Hello
i try to install a woody release with the 3.0.23
floppy disks
when i try to install the base system from ftp.fr.debian.org or another server, i've
this error.
"Serveur non disponible ou n'abrite pas de fichiers Release."
translation : "The server maybe down or invalide release file"
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 20020521
Severity: important
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux pc1b031-03 2.4.18-bf2.4
The network card 3C905C does not work if I use the CDROM installation
from ISO (Mai 14 2002), with flavour bf24, but if I create the 2
floppies
severity 147640 normal
tags 147640 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
The network card 3C905C does not work if I use the CDROM installation
What does this mean? Load the module and you can go ahead.
from ISO (Mai 14 2002), with flavour bf24, but if I create the 2
There are no official ISOs.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 147640 normal
Bug#147640: boot-floppies: network card 3C905C does not work under flavour bf24
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 147640 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#147640: boot-floppies: network card 3C905C does not work under flavour bf24
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 2910
Bug#2910: [fixed in mainline (3.1)] GCC accepts multi-line strings without \ or c
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Ian Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 2910 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#2910: [fixed in mainline (3.1)] GCC accepts
* thomas poindessous
| I added a function in libd-i. This function is used in netcfg.
| Could someone commit this change please ? And is there any plan to release
| libd-i, because ddetect and netcfg use utils.c which is libd-i.
applied to my working tree, will check libdebian-installer in in
* Andre Luis Lopes
| On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 03:31:03PM -0700, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
| Repository: debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/modules/frontend/text
| who:tfheen
| time: Sat May 18 15:31:03 PDT 2002
| Log Message:
|l18n implementation
|
|
| Files:
|
Repository: debian-installer/libd-i/debian
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 05:54:02 PDT 2002
Log Message:
renaming libd-i to libdebian-installer
Files:
removed:changelog control copyright dirs docs libd-i.postinst rules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Repository: debian-installer/libd-i
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 05:54:36 PDT 2002
Log Message:
renaming libd-i to libdebian-installer
Files:
removed:Makefile README d-i.c d-i.h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Repository: debian-installer/libdebian-installer
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 05:56:24 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Directory /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/libdebian-installer added to the
repository
Files:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Repository: debian-installer/libdebian-installer/debian
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 05:57:45 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Directory /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/libdebian-installer/debian added to the
repository
Files:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Repository: debian-installer/libdebian-installer
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 05:58:21 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Rename libd-i to libdebian-installer
Files:
added: Makefile README debian-installer.c debian-installer.h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Repository: debian-installer/libdebian-installer/debian
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 05:58:21 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Rename libd-i to libdebian-installer
Files:
added: changelog control copyright dirs docs libd-i.postinst rules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Repository: debian-installer/tools/ddetect
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 06:04:07 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Add patch from thomas poindessous to switch to libdebian-installer.
Also remove now-unused utils.[ch]
Files:
changed:Makefile ethdetect.c
removed:utils.c utils.h
Repository: debian-installer/tools/ddetect/debian
who:tfheen
time: Tue May 21 06:04:07 PDT 2002
Log Message:
Add patch from thomas poindessous to switch to libdebian-installer.
Also remove now-unused utils.[ch]
Files:
changed:control
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* thomas poindessous
| Ok, this patch removes the use of utils.c and uses libd-i :
mostly applied, changed d-i to libdebian-installer and made it a build
dependency instead of mangling LDFLAGS and CFLAGS.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is
* David Kimdon
| IMO just upload with the new name, from what I remember he'll be okay
| with that (assuming the library name is changed on disk as well.
done.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its
* thomas poindessous
| just a very little patch for cpu_detect and libdiscover. It works on my
| system.
applied some time ago.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
* Thomas Poindessous
| Hi, another patch (which works) :
also applied some time ago.
| And just a thing, maybe it would be a good idea to auto-generate all the
| .h in the makefile
Probably, got a patch?
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 02:00:03PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
On Mon, 20 May 2002 13:39:53 -0700
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:13:08PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
in the source package of the boot-floppies I found a question that can be
partially
On Mon, 20 May 2002 22:23:56 -0700
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# what about: fi ja ko ? do they need to have charsets?
LATIN1 should also work fine for Finnish, nothing special here except for
umlauts.
I've committed your patch, thanks.
Do you have an idea
* thomas poindessous
| Hi, a little cleaning patch. And btw, I was trying to do some change in
| tools/selectdevice. It uses libkdetect, but since there is not
| libkdetect.so, it won't compile. I'm not sure I'm using the right method to
| compile and test. What is the right method to compile
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:51:07AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
It'd be better if all architectures could sync on 3.0.23 reasonably
quickly, but any that don't will just stick with 3.0.22.
I have just uploaded b-f 3.0.23 for s390 so all 11 architectures are
in sync now.
--
Stefan Gybas
--
Repository: boot-floppies/utilities/dbootstrap/po
who:wouter
time: Tue May 21 08:33:23 PDT 2002
Log Message:
more translation
Files:
changed:nl.po
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I forgot to explain that I saw the bug during a french installation.
--
---
Segura
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
I have managed to successfully dd the bf2.4 rescue.bin to a floppy and I've
replaced linux.bin with my own compiled kernel (having run rdev.sh).
This rescue floppy successfully boots and allows me to format and partition
my hard drive. I've also been able to setup networking.
But, as soon as I
I have managed to successfully dd the bf2.4 rescue.bin to a floppy and
I've replaced linux.bin with my own compiled kernel (having run rdev.sh).
This rescue floppy successfully boots and allows me to format and
partition my hard drive. I've also been able to setup networking.
But, as
I have managed to successfully dd the bf2.4 rescue.bin to a floppy and I've
replaced linux.bin with my own compiled kernel (having run rdev.sh).
This rescue floppy successfully boots and allows me to format and partition
my hard drive. I've also been able to setup networking.
But, as soon as I
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 05:33:51PM +0100, David Murphy wrote:
I'd really appreciate any guidance, as I've been hitting my head against
this for a couple of days now!
This mailing list is for discussions regarding development of the
installation system, not for technical support. Try
[EMAIL
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 05:15:20PM +0100, David Murphy wrote:
I have managed to successfully dd the bf2.4 rescue.bin to a floppy and I've
replaced linux.bin with my own compiled kernel (having run rdev.sh).
This rescue floppy successfully boots and allows me to format and partition
my hard
Would you please stop sending the same message repeatedly?
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 05:45:03PM +0100, David Murphy wrote:
I have managed to successfully dd the bf2.4 rescue.bin to a floppy and I've
replaced linux.bin with my own compiled kernel (having run rdev.sh).
This rescue floppy
Accepted:
install-doc_3.0.23_s390.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/install-doc_3.0.23_s390.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
install-doc_3.0.23_mips.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/install-doc_3.0.23_mips.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
install-doc_3.0.23_alpha.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/install-doc_3.0.23_alpha.deb
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
boot-floppies_3.0.23.dsc
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_3.0.23.dsc
boot-floppies_3.0.23.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/boot-floppies_3.0.23.tar.gz
install-doc_3.0.23_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/b/boot-floppies/install-doc_3.0.23_powerpc.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Manuel Segura wrote:
I forgot to explain that I saw the bug during a french installation.
I suspect the French translation has overly long messages.
Would you please send us the exact text that you see, so that we
can determine which messages (and how
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#105621: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#140980: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#141102: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:08 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#139418: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142305: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142473: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#141497: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142305: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142481: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142267: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#143991: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#143046: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142993: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#144267: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#145904: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#146310: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#142622: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:10 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#144566: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 21 May 2002 13:17:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#146479: fixed in boot-floppies 3.0.23
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Howdy,
I can't contact the submitter. Could someone who speaks French
please investigate the problem he reported?
Matt
- Forwarded message from System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Undeliverable: Bug#147260: more info on bug 147260
From: System Administrator [EMAIL
package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2 for Intel x86
when I boot from the linux boot disk it
says Loading.. and then I get this scrolling up my
screen continiously
"AX:0212
BX:6E00
CX:5001
DX:
0400"
Please help
Do any debian packages support splashimage= support for grub? Try as I
might, this topic is difficult to find info on, although seemlingly there
is absolutely no support for splashimages in grub on debian systems. I
also read something about the splashimage= command being supported in
.91 grub
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 06:16:17PM -0700, Ryan Sutton wrote:
package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2 for Intel x86
when I boot from the linux boot disk it says Loading..
and then I get this scrolling up my screen continiously
AX:0212
BX:6E00
CX:5001
DX:
Hello,
as I noted from earlier messages, there's a lack of testers for i386
tftpboot. Fortunately I'm in a situation that I'm able to test
tftp-booting on Intel ISP1100 hardware (they use Intel network chips with
netboot support) and on off-the-shelf PCs using 3c905C cards. At least
until the
Repository: boot-floppies/documentation/ja
who:kubota
time: Tue May 21 21:23:01 PDT 2002
Log Message:
* update translation; change of 1.11 - 1.12 in English does not
affect Japanese because the change is related to grammertical fix.
* handling of mdash; should be taken care
61 matches
Mail list logo
