Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Here's a proposed patch. Maybe a little bit overdesigned as I
tentatively check the version of the sudo package that's installed on
the system before
user-setup_1.34_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
user-setup_1.34.dsc
user-setup_1.34.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.34_all.udeb
user-setup_1.34_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To
user-setup_1.34_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.34.dsc
user-setup_1.34.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.34_all.udeb
user-setup_1.34_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.34_all.udeb
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.34_all.udeb
user-setup_1.34.dsc
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.34.dsc
user-setup_1.34.tar.gz
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.34.tar.gz
user-setup_1.34_all.deb
to main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.34_all.deb
Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:17:06 +
with message-id e1oxe94-0005e3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#597239: fixed in user-setup 1.34
has caused the Debian Bug report #597239,
regarding user-setup: Should add user to sudo group instead of modifying sudoers
to be marked as
I just built a live image with the daily installer included and noticed
it still has the bug. When I checked the cdrom-detect.postinst, it is
missing this additional line from my second patch:
-mount | grep -q 'on /cdrom' exit 0
+mount | grep -q 'on /cdrom' set_suite_and_codename exit 0
Quoting Ben Armstrong (sy...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca):
I just built a live image with the daily installer included and
noticed it still has the bug. When I checked the
cdrom-detect.postinst, it is missing this additional line from my
second patch:
-mount | grep -q 'on /cdrom' exit 0
+mount
On 19/09/10 11:05 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I think this is more because cdrom-detect hasn't been uploaded since
the fix was committed.
Ah, good, if that's all it is ...
Strange, though, since I examined the initrd and it definitely had the
older version of the patch in it. I'm going to
Hey
Sorry for the delay
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010, Matt Waddel wrote:
+ check_size kernel $(($kfilesize + 8 + 64)) $kmtdsize
The 8+64 seems to be copied from other platforms which prepend 8 bytes
of ARM assembly to set the machine id (the devio calls in the
script) and wrap
cdrom-detect_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.35.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.35.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.35_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
cdrom-detect_1.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.35.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.35.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.35_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Reject Reasons:
cdrom-detect_1.35_i386.changes file already known to dak
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Quoting Debian FTP Masters (ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org):
Reject Reasons:
cdrom-detect_1.35_i386.changes file already known to dak
Uh?
I only see 1.34 in p.qa.d.o
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I have been trying for some time how to preseed a rather complex
situation: root-on-LVM-on-LUKS-on-RAID1 . I know I could do it manually
in a fraction of the time I have already invested here, but that is
beside the point :-) Any _other_ insight you could give me would be much
appreciated:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 08:20:42AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Steve McIntyre (st...@einval.com):
Any feedback on this please? I'm hoping to get a new debian-cd
uploaded this weekend with a lot of other fixes, and it would be nice
to clear this up too.
I think you can go ahead.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 05:23:24PM +0200, Torsten Jerzembeck wrote:
...
2.) License dialogs' text overlaps the buttons at the bottom
The firmware package for the ipw2x00 chipsets presents a license dialog
during the installation and prompts to accept or decline the license.
However, the text
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 07:41:52PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 08:20:42AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Steve McIntyre (st...@einval.com):
Any feedback on this please? I'm hoping to get a new debian-cd
uploaded this weekend with a lot of other fixes, and it
Your message dated Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:30:32 +
with message-id e1oxpaq-00053q...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#594344: fixed in cdrom-detect 1.35
has caused the Debian Bug report #594344,
regarding base-installer: error: exiting on error base-installer/no_codename
to be marked as
Accepted:
cdrom-detect_1.35.dsc
to main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.35.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.35.tar.gz
to main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.35.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.35_all.udeb
to main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_1.35_all.udeb
Override entries for your package:
cdrom-detect_1.35.dsc -
Hi,
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Well, to keep the manual readable we should probably not replace Debian
with debian; as it is now. Maybe rename the existing `debian' entity
into something else like debiangnu, and then introduce debian;
expanding to Debian?
Yes, I would
Hi,
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 15 Sep 2010 10:16:46 +0200, a écrit :
Christian PERRIER, le Wed 15 Sep 2010 07:02:50 +0200, a écrit :
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
I have commited (r64720) fixes and a bit of triaging for the
Holger Wansing, le Sun 19 Sep 2010 12:58:37 +0200, a écrit :
At several places you have replaced 'Linux' to 'Debian'.
Yes, when the text was talking about the system as a whole, not only its
kernel.
In the past, there was a big effort, to make 'Debian' to not
appear in the manual directly
Hi Christian,
Can you try the exact same thing with development images?
Go to http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer
Go to daily builds
Choose the netboot images for your architecture and get the kernel
and initrd
Add to this a businesscard image
and boot this up, the same way you did
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.23
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
The next release will be called wheezy. Please add support for that.
MfG
Goswin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
base-installer_1.112_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.112.dsc
base-installer_1.112.tar.gz
base-installer_1.112_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.112_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
base-installer_1.112.dsc
to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.112.dsc
base-installer_1.112.tar.gz
to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.112.tar.gz
base-installer_1.112_all.udeb
to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.112_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.112_i386.udeb
to
Hello,
Frans Pop, le Wed 03 Dec 2008 08:13:06 +0100, a écrit :
On Wednesday 03 December 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 02 Dec 2008 23:58:05 +0100, a écrit :
If it can be done, the best place to do this would be in a
post-base-installer.d hook script. However, that
debootstrap_1.0.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To
Package: debian-installer
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After installing debian squeeze when starting the
gui the monitor turns on and off with white streaks when it is on.
-- System Information:
I am using Debian Squeeze released on 7-15-10 for X86. I have an
ATI
Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:47:07 +
with message-id e1oxvth-0004ag...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#521196: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #521196,
regarding debootstrap does not support https transport
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2010 01:47:07 +
with message-id e1oxvth-0004am...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#597461: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #597461,
regarding Please add support for wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.24_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.24.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.24.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.24_all.deb
to
apt-setup_0.47_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.47.dsc
apt-setup_0.47.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.47_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.47_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.47_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:17:07 +
with message-id e1oxxor-ko...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#595903: fixed in apt-setup 1:0.47
has caused the Debian Bug report #595903,
regarding apt-setup: Fail to set up DVD as APT source during installation
to be marked as done.
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.47_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.47_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.47_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.47_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.47_all.udeb
to main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.47_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.47.dsc
to
35 matches
Mail list logo
