Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hmmm, what happens if translators update, then one templates is
> > changed, debconf-updatepo is run (which changes PO-Revision-Date),
> Are you sure? I have made a small test changing the date of the .pot
> and running debconf-updatepo -- only
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> What say you gentlemen?
Based on what I know of partman and with newbie installation in mind,
I would definitely say "go fo partman as default on i386 and as an
option on other archs (except powerpc if it works OK for them?)".
It's some time since I teste
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.39_powerpc.udeb
brltty-modules
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
brltty-modules
Accepted:
debian-installer-demo_20040227_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20040227_i386.deb
debian-installer_20040227.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040227.dsc
debian-installer_20040227.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-instal
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 28 Feb 2004, http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: didn't get that far
Date: 28 Feb 2004, 7 p.m. MST
Method: Installed using "net" option off of netinst CD.
Tried using distro.ibiblio.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:25:23PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I think the logic is so simple, that if the translators update the
> > PO-Revision-Date and the maintainer of the package inserts a
> > correct revision date (both should be the case), then it will
> > definitely work. But, lik
> > partman-ext3_9_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override
> > says optional.
>
> Partman needs his sidekick Partman-Ext3 to help him format big hard
> drive partitions. Or something like that; it needs to be standard cause
> our users want ext3 support, curse them!
yeah, damn us a
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
partman-ext3_9_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the pac
Accepted:
partman-ext3_9.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_9.dsc
partman-ext3_9.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_9.tar.gz
partman-ext3_9_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_9_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_11.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_11.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_11.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_11.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_11_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfil
Debian Installer wrote:
> partman-ext3_9_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Partman needs his sidekick Partman-Ext3 to help him format big hard
drive partitions. Or something like that; it needs to be standard cause
our users want ext3 support, curse them!
--
s
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
partman-auto_5_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the pack
Accepted:
partman-auto_5.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_5.dsc
partman-auto_5.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_5.tar.gz
partman-auto_5_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_5_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to
partman-ext3_9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_9.dsc
partman-ext3_9.tar.gz
partman-ext3_9_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
partman-basicfilesystems_11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_11.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_11.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_11_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Debian Installer wrote:
> partman-auto_5_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
I have bumped this up to standard because without partman-auto, d-i
loses some important capabilities. Please update the override file.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital
partman-auto_5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_5.dsc
partman-auto_5.tar.gz
partman-auto_5_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 07:37:52PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Given everything that parted offers, I am willing to take the risk, make
> it default now, work on it furiously, and revisit this in 1.5 weeks. If
> we made the wrong decision, we can then backpedal to the old
> partitioner.
>
> What s
Joey Hess wrote:
> Now that I've straightened out my initrd, I've managed to create this
> partman patch. This modifies the main screen with a simpler, cleaner look
> as I described earlier, including removing the menu items for commit and
> abort. I've also made some similar changes to the active_
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> This script is recently added. Please change its number from 90 to
> 70. The same change should be done with the script aptinstall_ext3
> from partman-ext3.
That does fix it, and I'm uploading fixed packages now.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Package: partman
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i
I am not l33t enough to use the "manually enter the partitioning
scheme (for experts only)". So who is? :-)
Anton said something about hiding this.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefer
.. That is indeed the question of the weekend. We need to decide this by
the end of this weekend to have time for last minute fixes on whichever
system we choose.
I feel that we should decide this on a per-architecture basis if
necessary. I do not want to see arches like sparc have to work to
supp
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
If I manually set up a single partition occupying the whole disk, then
go into automatic partitioning, tell it partition the entire drive,
and then go back from the next screen (the list of partitioning
schemes), my manually created partition is gone, an
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
I decided to copy the contents of my usb key to /tmp using partman.
After a while, I got an error message, saying "GNU parted can not
resize this partition to this size. We're working on it!". I don't
understand, which partition, to which size, and why d
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
To set up swap space, I have to tell it to format the partition, and
then select swap as the typo. I don't think of swap space as being
formatted, so this was midly confusing. I think that the "usage method"
and "file system" items could be combined into
Package: partman
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
I picked the automatic partitioning scheme that create /, home/, /var/,
/var/mail/, /usr/local, etc. It thinks that 970 mb out of 40 gb is
enough for /var; in my experience this is a bit low due to apt cache.
Also, the 1.5 gb /var/mail partition makes
Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
I picked /, /home, and swap scheme. This gave me a primary partition
for / , a 2.1 gb logical partitoon (#5) that did not have a mount
point assigned, and partition #6 was /home. If I commit that, it
complains that partition #5 has no mount point assi
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
If I pick automatic partitioning from the main partman menu, the
second item in the menu is "Use IDE1 master - entirely/var/lib"
I don't know what that /var/lib is doing there, and it seems that more
may have been truncated by cdebconf on display.
-- S
Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
We cannot use partman as our default partitioner until it supports these
two often-requested filesystems.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'
Package: partman
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
The mount options screen is excessively long, all these defintions
should be in the select list after the option names.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (50
Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
If I tell partman to create a new partition table on a disk, the default
is bsd. I do not think the list of partitoon table types should be
displayed at all at high priority, there should be a sensible
arch-specific default (dos for i396).
Also, the
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Partman lists ext2 as "extended 2", which I think will manage to
confuse both linux newbies, and old hands who want ext2. Please just call
it by its name; putting a short definition after the name for newbies might
be nice, but "extended 2" means nothing
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
In partman, if I choose a device, the first menu item is "Cancel this
menu", which is redundant because there is a back button. The third item
is something about dumping the partition info, which might be useful for
debugging, but I did not understand. T
Package: partman
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
If I create a new partition, its settings default to "do not use", not
bootable, not mounted, no filesystem type. These are not good defaults and
mean a lot of work to get a usable setup.
What I'd like to see is partman default to making an ext3 parti
Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
When it writes the partition data, I always get this error from partman:
The kernel was unable to re-read the partition table on
/dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/disk (Device or resource busy).
That is the usb device I booted the installer from, a
Having problems installing build 20040220 of Sarge. I downloaded the DVD
image from this URL:
"http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/dvd/jigdo-area/i386/sarge-i386-1.jigdo";
using jigdo. I have no problems with the installer right up until the base
system installation. I get the red box "b
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.40_powerpc.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.22-ita
Package: partman
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i
Like the subject says, partman needs a progress bar at startup. Even one
that jumped from 0 to 100 would go a long way toward assauging people's
fears of blue screens with nothing on them.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debi
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > option - description, option - description
>
> I am not sure cdebconf can line-wrap long descriptions. (I haven't
> tried yet, this is just my expectation.)
You're right, the descriptions would need to be kept short.
> > Why couldn't I create a 5th partition then?
linux-kernel-di_0.40_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.40.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.40.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386-di_0.40_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.24-1-386-di_0.40_i386.udeb
nic-extr
Great job
I'm so excited to test the new iso :)
cya
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:12:20 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > El torito CDs have a limit of 2.88 megabytes for the boot image, and we
> > cannot fit 2.7 mb of scsi modules into that and have a useful instal
Package: partman
Version: sid_i netinst iso 20040228
Severity: normal
I tried to do a simple partitioning scheme with partman (1 root, 1
swap). After finishing the filesystem creation, it should begin
installing the base system. Instead it just hangs showing a blue screen
(the system is not
hello,
I'm Valentin Brard. I'm really interested in Linux. I've been using it
for several years now. I have tried several distributions and knoppix
helped me switching to debian (after a broken hdinstall i finally
installed debian from scratch).
Anyways, I would like to help develop linux and
hi,
I wanted to know if bug 229989 was corrected
Because i re-downloaded an iso of sarge (with jigdo) this monday and the debootstrap
error still happen
is there a way to install sarge without this debootstrap error ?
thanks
Arthur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:32:29PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Granted, debconf (not cdebconf) has a couple of oddball frontends that
> do not support backing up, but it has the CAPB command not return backup
> if one of those frontends is being used.
OK.
> I'd run undo, and then continue, I sup
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:08:03PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > With "make TYPE= demo" I am unable to reproduce the bugs with the
> > missing swap, forced ext3 and the strange /var/lib. I suppose that
> > they all have one common reason related to cdebconf.
>
> Does partman ask the filesyst
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 01:55:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Mmm, how long is this delay ?
It depends. I don't expect it to be more than 30 sec in the worst
case. If the delay you observed is longer then maybe you discovered
some bug? If this happens again, please send me the output of the
Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hmm. Looking into the file I see all the languages, but this list is
> not usable in some cases, like the mentioned zh_TW, in which I can
> only tell it's Chinese, but not which "flavour" it is. Should I just
> write something like "Chinese (TW)
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If this command works, then it should accept the mirror:
>
> wget http://your-mirror/debian/dists/unstable/Release -O - | grep ^Suite: | cut -d'
> ' -f 2
Result is "unstable". But 2004-02-23 boot floppies still give:
The specified Debian archive mirro
> I'd like to install on a new box that has only an SATA drive (VIA
> chipset). I understand that the VIA chipset is supported in the 2.6
> kernel but it isn't in the 2.4 kernel.
i did an install onto an SATA-only machine this past week. one of the
images of the "beta" debian installer worked (b
Thanks to the work of others:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2003/debian-boot-200301/msg00115.html
http://www.midhgard.it/docs/index_en.html
I have a Debian system running with root on LVM on RAID. Kernel
updates, however, require either a manual update of an initrd file, or a
custom kernel
Package: installation reports
Debian-installer-version: file
from:http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: 2.4.24-i386
Date of install:26-02-2004
Method: from CD-RW obtained from file iso (sarge-i386-netinst.iso) daily
version 24-02-2004
Machine: Laptop Acer Extensa 501T
Processor:
On i386, the 2.4.25 kernel should enter the archive today or tomorrow as
udebs (crosses fingers), and all the images build ok using that kernel,
and I am in the process of testing them. It's a small upgrade, so I
expect that there will not be problems. So I plan to switch i386 over to
this kernel o
Joey Hess wrote:
> El torito CDs have a limit of 2.88 megabytes for the boot image, and we
> cannot fit 2.7 mb of scsi modules into that and have a useful installer.
>
> I guess it's time to split off a separate larger initrd for isolinux
> cds.
Done; the cdrom/initrd.gz is now a 2.5 mb initrd wi
VETSEL Patrice wrote:
> I'v an advansys scsi card, i'm trying the last sarge cd netinstall iso (27/02/2004).
> here -> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/current/
>
> My advansys scsi card is well detected but the module is not loaded... cause there
> is NO module for advansys.
>
Package: partman
Severity: minor
The functions human2longint and longint2human are not suitable for
using the correct base-2 numbers: GiB, MiB, KiB and so on. So partman
does neither output these numbers, nor does it permit them as correct
input.
-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('500
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 01:50:08PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the next upload of "console-data" I am including a French
> Atari keymap.
> This means one more entry that requires translation.
>
> Can translators please provide a translation for
>
> "French (Atari)"
> fo
I'v an advansys scsi card, i'm trying the last sarge cd netinstall iso (27/02/2004).
here -> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/current/
My advansys scsi card is well detected but the module is not loaded... cause there is
NO module for advansys.
Just modules for aic7xxx / buslo
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 05:44:20PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > instead of "zh_TW". BTW, does anyone have any idea where such a
> > list of languages could be kept? This looks like iso-codes of the
> > like, but I have doubts, whether such an out-sourcing should be
> > done, because the
> No
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> "Abort" does the same as the button -- partman exits
> immediately with error code. It is necessary for frontends without
> back-capability.
There are such frontends? Shouldn't that be fixed instead of working
around it in says that are nonintuitive in properly working fr
Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Speaking of which, I updated the script once more to ensure that
> traditional chinese gets a normal "traditional chinese" line instead
> of "zh_TW". BTW, does anyone have any idea where such a list of
> languages could be kept? This looks like i
Quoting Noel Nachtegael (N Consulting) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>my name is Noël I am from Belgium
>
>I am available for french translations for the installer
Thanks for the offer. We will find work for you. Probably not in the
Debian Installer because the french team currently handles it we
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 235124 +pending
Bug#235124: palo-installer: Update Danish debconf translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> How you did this? So far all tests of partman-ext3 and partman-auto I
> have done were using "make TYPE= demo".
I build a hd-media initrd that directly included partman, partman-ext3,
partman-auto, partman-partitioning, partman-target,
partman-basicmethods, e2fsprogs-u
I'd like to install on a new box that has only an SATA drive (VIA
chipset). I understand that the VIA chipset is supported in the 2.6
kernel but it isn't in the 2.4 kernel.
I could dig up an IDE drive and install to it, compile a kernel, and
copy things over. But I'd like to try getting d-i to wor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 09:00, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Have you seen Bug #234291?
>
> I've got a package at http://deb.p12n.org/ but still need to work out
> the license issue I mentioned in that bug, and a few other matters of
> polishing, before trying to get the package into Debian.
>
> Would y
Package: discover-data
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-28
Severity: normal
Should use tulip instead of de4x5 as de4x5 does not support mii
ltsp205:~# lspci -n -s 00:0b.0
00:0b.0 Class 0200: 1011:0019 (rev 41)
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bender 2.4.18
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:51:34PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Thanks for your review. I agree with everything I don't comment.
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:35:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> > * It really does need a progress bar at startup. It does seem that fair
> > bit of the delay
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:35:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> This is my little review of partman. I looked at it in depth and tried
> everything. Please consider this constructive criticism, I think partman
> is a fine tool overall.
>
> * It really does need a progress bar at startup. It does seem
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 05:23:48PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> I guess I didn't install those right. I've manged to get them to work,
How you did this? So far all tests of partman-ext3 and partman-auto I
have done were using "make TYPE= demo".
With "make TYPE= demo" I am unable to repro
Thanks for your review. I agree with everything I don't comment.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:35:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> * It really does need a progress bar at startup. It does seem that fair
> bit of the delay is disk-bound and not cpu-bound.
Yes, it is mostly disk-bound and includes
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 04:03:38PM -0800, Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> --- Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just for the record I'm not using floppies on this
> laptop (Did I mentionned it was a laptop ?).
>
> Also when using beta2 it works better. The first
> hardware detection fails
Package: boot-floppy
Version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso
In my dorm we must used a web-based login to access the internet. It's
kind of silly but we need a web browser to login to the internet. A
solution would be if you included the Links web browser on the boot CD.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 08:17:24AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> While commiting the slovenian translations to aboot-installer, I saw
> that this package changelog file was still messy.
>
> Hence I decided to switch to changelogs-changes use for it.
Hey, that's good news :) How does it feel?
Am Aoine, 2004-02-27 ag 06:52, scrÃobh Denis Barbier:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason why base-config depends on console-tools instead
> of "console-tools | console-utilities"?
Should work, but I'm not sure of the advantage: base-config almost
always just gets run at installation, so console-tools
hi,
my name is Noël I am
from Belgium
I am available for french translations for the
installer
Rejected: ddetect_0.69_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Accepted directory.
Rejected: hw-detect-full_0.69_all.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: archdetect_0.69_i386.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: ethdetect_0.69_al
On 27.II.2004 at 15:58 Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: partman
> Severity: normal
>
> I told partman to set up hda1 as the root partition. Then I picked free
> space, and let it autopartion that, using the /, /home layout. But now
> in partman I have two partitions mounted as root, the one I did
> man
ddetect_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.69.dsc
ddetect_0.69.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.69_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.69_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.69_all.udeb
archdetect_0.69_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Accepted:
archdetect_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.69_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.69.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.69.dsc
ddetect_0.69.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.69.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.69_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.69_all.udeb
hw-detect-full
ddetect_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.69.dsc
ddetect_0.69.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.69_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.69_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.69_all.udeb
archdetect_0.69_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
ddetect_0.69.dsc doesn't exist
Due to the errors above, the .changes file couldn't be processed.
Please fix the problems for the upload to happen.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Have you seen Bug #234291?
I've got a package at http://deb.p12n.org/ but still need to work out
the license issue I mentioned in that bug, and a few other matters of
polishing, before trying to get the package into Debian.
Would you like to either steal or sponsor this work? I'm not a debian
d
84 matches
Mail list logo
