Re: debian-installer: call to update translations - Bosnian

Hi, Armin Besirovic wrote: > Hi Holger, > > Eek, subversion :-D > I'll see what I can do. I probably don't have commit rights so would it be > fine if I just sent the updated files to you per email? Yes, of course, sent the file to me privately. BTW: would you be

Re: debian-installer: call to update translations - Bosnian

Hi Holger, Eek, subversion :-D I'll see what I can do. I probably don't have commit rights so would it be fine if I just sent the updated files to you per email? Cheers, Armin On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently trying to get

Re: syslinux: updating in stretch?

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 06:47:28PM +0200, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote: > >I'll wait with the pu request until I've also gotten feedback from the >CD team as you suggested. As confirmed in IRC last night - I think this all looks good too. Thanks for your work Lukas! -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge,

Bug#879755: debootstrap fails with current sid without apt-transport-https and https URLs

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.91 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, apt 1.6~alpha removed binary package apt-transport-https and therefor debootstrap with a https URL fails with dependency error: I: Checking component main on https://deb.debian.org/debian... E: Couldn't find these debs:

Re: Daily image of debian installer build fail

Hi, Tien Wano (2017-10-25): > I see file log from > https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log > > And something error log: > > Makefile:642: recipe for target > 'stamps/get_udebs-kirkwood_network-console-stamp' failed > make[2]:

Bug#879773: stretch-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-14.1+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: stretch Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, k...@debian.org Dear release team and other involved parties, I hereby ask for permission to update the

Re: Scheduling 9.3

On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hi, Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this happily makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the festive season). Accordingly I'm looking at one of: [...] 2nd December 9th December (but

Making apparmor "Priority: standard"? [Was: Bug#879590: apparmor: Decide how we enable AppArmor by default]

Hi debian-boot@! tl;dr: can I make the apparmor package Priority: standard? Context === I'm working on the last blockers towards starting the experiment I've proposed on debian-devel@ 2.5 months ago, i.e. enabling AppArmor by default for a while in testing/sid. Enabling AppArmor by default

Bug#879732: CVE-2017-15874 / CVE-2017-15873

Tags: upstream confirmed Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote... > Hi, > please see: Thanks for the heads-up, we'll try to get this fixed as soon as possible. For the moment, I'm somewhat confused about the affected distributions as listed in the security tracker. Could you please check? > CVE-2017-15873

Bug#879732: CVE-2017-15874 / CVE-2017-15873

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 07:27:42PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Tags: upstream confirmed > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote... > > > Hi, > > please see: > > Thanks for the heads-up, we'll try to get this fixed as soon as > possible. For the moment, I'm somewhat confused about the affected >

Bug#879732: CVE-2017-15874 / CVE-2017-15873

Package: busybox Version: 1:1.27.2-1 Severity: important Tags: security Hi, please see: CVE-2017-15873 The get_next_block function in archival/libarchive/decompress_bunzip2.c in BusyBox 1.27.2 has an Integer Overflow that may lead to a write access violation.