Package: src:debian-installer-netboot-images
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The debian-installer-*-netboot-* packages currently explicitly filter
out mini.iso by way of an explicit "grep -v mini.iso", which according
to git history has always been the case.
One use case for having mini.iso files on
Hi,
Wouter Verhelst (2018-06-26):
> For some reason, the netboot installer packages do not contain the
> mini.iso files. This is explicitly filtered out by way of a "grep -v
> mini.iso", which "git blame" tells me has always been the case.
>
> Anyone know (or remember) why that is so? I think
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.91
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
There is a typo in the clearfog pro DTB name: pre -> pro.
Easy enough to fix, so please find the patch below:
>From 1d19172e0326a2e2ee2a5d236bad13a99a8f88e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josua Mayer
Date:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Verhelst (2018-06-26):
> > For some reason, the netboot installer packages do not contain the
> > mini.iso files. This is explicitly filtered out by way of a "grep -v
> > mini.iso", which "git blame" tells me has
Hello,
On Mon, 28 May 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> debian-boot@: the requested revert looks fine to me, bonus points if it
> comes with a (short) summary of these reasons in changelog, so that they
> can be emphasized in the release announcement. :)
I reverted the change in git:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 28 May 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > debian-boot@: the requested revert looks fine to me, bonus points if it
> > comes with a (short) summary of these reasons in changelog, so that they
> > can be emphasized
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #902432 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: There is a typo in Clearfog Pro DTB
name
Added tag(s) pending.
--
902432: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902432
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Wouter,
Wouter Verhelst (2018-06-26):
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Anyway: no specific opinion on whether shipping (sometimes multiple)
> > mini.iso is a good idea. Open a wishlist bug report against dini source
> > and see what regular dini
Hi Hideki,
I can confirm this patch fixes the initial issue, but installing some
packages with apt after gives me some issues:
/lib/ld-linux-ar/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3: No such file or directory
Version 1.0.101 does not cause these issues.
I will investigate this more this week and get back to
Netboot installers needs to have core drivers, which it is lacking at this
moment. I've added additional drivers into 'initrd.gz' of netboot installer
of debian 8.9 and problem is solved. Before adding these drivers was
getting the below error into syslog and installation was broken :
Jun 25
Hi,
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I think this is a glitch in the l10n-sync script. Given that these
> strings are in sublevel 1 in the package's POT files AND in the master
> files, they are NOT automatically moved to SL2.
>
> My aadvice would be to :
>
> - manually drop them from the package's
Hi,
For some reason, the netboot installer packages do not contain the
mini.iso files. This is explicitly filtered out by way of a "grep -v
mini.iso", which "git blame" tells me has always been the case.
Anyone know (or remember) why that is so? I think that having .iso files
on a VM host that
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#899155: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #899155,
regarding vmdebootstrap: command failed: umount /tmp/tmp... | ERROR:
/tmp/tmp.../etc/machine-id: Device or resource busy
to be
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901717: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #901717,
regarding debootstrap: Version 1.0.102 breaks use of file mirrors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901717: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #901717,
regarding debootstrap: Version 1.0.102 breaks use of file mirrors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 20:41:13 +0900
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.104
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By:
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > I think this is a glitch in the l10n-sync script. Given that these
> > strings are in sublevel 1 in the package's POT files AND in the master
> > files, they are NOT automatically moved to SL2.
> >
> > My aadvice would be to :
>
Hi Raphaël,
Raphael Hertzog (2018-06-26):
> I reverted the change in git:
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/pkgsel/commit/2b9b594855a409fa6d03f259ccca4b1a1bd4727b
ACK, thanks for the notice.
> I haven't uploaded the package yet. I had to reword the debconf
> template. Is the modified
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Hi all,
as a follow-up on #902020, I looked into the build process of armhf
installation media. As I am not very familliar with the build process
and the history of the different components, I would like to post some
observations and a draft patch
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> The use of “you” seems to be one of the common errors I mentioned above.
> We tend to avoid pointing fingers at users.
>
> Hrm. Grepping across our packages' templates, I see a lot of “you”s so I
> might just be misremembering. Or maybe we've tried
20 matches
Mail list logo
