Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
The new netinst iso of today gave me
Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting
This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours.
Still the same problem.
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 12:42:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Nowicki Christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-25 10:18]:
I've tried to install Debian GNU/Linux sarge on an server with a Promise
FastTrack Raid Card (Model : FastTrak TX2000) :
Is this common RAID array controller
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 08:27:45PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote:
Hello,
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-27 16:21]:
| powerpc: Very shakey
| - Daily building is down; Thorsten Sauter needs a build machine
| and bruckner is down, voltaire is not set up right. Needs a
|
Package: netcfg
Tags: d-i
Severity: wishlist
Am Sam, den 27.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 10:46:
- Forwarded message from Thorsten Sauter [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
* Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-26 12:33]:
| * Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-20 11:10]:
|
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Detecting hardware...
Loading modules...
Detected module '[Unknown]' for 'Unknown MATSHITACD-RW CW-8121'
Detected modules 'sungem' for 'Apple Computer Inc. Uninorth GMAC'
Trying to load module 'sungem'
Could not load driver
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Detecting hardware...
[...]
then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage'
This must be the
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:45, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Detecting hardware...
[...]
Ideally the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:46:17AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
After the normal hardware recognition by the kernel the system did not
start correctly init, giving this error message:
Freeing unused kernel memory: 184k init 4k chrp 36k prep
Warning: unable to open an
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Detecting hardware...
[...]
then is says: 'Missing modules 'sungem, usb-storage'
This must be the problem. 2.4.22-3 says :
kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc (2.4.22-3)
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:23, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:46:17AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
[...]
CONFIG_DEVFS_FS=y
# CONFIG_DEVFS_MOUNT is not set
Perhaps this means you need to boot with devfs=mount,dall
Is that not the case on all
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:55:15PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:45, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 12:42:55PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 12:30, Sven Luther ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:48:14PM +0100, Giuseppe
List,
I have purchased a 1GHz 15 PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an
installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my
iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for
those being back up, so I am still trying to use this one.
My installation
Barry Hawkins wrote:
List,
I have purchased a 1GHz 15 PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an
installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of my
iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for
those being back up, so I am still trying to
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:04:30AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
Ah, that explains it.
The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m.
I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with
the normal modules or something such. The
reassign 222374 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386
retitle 222374 vesafb is a module, but cannot work that way
thanks
Summarising:
vesafb is built as a module in the debian kernel, and d-i tries to
modprobe it, falling back on the less portable vga16fb if it fails to
load. We're told that there is no way
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 222374 kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386
Bug#222374: d-i melts screen on sis 630 laptop
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel-image-2.4.22-1-386'.
retitle 222374 vesafb is a module, but cannot work that way
Bug#222374: d-i melts
On Dec 30, 2003, at 10:25 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
Barry Hawkins wrote:
List,
I have purchased a 1GHz 15 PowerBook G4 that I am trying to run an
installation for using the sarge business card install. The date of
my
iso is November 19th. I haven't seen any news of the old location for
those being
Sven Luther wrote:
Ah, that explains it.
The -small config has CONFIG_SUNGEM=m as well as CONFIG_USB_STORAGE=m.
I guess what happens here is that you are using the -small kernel with
the normal modules or something such. The -small has a lot more stuff
modular so it can fit on a miboot
Erich Waelde wrote:
Boot:
net DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium
Yes, I would like to have an expert switch, too :-)
There is one now..
choose mirror ...
proxy = http://192.168.1.42:80/apt-cacher/
will not work for installer download, but would be nice.
Details?
mounting partitions:
Barry Hawkins wrote:
Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I
almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my
curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit
the effort to file an installation report? If not, I
Package: base-config
Version: 2.03
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #225344
Hi,
Note that this bug breaks debootstrap (aptitude is not installed,
base-config can't be configured, debootstrap exits with an errorcode) and
consequently pbuilder, which expects debootstrap to succeed.
IMHO,
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-29 20:36]:
| Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| there is currently no daily build. I have started it, but now pear.d.o
| is not recovered/opened for me. So that's the same like powerpc...
| waiting.
|
| I have created a cdrom-set, so I thing daily cdrom's should
* Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-30 10:54]:
Package: netcfg
Tags: d-i
I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg.
As I said before, this has been filed as #214491.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
The new netinst iso of today gave me
Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting
This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours.
Still the same problem.
Well I was
Debian-installer-version: manty netinst CD, built today
Method: cd install in vmware
Machine: vmware
Memory: 90 mb
Root Device: 300 mb virtual scsi
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [E]
Detect CD: [O]
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Error were encountered while procession :
base-config
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep not found
This problem is fixed in the latest CD images, built about half an hour
ago, and available in the usual place.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Harald Dunkel wrote:
The new netinst iso of today gave me
Loading di-utils-devicefiles failed for unknown reasons. Aborting
This will be fixed in the next build, which will happen in a few hours.
Still the same problem.
Well I was
Hi folks,
I just successfully installed Sarge netinst on my spare partition. But
after a reboot there was a problem: The network wasn't up. And base-config
did not allow me to configure anything else but a PPP connection.
I'm not sure whether this is a problem of base-config, or of d-i.
Regards
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
of course, I can do this. I will try the demo this weekend. And I know,
that the installer itself works good on my hppa machine.
If you wait until this weekend, there's a good chance it will miss beta
2. FWIW.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
It did not configure the network. netcfg is on the cd, but udeb_include is
broken. I am working right now on fixing that (I broke it :-( )
Missing udeb_include on the cd. Manty has fixed this and updated the
images.
Base-config 2.0 is on there, but it somehow got the debconf
Joey Hess wrote:
Barry Hawkins wrote:
Many thanks! I will down load the new one and give it a go. I
almost tried cat - darn! I may try the old CD just to satisfy my
curiosity. Because my November iso is currently so old, would it benefit
the effort to file an installation
Harald Dunkel wrote:
I just successfully installed Sarge netinst on my spare partition. But
after a reboot there was a problem: The network wasn't up. And base-config
did not allow me to configure anything else but a PPP connection.
I'm not sure whether this is a problem of base-config, or
stefan wrote:
trying the swiss german installation:
- not all translations well done, screens are mixed german/ english
German should be at 100% now, with only possibly a very few things (like
cfdisk) not translated. I think you did an install right before most of
that got in.
- was
Package: prebaseconfig
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
I just tried a CD install current to today, and /target/etc/mtab did not
get created. It seems that the mtab hack I put in prebaseconfig does not
work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux
Just installed using todays build. Everything installed fine but there
was not way to set up my network. The computer is on a LAN and the
install options only setup a ISP connection. With Beta 1 I was able to
enter all the information to connect to my LAN. I can enter the info
from the command
Deron Wilkerson wrote:
Just installed using todays build. Everything installed fine but there
was not way to set up my network. The computer is on a LAN and the
install options only setup a ISP connection. With Beta 1 I was able to
enter all the information to connect to my LAN. I can enter
Hello.
May I ask what's wrong with status webpage?
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/
It shows that Polish has untranslated choose-mirror.po file.
I've checked this file and it seems that it's correctly translated and
up-to-date. So what's wrong?
regards
fEnIo
--
_
Debian-installer-version: today's (second build) netinst CD from manty's home dir
Method: booting from a 128 mb usb keychain with hd-media initrd I built,
and the d-i ISO on it
Machine: LC2000 laptop from LinuxCertified, Inc.
Processor: 2.66 Ghz P4
Memory: 516 mb
Root Device: 36 gb IDE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moving libdiscover.so.1.0.0 to libdiscover.so.1.
Moving libc.so.6 to libc.so.6.
Moving libdebconfclient.so.0 to libdebconfclient.so.0.
Moving libdl.so.2 to libdl.so.2.
Moving libdebian-installer.so.4 to libdebian-installer.so.4.
Moving libm.so.6 to libm.so.6.
Moving
Hello all,
I did a simple installation (2 partitions / + /boot, no LVM, no
raid) on my crash box. This is what I found.
The bad news:
Using mantys netinst CD (2003-12-30) with net boot method
still fails on the already reported di-utils-devicefiles.
The good news:
Using expert, i.e.
base-config_2.04_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.04.dsc
base-config_2.04.tar.gz
base-config_2.04_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
I used the current Sarge netinst CD to install Sid. It worked.
But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i.
Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some
pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver
recommends wordlist, which aptitude resolved
Am Mit, den 24.12.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 13:46:
Hi
I fixed discover2 support in hw-detect yesterday (already in the archive
thanks to joeyh) and now I uploaded discover2 packages for testing to my
website:
http://www.soziologie.ch/~steinlin/d-i/discover2/
I renamed the packages
These packages have many translation updates, and have not been
uploaded. I cannot upload them either, due to their archutectures.
Someone had better do it soon if you care about getting a fully
translated beta 2 on their architectures:
yaboot-installer
aboot-installer
Harald Dunkel wrote:
I used the current Sarge netinst CD to install Sid. It worked.
But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i.
Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some
pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver
recommends
[Joey == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:09:28 -0500]
Vince Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W
Vince ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so With output: readelf:
Vince Error: Cannot stat input file
Vince ./tmp/cdrom/tree/lib/libdiscover.so.
Joey jared_rhin1 Command failed with
Accepted:
base-config_2.04.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04.dsc
base-config_2.04.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04.tar.gz
base-config_2.04_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.04_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 225057
bugreporter-udeb_0.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
prebaseconfig_0.47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Thank you for the detailed report.
Erich Waelde wrote:
The bad news:
Using mantys netinst CD (2003-12-30) with net boot method
still fails on the already reported di-utils-devicefiles.
The good news:
Using expert, i.e. installing from CD rather than from apt
repository on the
Accepted:
prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47.dsc
prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47.tar.gz
prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/prebaseconfig/prebaseconfig_0.47_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting
Accepted:
bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10.dsc
bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10.tar.gz
bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/bugreporter-udeb/bugreporter-udeb_0.10_all.udeb
Announcing to
tag 225545 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:51:25 -0500
Source: prebaseconfig
Binary: prebaseconfig
Architecture: source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-12-30 20:14, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
Hello.
May I ask what's wrong with status webpage?
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/
It shows that Polish has untranslated choose-mirror.po file.
I've checked this file
Hello Harri,
aptitude options dependency handling:
unselect: install suggested packages automatically and
unselect: install recommended packages automatically
First thing I do :-) and the world looks nicer for me.
Erich
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 21:09, Joey Hess wrote:
jared_rhin1 Command failed with status 1 : readelf --all -W
./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so
jared_rhin1 With output: readelf: Error: Cannot stat input file
./tmp/netboot/tree/lib/libdiscover.so.
I put an updated mklibs in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 225545 + fixed
Bug#225545: mtab creation hack does not work
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
[Joey == [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:44:19 -0500]
But I am not sure whether aptitude is a good choice for d-i.
Surely aptitude is a great tool, but sometimes it choses some
pretty unlikely packets to resolve dependencies (e.g. xscreensaver
recommends wordlist, which aptitude
busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
busybox-cvs_20031212-3.dsc
busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz
busybox-cvs_20031212-3_s390.deb
busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00:
Some ugly things during boot:
- discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module
failed to load with No such device.
According to pci.lst these devices need the i810_rng module:
80862418bridge i810_rng
Accepted:
busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-static_20031212-3_s390.deb
busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb
to pool/main/b/busybox-cvs/busybox-cvs-udeb_20031212-3_s390.udeb
busybox-cvs_20031212-3.diff.gz
to
Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me):
i386: On track for beta 2
powerpc: Very shakey
ia64: Likely to be in beta 2
mips: May be in beta 2
arm: Uncertian
The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have
d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this even likely to be released with
yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc
yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Il mar, 2003-12-30 alle 22:39, Joey Hess ha scritto:
These packages have many translation updates, and have not been
uploaded. I cannot upload them either, due to their archutectures.
Someone had better do it soon if you care about getting a fully
translated beta 2 on their architectures:
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Martin Michlmayr um 17:28:
* Gaudenz Steinlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-12-30 10:54]:
Package: netcfg
Tags: d-i
I submitted this email as a wishlist bug to netcfg.
As I said before, this has been filed as #214491.
sorry about that. I only checked the bug
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for
all relevant image types.
cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point
floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's not something I'm
concerned about.
Hello all,
I just pressed send and reload and there was a new netinst-image!
Well, then just try this also.
Debian-installer-version:
30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
just to be sure:
Accepted:
yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10.dsc
yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.10.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_0.0.10_powerpc.udeb
to
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2003-12-30 (11:01)
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
(Same config as in #220014).
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard
Package: debian-installer
Tags: d-i
Severity: minor
In the CVS head as d-i as of 2003-12-30, a 'make cd_image' on my
machine fails with:
mkfs.msdos 2.10 (22 Sep 2003)
# mkfs.msdos gets the mode wrong (bug filed)
chmod 644 dest/cdrom-image.img.new
mcopy -idest/cdrom-image.img.new
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:17:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#225360: fixed in busybox-cvs 20031212-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I don't know where the dot comes from neither...
I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all...
The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname
issue (prebaseconfig copied /etc/hosts to /target/etc/mailname).
The patch I attached
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:23:44PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00:
What on earth? Taking a look at /etc/mailname, I see:
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.1 debian. debian
Something is _very_ broken here. FWIW, my /etc/hosts has the
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Joey Hess wrote (with lots snipped out by me):
i386: On track for beta 2
powerpc: Very shakey
ia64: Likely to be in beta 2
mips: May be in beta 2
arm: Uncertian
The buildds are still down for ARM. And apparently it doesn't have
d-i kernels yet. Ow. Is this
Blars Blarson wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a. Work to get the debian-installer package cleanly building for
all relevant image types.
cdrom and netboot are now cleanly building. At some future point
floppy may be added for sparc32, but that's not
debian-installer_20031230_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20031230.dsc
debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz
debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb
debian-installer-images_20031230_i386.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
/etc/mailname does not have the same format as /etc/hostname, so this
change to netcfg royally stuffed it. Please test changes before
committing!
I think that all netcfg has to do is actually set the hostname. It could
do this by echoing the hostname to a file in /proc, for example. exim4's
Am Mit, den 31.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 01:06:
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I don't know where the dot comes from neither...
I'm wondering where /etc/hostname comes from at all...
The wired /etc/mailname comes from my totaly wrong fix for the mailname
issue (prebaseconfig copied
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:29:58PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
alpha: ???
Used to be one of the better supported arches, but it doesn't look
like anyone's worked on it since October?
Where d-i work is concerned, alpha is my next priority. My first
priority is getting a set of working
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:49:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Fixed in NMU of prebaseconfig 0.47
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Am Die, den 30.12.2003 schrieb Joey Hess um 22:00:
Some ugly things during boot:
- discover decided I should have a i810_rng module, but this module
failed to load with No such device.
According to pci.lst these devices need the i810_rng module:
80862418
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:00:24PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Total time to install Debian: 5 minutes 15 seconds
Wow. :-)
klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use
Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found
anything that has helped.
FWIW I've seen this too. I
So why does rootskel need /var/run? Just curious..
+ * Matt Kraai
+- Create /var/run.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
I don't feel this is the right fix. /etc/hostname does not have the same
format as /etc/hosts either! Instead, why not just make netcfg
echo the hostname to /proc/sys/kernel/hostname. I belive that exim4's
postinst will do the right thing if the hostname is actually set. We
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:17:33 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#225057: fixed in base-config 2.04
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 214491 netcfg
Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `netcfg'.
severity 214491 wishlist
Bug#214491: need wireless configure udeb
Severity set to `wishlist'.
merge 214491 225512
Bug#214491:
Accepted:
debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20031230_i386.deb
debian-installer_20031230.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20031230.dsc
debian-installer_20031230.tar.gz
to
Package: debian-installer
Tags: d-i
I wrote:
klogd: orinoco_cs: RequestIRQ: Resource in use
Not sure what do to about that. I've googled around but have not found
anything that has helped.
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
FWIW I've seen this too. I never solved it, but AFAIK somebody I knew
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:47:15 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#206531: Problems building d-i after upgrading Sid chroot
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#222631: fixed in netcfg 0.40
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Erich Waelde wrote:
Debian-installer-version:
30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from
http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
just to be sure:
md5sum sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso
8d88a368fc2225144b8592d75684
It seems that the net.gz image on the netinst cd is some old and broken
thing that includes netcfg-static and netcfg-dhcp instead of the new
combined netcfg. If I build my own netboot initrd, I get one with the
new netcfg in it. I downloaded netboot-initrd.gz from sjogren's daily
builds, and it
I have a home page, and you had better take your
home page off my computer beforeI call the Better Business Bureau!
Who the hell do you think you are, installing this shit operating system on my
computer without even asking me first?
You'd better send me an e-mail how to get rid of
you
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line d-i pcmcia issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:12:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
As I do appear to be making some progress on getting an XFS-enabled d-i
image together, I thought I would give everyone a status update. The
2.4.22-based kernel-image packages are now sitting in the NEW queue;
although no real
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:56:41 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line d-i pcmcia issues
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:33:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#224644: fixed in netcfg 0.40
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:57:38 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
98 matches
Mail list logo