On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:41:57 +0200
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 1/ You will put files there but what happens if "apt-get clean" is run in
> a cron job while you are running debootstrap ?
>
> 2/ APT stores files there with a naming policy of its own (for instance
> it adds the
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#866401: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #866401,
regarding Please print proper error message when download fails
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844118: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #844118,
regarding debootstrap: APTCACHE for debootstrap
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#895466: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #895466,
regarding debootstrap 1.0.96 fails due to missing apt-config
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#893954: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #893954,
regarding debootstrap ignores https mirror setting, just use default http
mirror (i.e.
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#872577: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #872577,
regarding debootstrap: Handle existing /dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#872059: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #872059,
regarding No longer creates /dev/console.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#872948: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #872948,
regarding debootstrap: Debootstrap does not explain what is calls a Debian base
system
to be
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 13:06:22 +0200
Clément Hermann wrote:
> I had a look today. It looks good to me, at first glance I had concerns
> (like using hash keys in boolean context without the exists function),
> but everytime I checked further, it looked fine in context. That
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#826709: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #826709,
regarding debootstrap: fail early when debootstrapping foreign arches whose
binaries cannot
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#698677: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #698677,
regarding debootstrap: 'Release signed by unknown key' should report keyring
used
to be
Your message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2018 02:53:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890419: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.97
has caused the Debian Bug report #890419,
regarding [PATCH] Fix boostrapping libvirt LXC containers
to be marked as done.
This means
12 matches
Mail list logo