On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 06:03:38PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Anthony Towns wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 01:39:21AM:
We can stick with boot-floppies for Woody+1 and release Debian-4.0 with
DI ;)
No, no we can't.
You like argumenting with semi-technical reasons - so
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 05:49, Timshel Knoll wrote:
The bigger issue is that parted is very strict about the partition
tables it reads, so parted will not work well with inconsistent / dodgy
partition tables which may have been caused by other programs. The
ability to resize filesystems in the
#include hallo.h
Anthony Towns wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 04:53:26PM:
We can stick with boot-floppies for Woody+1 and release Debian-4.0 with
DI ;)
No, no we can't.
You like argumenting with semi-technical reasons - so which one is it
this time?
Good grief, you _weren't_
Hello,
Why do you still build using sid packages? We switched to Woody a while
ago.
Great, thanks. boot-floppies doesn't work with debootstrap,
python2.1-xml and fileutils from sid.
But isn't packages in SID which will be merged into woody?
BTW, it seems that I hit another problems:
I:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 02:30:15PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Anthony Towns wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 04:53:26PM:
We can stick with boot-floppies for Woody+1 and release Debian-4.0 with
DI ;)
No, no we can't.
You like argumenting with semi-technical
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:36:11AM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 05:49, Timshel Knoll wrote:
The bigger issue is that parted is very strict about the partition
tables it reads, so parted will not work well with inconsistent / dodgy
partition tables which may have been
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:54:01PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Why do you still build using sid packages? We switched to Woody a while
ago.
Great, thanks. boot-floppies doesn't work with debootstrap,
python2.1-xml and fileutils from sid.
But isn't packages in SID which will be
* Eduard Bloch
| Nope. The smiley was for Debian-4.0. If we cannot guarantee stable DI in
| appropriate time, the whole distribution should not wait for it.
We can't guarantee anything, but we _will_ have a stable d-i in
appropriate time. We _must_ have a stable d-i in time.
The alternative
* Chris Tillman
| For the installer, porting is a major effort, because architectural
| differences are greatest when dealing with the hardware at a low level
| such as during partitioning/booting. i386 is the _best_-understood.
True. Help for other architectures is appreciated, and needed.
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 15:05, Chris Tillman wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to write an API to fdisk so we could fall back to
it underneath without affecting the presentation?
Sure, it would be possible, but it's gonna be a chunk of extra work. I
would much rather put the effort into making
Hello,
Did you do make distclean? I think that would take care of that, and it
would be a necessity after being in sid.
Of course I did. The problem seems to be with duplicates.
install, from an older fileutils (woody) did not complain, but the one in
sid does.
[ Free Software ISOs -
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm expecting some working installation systems (PGI, d-i, whatever)
within a couple of months... (i386 only, and other limitations, sure,
but working nevertheless)
PGI works now. As for parted's stability, we have been using it since
Progeny Debian,
At 5:35 +0200 7/16/02, Matt Kraai wrote:
tag 152845 pending
thanks
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:50:54PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
I think it should go away too. I suppose a person could want to
build their own debs.tar if the archive version had been left to get out
of date, and they needed
Well, I can confirm that this happens for me too with the current woody
tftpboot.img. But I'm fairly sure I've been able to install potato at
some point in the past, unlike the original poster by the looks of
things.
It seems that this has to be either a problem either with silo or the
tftp
#include hallo.h
Tollef Fog Heen wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 04:58:19PM:
| Nope. The smiley was for Debian-4.0. If we cannot guarantee stable DI in
| appropriate time, the whole distribution should not wait for it.
We can't guarantee anything, but we _will_ have a stable d-i in
password.txt
Description: Binary data
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
And do you think it is a good idea to add mozilla-locale-fr to the
French task ?
In this case, I think mozilla-locale-de-at, mozilla-locale-gl-es and
mozilla-locale-ja should also be added to the corresponding tasks.
Yes we can add them. However, instead of dragging
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 152845 - pending
Bug#152845: debootstrap example
Tags removed: pending
reassign 152845 debootstrap
Bug#152845: debootstrap example
Bug reassigned from package `install-doc' to `debootstrap'.
retitle 152845 basedebs.tar creation undocumented
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:43:00AM -0500, Eric Gillespie wrote:
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm expecting some working installation systems (PGI, d-i, whatever)
within a couple of months... (i386 only, and other limitations, sure,
but working nevertheless)
PGI works now.
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 00:58, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
in order to get debian-installer into working shape, it is obvious
that the user has some way to partition the hard drive. An
auto-partitioner will probably only need debconf as it's UI. However,
manual partitioning using debconf will be
#include hallo.h
Philip Blundell wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 09:03:29PM:
Ah, I just noticed that there is already a newt-based parted frontend
(nparted), which will do for dialog mode. The standard parted should
suffice for readline mode; I think it should be easy enough to put
I tested
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 21:14, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Philip Blundell wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 09:03:29PM:
Ah, I just noticed that there is already a newt-based parted frontend
(nparted), which will do for dialog mode. The standard parted should
suffice for readline mode; I think it should
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
Philip Blundell wrote on Tue Jul 16, 2002 um 09:03:29PM:
Ah, I just noticed that there is already a newt-based parted frontend
(nparted), which will do for dialog mode. The standard parted should
suffice for
Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit:
We can't guarantee anything, but we _will_ have a stable d-i in
appropriate time. We _must_ have a stable d-i in time.
The alternative is PGI (or both). Not b-f.
The reality is: The current alternative is b-f only,
and there are a few
24 matches
Mail list logo
