Package: installation-guide
Severity: minor
At
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.alpha/ch02s01.html#alpha-cpus
there is a column in the table named MILO image.
Can this be correct (as MILO currently isn't in Debian anymore)?
There are also some more occurrences of MILO, as for example
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote:
I've uploaded these debs to unstable.
OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before
requesting migration.
Let's hope that with Lenny we can switch to a truly integrated 2.10 soon.
I strongly
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 397973 serious
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
to partitions.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:36:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Final notes:
- I selected Database Server in the tasksel and got postgres-7.4.
Version 8.1 will be in etch.
It's not clear to me which one is intended to be the production version
of postgres. The task currently simply pulls in
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: cd
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20070109-3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 20070112
Machine: Random old pentium 3.
umame -a: Linux weka 2.6.18-3-686 #1 SMP Mon Dec 4 16:41:14 UTC 2006 i686
Hi,
Steve Langasek [2007-01-12 2:41 -0800]:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:36:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Final notes:
- I selected Database Server in the tasksel and got postgres-7.4.
Version 8.1 will be in etch.
It's not clear to me which one is intended to be the production version
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinst CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing
-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 12-january-2007 morning (CET)
Machine: HP ML310 + smartarray 641 + 2*72 GB disk
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 406616 tasksel 2.62
Bug#406616: etch daily installation report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `tasksel'.
clone 406616 -1
Bug#406616: etch daily installation report
Bug 406616 cloned as bug 406630.
retitle 406616
reassign 406616 tasksel 2.62
clone 406616 -1
retitle 406616 print-server: foomatic-gui pulls in too many unrelated packages
severity 406616 wishlist
retitle -1 tasksel: Desktop task _not_ displayed, but still getting partly
installed
severity -1 serious
thanks
On Friday 12 January 2007 12:08, L
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Despite what seems like the entirety of GNOME being installed,
as well as GDM, no x server was installed with it. This is pointless
and a waste of time in the huge majority of cases.
I'm not sure where you get that. The print server tasks does indeed
I think its problem with compatibility with windows and linux partman.
don't forget, windows server can use dynamic disc, that is not
compatible with anything. desktop versions of windows can use this type
of partitions, after bit modification in 4 system files.
Second think, this can be
partman-auto_64_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_64.dsc
partman-auto_64.tar.gz
partman-auto_64_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Accepted:
partman-auto_64.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_64.dsc
partman-auto_64.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_64.tar.gz
partman-auto_64_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_64_powerpc.udeb
Override entries for your package:
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:07:58 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line #392764 partman: [powerpc] RAID support is broken on powermac
hardware (64bit, XServe G5)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 397973 important
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
to partitions.
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
severity 397973 important
thanks
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the
raid flag to partitions. Severity set to `serious' from `important'
I don't agree that this issue is RC. It does not match any
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 406621 normal
Bug#406621: etch/install i386 hang after first reboot on Compaq ML370 with PIII
proc
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
merge 406621 406483
Bug#406483: System fails to boot after installation
Bug#406621: etch/install i386
I am absolutely sure i did NOT select expert install.
I simply pressed enter after looking at the F2 and F£ hepl pages as to which
install methods were available... :/
I did not get questions about root password and neither have i been asked to
create a user account (which i expected to
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:47:29 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406499: Problem with xorg configuration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Debian Bug Tracking System:
retitle 406616 print-server: foomatic-gui pulls in too many unrelated
packages
Bug#406616: etch daily installation report
Changed Bug title.
I think we should remove foomatic-gui from print-server. The CUPS web
interface works well enough, and might be
severity 406621 normal
merge 406621 406483
thanks
This looks like a duplicate of #406483, therefore merging.
pgpjuUBp5ckBj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:27:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406539: problems with scsi modules
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:59:17 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406620: Installation-report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Friday 12 January 2007 16:10, Benelli Luca wrote:
I simply pressed enter after looking at the F2 and F£ hepl pages as to
which install methods were available... :/ I did not get questions
about root password and neither have i been asked to create a user
account (which i expected to happen)
reopen 392764
# Clueless closing of this bug, probably due to a confusion with another,
# separate, but similar bug.
thanks
Frans, you know that i did open two bugs, because those where two separate
issues, right ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:03:46AM -0800, Debian Bug
OK. I still don't see how this can be an issue. Can you please send us
the syslog from the installation (gzipped!)?
You can find it in /var/log/installer/syslog on your installed system.
I don't know if you want to consider this as an issue or not... I just
noticed.
Attached find the gzipped
On Thursday 11 January 2007 15:19, Grzegorz Szyszło wrote:
Severity: critical
A simple failure to reboot is not a critical issue, especially not if it
only happens for one user.
Generally right, but it cause unusable all system for all users on
server.
This report is about current (see
severity 397973 serious
# 12:18 vorlon fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID install
# should be considered RC these days, do you disagree?
thanks
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 397973 serious
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
to partitions.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
# 12:18 vorlon fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID install
# should be
On Sunday 07 January 2007 22:13, Clive Menzies wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Apart from having to disable autodetect of the Cdrom to get the media
to boot,
Hmm. Can you elaborate on that a bit? This could possibly help other as
well.
Was this a BIOS setting you had to disable? What is the exact
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:10, Sven Luther wrote:
reopen 392764
# Clueless closing of this bug, probably due to a confusion with
another, # separate, but similar bug.
thanks
Frans, you know that i did open two bugs, because those where two
separate issues, right ?
Did you even bother to
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have an original Synaptics touchpad, or rather an Alps one
(see /proc/bus/input/devices)? If you have an Alps, it is normal that you
need to tune the configuration somewhat; see docs in:
/usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/
It turns out
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 06:02:06PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:10, Sven Luther wrote:
reopen 392764
# Clueless closing of this bug, probably due to a confusion with
another, # separate, but similar bug.
thanks
Frans, you know that i did open two bugs, because
I'd like to second this problem, I was going to file a new report but saw
this one. Yesterday I installed 3 brand new Dell 1950 servers
using Etch installer 20061102. I usually go for Manual package
selection and go for leanest possible system but now this option
was missing. First I tried
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 406620
Bug#406620: Installation-report
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 406620 user-setup 1.7
Bug#406620: Installation-report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `user-setup'.
retitle 406620 user-setup: Failed
reopen 406620
reassign 406620 user-setup 1.7
retitle 406620 user-setup: Failed to ask its questions when run during default
install
thanks
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:21, Benelli Luca wrote:
I don't know if you want to consider this as an issue or not... I just
noticed.
Well, it _is_ a very
reopen 406499 !
reassign 406499 xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
severity 406499 wishlist
retitle 406499 Please provide better default configuration for Alps touchpads
thanks
On Friday 12 January 2007 18:05, Niels Möller wrote:
It turns out it's an alps (I don't really know much about PC hardware).
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 406499 !
Bug#406499: Problem with xorg configuration
Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 406499 xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
Bug#406499: Problem with xorg configuration
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports'
thank you for your support, I'll try to install that version...
--
Passa a Infostrada. ADSL e Telefono senza limiti e senza canone Telecom
http://click.libero.it/infostrada12gen07
I've also tried with an other version, debian 3.1 r2 downloaded from via ftp.
The hw-detect stops when detecting cd-rom drives, the last message is: loading
sd_mod for scsi disk support or something similar. The ide check is OK
I tried to disconnect the other cd-rom drives and the hard-drive
This issue may possibly be fixed by partman-base (101). Please test.
pgpUxGX3aiLaI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:43, you wrote:
A simple failure to reboot is not a critical issue, especially not if
it only happens for one user.
Generally right, but it cause unusable all system for all users on
server.
It is still only one system which is not even really broken, just
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:18:40PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:36:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The issue with X should be solved now, in the latest daily builds of the
installer.
OK, I'll try it out and see if it works better.
FWIW, I tried that latest
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 405971 lowmem
Bug#405971: Installation report: works on SGI 02 (mips r5k-ip32)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lowmem'.
retitle 405971 d-i goes into lowmem level1 with 64 MB on mips but shouldn't
Bug#405971:
reassign 405737 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
retitle 405737 G-I does not support some i810 graphics cards
thanks
On Sunday 07 January 2007 15:03, Roy Francis wrote:
If I simply insmod a precompiled i810fb.ko, will it work ?
I've been testing a bit with that, but at least on my laptop (which seems
to
On Friday 12 January 2007 19:53, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:18:40PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:36:25PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
The issue with X should be solved now, in the latest daily builds
of the installer.
OK,
Joerg, ping
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-07 19:40]:
* Joerg Hoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-07 18:15]:
The machine has 64M of RAM and the d-i installs in a low-memory-mode, which
It should not use lowmem mode with 64 MB RAM. Can you please open a
shell in the installer and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 405737 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#405737: Installation report : etch(daily build 20070103-21:52 ) installgui
fails on i810
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.
retitle 405737 G-I does not support some i810
On (12/01/07 18:21), Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 22:13, Clive Menzies wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Apart from having to disable autodetect of the Cdrom to get the media
to boot,
Hmm. Can you elaborate on that a bit? This could possibly help other as
well.
Was this a BIOS
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:04:07 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
* I can't say much about the tasks because I didn't use many of them
:-) Some kind of information which packages are in which task might
be helpful for advanced users (from within the installer).
Is documented in the installation
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:26:03PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Joerg, ping
Sorry, was busy all over the week.
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-07 19:40]:
* Joerg Hoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-01-07 18:15]:
The machine has 64M of RAM and the d-i installs in a
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:51:40PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
This issue may possibly be fixed by partman-base (101). Please test.
I will, will need to see if i can manually work around #403136 to reach the
partitioning step. If i create the sd* devices by hand it usually works, but
dies horribly
Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:56:50 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#406008: Installation Report - etch RC1 on Fujitsu-Siemens
MS-6309
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:51:40PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
This issue may possibly be fixed by partman-base (101). Please test.
Well, i have done an d-i install, created the devices by hand, chosen in
expert mode unstable, which i suppose will pull in the above version, but
haven't really found
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 23:11, Scott Barker wrote:
Booting the hd-media image (rc1 and daily build for Jan 2, 2007), the
tg3 NIC on the Dell Optiplex 745 was not detected. Also, the netinst CD
install (rc1) did not detect the NIC. (Note that Mandriva 2007
recognized the NIC as a tg3, and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 405098 partman-partitioning
Bug#405098: Many errors and eventual failure when Copy data from partition
used on partition with dir_index
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman-partitioning'.
severity 405098 important
Martin Pitt wrote:
Indeed the task should depend on postgresql-8.1, since this will be
the prefered version of PostgreSQL for new Etch installs.
Ok, but post-etch I would prefer it if there were a static package name
I could put in the task instead of myself tracking minor version numbers
tasksel_2.63_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tasksel_2.63.dsc
tasksel_2.63.tar.gz
tasksel_2.63_all.deb
tasksel-data_2.63_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
i don't mind full customisation, but some point in the last 24-48 hours
it would appear that the way that you're supposed to disable desktop
tasksel has broken.
Yes, see #406630.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.63_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.63_all.deb
tasksel_2.63.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.63.dsc
tasksel_2.63.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.63.tar.gz
tasksel_2.63_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.63_all.deb
Override entries
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 405098 by 406680
Bug#405098: Resizing/copying ext3 partitions with dir_index and resize_inode
not supported
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 405098 added: 406680
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: cd
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20070109-3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 20070112
Machine: Random old pentium 3.
umame
tags 396116 + pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: cd
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20070109-3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-businesscard.iso
Date: 20070112
Machine: Random old pentium 3.
umame
tags 396116 - patch
thanks
Well, the pending tag never made it, but that turns out to be OK as this
solution does not work anyway: cdebconf uses debian-installer/locale to
determine which translation is used, and not debian-installer/language.
The real solution is to change all templates that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 396116 - patch
Bug#396116: localechooser: Please set English as fallback language for floppy
installations
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:29:03 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#312681: Dropped support for real 386 processors needs to
be documented
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
tags 396109 + pending
thanks
I've committed a patch that changes the way shortlists are generated.
The shortlists now look like this (not-so-random example) :
Template: countrychooser/shortlist-nl
Type: select
Default: NL
Choices-C: BE, NL, other
Choices: Belgium, Netherlands, other
ok. v. important question: how do i control, over the netboot, what
dpkgs must _not_ be run?
i specifically want pkgsel excluded at the install time.
then, i will install it later, and manually run it, from one of my
late scripts.
or, make my own 'fixed' version (probably a backport) and
Quoting Martijn van Oosterhout (kleptog@svana.org):
OK, I'll try it out and see if it works better.
FWIW, I tried that latest weekly snapshot and it didn't install any X
related packages at all...
Weekly snapshots are *not* the daily builds.
T ochek the issue out, you should indeed use
I'm out of office until wednesday...
I don't know when the server will go into production, so i'm not sure how many
tests we can do, at the moment it's still a clean install and it will probably
need to be reinstalled as debian 3.1 (using HPDE installers) so i think i
should have the time to
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Yes, I've seen various mails/rants etc... and haven't wanted to take
part of it neither in the past, but it looks like this has gone too far,
and it's more and more looking like even perfectly good bug fixes that
are needed for most users are being rejected on the
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:58, Sven Luther wrote:
12:18 vorlon fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID
install should be considered RC these days, do you disagree?
What else is there to say ...
I am not going to fight this war, but I also refuse to treat this BR as RC
for the
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:00:51AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Steve Langasek]
Well, as dmidecode 2.8-3 was just reported to FTBFS on ia64, this
one doesn't seem to be a candidate. Please let us know when you
have another upload that works on ia64 if you want it to be
considered.
75 matches
Mail list logo
