the availablity of the cairo packages for quite a while
and I haven't seen any move from the gtk/gnome team. The most
important thing I learen in OSS is that you (yourself) are the best o
scratch your own itch. That's what I
On 6/20/06, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:50, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Dave announced the availablity of the cairo packages for quite a while
and I haven't seen any move from the gtk/gnome team. The most
important thing I learen in OSS is that you (yourself) are
On Monday 19 June 2006 20:57, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
After some discussion on IRC, here's the updated patch.
Joey applied this patch yesterday and today I've built cdebconf for the
new version and after that a mini.iso including that.
When pkgsel is run, the debconf database is still being
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:50:31PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Err, i thought your i386 tests made that. If I am doing the patching
against the source package, then you could test it on i386, too. Is
not like they are hacked udebs like Attilio was doing, so you can't
use it.
following the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:05:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
There is still some discussion about those packages and I reported at
least one important needed change a few days ago.
yes, we want everything done the right way, so [1] needs to be sorted out
AFAIK we have not yet asked the Gnome
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:57:02PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
After some discussion on IRC, here's the updated patch.
One change is needed yet; the current code in debconf-copydb simply turns off
i18n support (since the old code couldn't handle that properly, it seems, or
perhaps it's
(Keeping Steinar in To: in the hope he'll want to try this one as well ;-)
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 16:40, you wrote:
One change is needed yet; the current code in debconf-copydb simply
turns off i18n support (since the old code couldn't handle that
properly, it seems, or perhaps it's even
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:15:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 19 June 2006 22:56, David Härdeman wrote:
currently at least partman-lvm, partman-crypto and partman-md seem to
contain copies of confirm_changes() from partman-base/partman.
They are at least different in that they use some
I can confirm this problem (finish install doesn't finish the
install - just flashes the screen and returns to the main menu) when
installing on a PowerMac G4.
I saw it when installing directly from the June 12 jigdo DVD. I
haven't had a chance to try the June 19th jigdo DVD just yet.
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:13:26 +0200 Marc Haber wrote:
Kudos. That installer job is very well done.
Thank you, always nice to hear :-)
Comments/Problems:
Germany is still not present in the list of countries offered in the
initial dialog. A lot more obscure countries are.
If you select
On Jun 20, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Viti Davide wrote:
Note: I feel much anger in your writing...
Yes, your message did piss me off very much indeed.
Is it just me? It sure seems like there's a lot of this going around.
Chill out folks! We're all in this because we think it's *fun*. If
it
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 20:14, David Härdeman wrote:
2) Additional comments in partman-base
Not relevant
I'd suggest to keep the comments in the new common version though.
Any objections to committing it?
No, looks good. The only thing is upload/release timing.
Probably the best thing
On 6/20/06, Davide Viti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 05:50:31PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
following the wiki or using the build script committed in extremadura you
should be able to build any of the g-i libs and that is what Sven, Attilio
and myself did. Packaging the
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Probably the best thing to do is after committing the changes, first
upload only partman-base and only after that's been built for all
architectures upload the other components (with updated versioned
dependency on partman-base and a needs ... comment in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 373629 patch
Bug#373629: failed to do autopartitioning completely (tries the cd device :( )
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi
I tried to get rid of the cd device to make sure that autopartkit doesn't try
to do partitioning on this read-only device.
I am using the ped_device_destroy() function from libparted, please have a
look and comment, I guess this is a good workaround to exclude the cd device
from the list.
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 21:39, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
And he didn't provided an explicit link to the images nor did he
updated the links on the wiki. I am not acusing him, is just the
information was missing.
I think that is reasonable. Colin has not been involved so far and so
could not be
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 21:45, Otavio Salvador wrote:
If the other components can work with the previous partman-base we
don't need to enforce the version, right?
The _current_ versions can. But the new versions of the other components
cannot work with an old version of partman-base, so we do
Hi
As most of you might know the Debian-Edu people are working a bit on the
autopartitioning. Therefore we have two ways which we can go.
First one would be to choose autopartkit and bring it back into a shape where
we can use it for etch. This includes updating the code so that it fits with
Hi all,
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:14:09PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
Looking at the above mentioned comparison, there are three differences:
1) The templates used
This can be taken care of with a parameter as you mentioned
1.5) The priorities at which some templates are asked (high
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 361872 -1
Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target
Bug 361872 cloned as bug 374710.
tag 361872 pending
Bug#361872: debconf-copydb: Trashes debconf database in /target
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
severity -1
Your message dated Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:12:58 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#374704: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Josselin,
Dave Beckett has worked on producing the libcairo packages (with
and without directfb backend enabled) and an experimental version
is available in [1]. We've tested it and used it for testing a
patch which adds the directfb backend to gtk+ 2.8.17/18 (you can get
the patch from [2]).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 374710 - patch
Bug#374710: debconf-copydb: removes Owners: lines from templates.dat in target
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
target
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Steffen Joeris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
22:13 pere adding resize_inode to ext3 file systems seem to require a
rewrite of partman-ext3, as it now uses libparted to create ext2, and then
tune2fs -j to convert it to ext3. there is no safe way to add the
resize_inode option after the file
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to wraite you.
I am coming to byour place in few weeks and thought we
acan meet each other. Let me bknow if you do not mind.
aI am ab naice prebtty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:18:37PM +0200, Max Vozeler wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:14:09PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
Looking at the above mentioned comparison, there are three differences:
1) The templates used
This can be taken care of with a parameter as you mentioned
1.5)
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 08:19:10PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:13:26 +0200 Marc Haber wrote:
Before starting the partitioner, system halts for like two minutes on a
blank blue screen with the floppy light on
That must be during driver loading. Strange that it takes so
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 23:34, David Härdeman wrote:
Oh yes, good catch. I'm fairly certain that all templates should be
asked at the same level, but I'm not sure which level is best. I'll
go with what's currently in partman-base/partman unless someone
objects.
confirm_nochanges should
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 23:32, Marc Haber wrote:
No, the notebook does not have a floppy drive. It has a floppy LED
though.
Huh? Then how the hell does the kernel manage to make the floppy light
light up? I suspect that your hardware does support a floppy device to
some extend and that that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
notfound 163501 1:0.60.4-1.1
Bug#163501: busybox: cp -a doesn't copy symlinks
Bug marked as not found in version 1:0.60.4-1.1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 22:32, Steffen Joeris wrote:
22:00 pere white: if partman-auto can be fixed to do the things we
need, I do not have any reason to keep autopartkit. But that include
LVM support, creating ext3 fs with resize_inode option and scaling the
partition sizes with the disk
It's a beautiful day today
Dear Family,
Just wanted to write you, and let you know, how the degree program I tried out
went.
Well, six weeks later, I graduated, finished received my Ma_sters Degr_ee
with no study required and 100 percent verifiable.
Yeah mom, I know you and Dad doubted it at
How are you,
If you are like most people, you are more than qual.ified with your
experience, but you are lacking that prest.igious piece of paper known as a
D.IPLOMA that is often the passport to success..
Call us today.
1.2.0.6-984-4433
24 hours a day, 7 days a week including Sundays and
53 matches
Mail list logo
