Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
Marc
diff -Nwru debootstrap-1.0.7/debian/control debootstrap-1.0.7.he/debian/control
---
Op 01-01-2008 om 14:33 schreef Praveen A:
2007/12/31, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, it's not an issue in util-linux, but in the kernel.
Most systems don't need the option, so adding it by default would not be
the correct solution.
It would be great if the installer can try this option
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
While this works on installed system, it will
Op 31-12-2007 om 16:55 schreef Manfred Rebentisch:
I did use the expert mode, because the previous install with install was
failed (does not show many installer pages, does not install most software,
only minimal system).
Summary: 'expert' is a fancy name for detailed mode
Debian-Installer
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:52:01AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
Is it desirable for anything in the base system to use data.tar.bz2,
though? Relying on this would
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/busybox-1.1.3$ grep BZIP2 debian/config-udeb
# CONFIG_FEATURE_TAR_BZIP2 is not set
I think this is critical for we commit, or not, this patch.
Actually, the way the patch is
Op 01-01-2008 om 16:58 schreef Michel BRIAND:
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:04:43 +0100
On Monday 31 December 2007, Michel BRIAND wrote:
Speedtouch includes some firmware that are non-free. But we could
find a way to include them anyway. A special non-free netinst iso?
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:25:31AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The current debootstrap code can't handle .debs which contain a
data.tar.bz2 instead of a data.tar.bz. Attached is a fix.
While this works on installed system, it will fail on
Hello Manfred,
Op 31-12-2007 om 16:55 schreef Manfred Rebentisch:
Am Montag 31 Dezember 2007 15:56 schrieb Frans Pop:
On Thursday 27 December 2007, Manfred Rebentisch wrote:
Comments/Problems:
snip/
7. There was no possibility to add the first user
8. There was no question for the
Hello Geert,
Am Mittwoch 02 Januar 2008 13:58 schrieben Sie:
snip/
snip more/
From my point of view it is also (very (very)) hard _WHAT TO THINK_
about USB. I suggest you reply this E-mail with the relevant lines
from your report about the thing that runs wrong, plus some elaboration
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
moment?
None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and cdebootstrap fail to
unpack packages using bzip2. As dak accepts data.tar.bz2 now,
bootstrapping could be broken by such an upload
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:05:45PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
moment?
None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and cdebootstrap fail to
unpack packages using bzip2. As
Op 02-01-2008 om 14:16 schreef Manfred Rebentisch:
Is it ok to put a long report as attachement?
Euh, hard to say.
There is a technical size limit, but I don't known what that is.
And there is a personal limit, where I can speak only for myself.
Mostly is my limit lower as the technical one.
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We could of course make it work in debootstrap, by applying Marc's
patch, but continue to disallow it in the base system.
I see no point to have something available on debootstrap that isn't
allowed on base.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/busybox-1.1.3$ grep BZIP2 debian/config-udeb
# CONFIG_FEATURE_TAR_BZIP2 is not set
I think this is critical for we commit, or not,
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
moment?
None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and cdebootstrap fail to
unpack packages using bzip2. As dak accepts data.tar.bz2
#Op 02-01-2008 om 02:17 schreef Rick Thomas:
#
# Maybe this could be set for installations? It's not a good idea to set it
# for the installed config file, for just the kind of security reasons Del
# alludes to above. But it could save some long-running installations on
# difficult to access
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
#Op 02-01-2008 om 02:17 schreef Rick Thomas:
#
# Maybe this could be set for installations? It's not a good idea to set it
# for the installed config file, for just the kind of security reasons Del
# alludes to above. But it could save some
Please see this site in Subject
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and memory
for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. However, as said in another mail, I
see no point to support different set of features on installed and d-i
environments (from debootstrap POV).
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
moment?
None, but aj noted that both debootstrap and
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What packages in the base system are trying to use data.tar.bz2 at the
moment?
None, but aj
Package: installation-report
Version: 2.31
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I try to use this image CD to install debian testing:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-kde-CD-1.iso
[ ]
regards
Nothing c'n B better than our pharmas!
http://beaverbonghits.com
And when boats or ships came near him
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinstall CD
Image version: 2007-12-28; 162,4 MB (170291200 Bytes)
Date: 2007-12-28
Machine: Notebook, ASUS Z83k, VideoCard ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
Processor:AMD X2 64
Memory:2GB
Partitions: Dateisystem Typ1K-Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben%
Your message dated Wed, 2 Jan 2008 21:48:46 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#458764: Debian testing CD Installer dont work
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and
memory
for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. However, as said in another
mail, I
see no point to support
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and
memory for adding bzcat on busybox-udeb. However, as
On Jan 2, 2008, at 9:47 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:38:37PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 12:38:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Personally, I'd like to know what is the increase on space and
29 matches
Mail list logo
