On Tue, September 5, 2006 22:52, Christian Perrier said:
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
partitioning themselves. I think this default should be changed back to
autopartitioning the first disk.
Seconded, of course.
How did that happen? I would guess this was by accident because such
Hello,
When I boot or server (ia64) I receive theses errors :
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd
udevd[]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) -
Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server ldaps://foo.bar:
Can't contact LDAP server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|udevd-event[1478]: rename_net_if: error changing net interface name eth1_temp
to eth0: timeout
Please do not open bugs against udev unless you have verified that you
are using the latest release and first deleted z25_persistent-net.rules.
The version of udev currently
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.53
Severity: normal
Selecting 'Desktop environment' (in Etch Testing) causes tasksel to
hang. (There is a flashing cursor at the bottom left-hand corner of the
console.) If 'Desktop
environment' is selected from within the Etch beta-3
Debian-installer, the
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:39:36AM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Hello,
When I boot or server (ia64) I receive theses errors :
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd
udevd[]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as (null) - Can't
contact LDAP server
udevd[]: nss_ldap:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:23:47AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:39:36AM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
When I boot or server (ia64) I receive theses errors :
Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd
udevd[]: nss_ldap: could not connect to any LDAP server as
Did you file the bug report ? I think filling it correctly to the debian BTS
is the more important thing to do here.
OK the new install is done, report bug filed with logs in it. I hope it
will help.
I'm waiting for the confirmation email.
I still have a problem : no console out of ttyS0.
When
Package: debian-installer
Version: etch beta3
Priority: wishlist
Yodel!
Just a quick idea: if the user tells the partitioner to erase and use the
whole disk in installation, the question from the boot loader whether it
should be put in the MBR could probably be omitted - d-i has control of the
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:58:10AM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
Did you file the bug report ? I think filling it correctly to the debian BTS
is the more important thing to do here.
OK the new install is done, report bug filed with logs in it. I hope it
will help.
Thanks.
I'm waiting for
Package: base-installer
Version: [powerpc] prep kernel flavour selection is broken.
Severity: normal
As said, since 2.6.16 prep has used a -prep kernel (which still uses ARCH=ppc,
and not the new ARCH=powerpc), and this will not change for the etch kernel
(either 2.6.17 and 2.6.18).
So,
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:54:56AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|udevd-event[1478]: rename_net_if: error changing net interface name
eth1_temp to eth0: timeout
Please do not open bugs against udev unless you have verified that you
are using the latest release and
Le mercredi 06 septembre 2006 à 13:17 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:58:10AM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
Did you file the bug report ? I think filling it correctly to the debian
BTS
is the more important thing to do here.
OK the new install is done, report
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:13:22PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
Le mercredi 06 septembre 2006 à 13:17 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:58:10AM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
Did you file the bug report ? I think filling it correctly to the
debian BTS
is the
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:29:12PM +0200, Xavier Grave wrote:
I still have a problem : no console out of ttyS0.
your console is either /dev/hvc0 or /dev/hvsi0 depending on wheter you ran a
virtualized environment or not.
I have tryed :
hvc0:12345:respawn:/sbin/getty -L 9600 hvc0
Your message dated Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:47:03 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#250471: still missing eth1 on Sparc64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.67
Severity: important
Tags: d-i patch
As the subject says, kernel-installer doesn't know about power5+ cpus. The
attached patch does fix this, and joins a cpuinfo for a pseries 710 machine.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers
I still have a problem : no console out of ttyS0.
your console is either /dev/hvc0 or /dev/hvsi0 depending on wheter you ran a
virtualized environment or not.
I have tryed :
hvc0:12345:respawn:/sbin/getty -L 9600 hvc0
I get this following message :
hvc_console tty open failed no vty
My opinion about this request:
* split the bugreport in several BR. One against grub-installer,
the other against the partitioning tools.
* Introduce a debconf flag partitioning/erased_the_only_disk
* Parted, partman and other set the flag if they erased the only in the
computer.
* Important
Package: finish-install
Followup-For: Bug #274649
when installing with serial console on a IBM p510 the line :
T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L hvsi0 9600 vt100
should be added in /etc/inittab
and eventually /etc/securetty can also be modified accordingly.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
386243 is the number of the bug...
for the serial output the line :
T0:23:respawn:/sbin/getty -L hvsi0 9600 vt100
now this is OK, thanks a lot ! I will try it on my openpower710 !
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 05:04:45PM +0200, Jean-Luc CONOTTE wrote:
Hello!
I am looking for a BF2.6... eg a bf2.4 - 2.6
Is this possible to find it?
Or does I have to upgrade after installation??
I don't understand the question.
I match BF with boot-floppies the old Debian Installer.
But
Geert Stappers a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 05:04:45PM +0200, Jean-Luc CONOTTE wrote:
Hello!
I am looking for a BF2.6... eg a bf2.4 - 2.6
Is this possible to find it?
Or does I have to upgrade after installation??
I don't understand the question.
I match BF with boot-floppies the
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:57:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Package: base-installer
Tags: d-i patch
As the subject says, kernel-installer doesn't know about power5+ cpus. The
attached patch does fix this, and joins a cpuinfo for a pseries 710 machine.
Index: powerpc.sh
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:03:45PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 02:57:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Package: base-installer
Tags: d-i patch
As the subject says, kernel-installer doesn't know about power5+ cpus. The
attached patch does fix this, and joins a
Yo Debian-beowulf-request!!
We are small new firm engaged in export of goods to overseas
outside my country .We have won various small exports contract at one
time or the other, recently we were (engaged) contracted to supply
financial programs for market analyzing, management project software
partman-auto_56_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_56.dsc
partman-auto_56.tar.gz
partman-auto_56_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
partman-auto_56.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_56.dsc
partman-auto_56.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_56.tar.gz
partman-auto_56_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_56_i386.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-auto_56.dsc -
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 05:19:23PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:03:45PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Which text should go into the changelog?
Oops, i forgot that one :
[ patch to debian/changelog ]
Both patches are applied.
Sorry.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The Debian GIS subproject is working to package and integrated the
free GIS tools to make them easily available and ready for
professional use. To make the tools easier to find, I believe it
would be useful if there were a GIS workstation task in tasksel. Here
is
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm using the netboot image 20060806 to install a sun blade 2000.
I use
dists/sid/main/installer-sparc/20060806/images/sparc64/netboot/2.6/boot.img
During partitionning, I create a 50MB partition on sda and sdb to make
a RAID 1 /boot and I see
user-setup_1.5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.5.dsc
user-setup_1.5.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.5_all.udeb
user-setup_1.5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: yaboot-installer
Severity: important
Please consider using the ofpathname tool from :
http://powerpc-utils.ozlabs.org/
instead of ofpath for chrp machines, as it works much better and is generally
less buggy than the yaboot ofpath implementation.
An install on an IBM pSeries p505
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 04:35:07PM +0200, sferriol wrote:
Geert Stappers a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 05:04:45PM +0200, Jean-Luc CONOTTE wrote:
[looking for a BF2.6... eg a bf2.4 - 2.6]
I don't understand the question.
A second question is
Where can I find floppy install for
tag 382670 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 15:13:22 -0400
Source: user-setup
Binary: user-setup user-setup-udeb
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.5_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.5_all.udeb
user-setup_1.5.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.5.dsc
user-setup_1.5.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.5.tar.gz
user-setup_1.5_all.deb
to
Your message dated Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:32:33 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in NMU of user-setup 1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.54
Severity: wishlist
xdg-utils is a package which provides third-party applications the
ability to do certain common desktop tasks in a desktop
environment-independent way. For example, opening files and composing
emails in the user's preferred applications.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 382670 + fixed
Bug#382670: debian-installer: Sudo not properly configured
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
38 matches
Mail list logo
