Bug#378959: debian-installer: needs option to bypass network config dialog

2006-07-20 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 06:23:41PM -0400, zero79 wrote: so the problem is that the d-i network config dialog forces the user to select at least one of the network adapters to continue (cancel just brings up the same dialog). to bypass network config, i have to select one of the network

Bug#378971: package: installation-reports

2006-07-20 Thread Mark Pictor
Package: installation-reports Original message at bottom, for reference. This is a followup to an erroneus installation-report I made regarding the netinst cd for etch (installer beta2). -- Update: the problem was that no partition was set as boot partition.

Boot problem after flasing, led is not green.

2006-07-20 Thread Jean-Pierre Broeders
Hello, I have a problem after i flashed for the last time using this manual: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/nslu2/ After is flashed debian-sda1.bin, I shutdown the power and connect my usb harddisk. When I power my nslu2 the only green led (also after some couple of hours) i see is the transfer

linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-r5k-cobalt-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb to

linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4_mips.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.4_mips.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1-bcm91250a-di_0.4_mips.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-sb1a-bcm91480b-di_0.4_mips.udeb to

Processing of linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4_mipsel.changes

2006-07-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4.dsc linux-kernel-di-mipsel-2.6_0.4.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.16-2-r3k-kn02-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb ipv6-modules-2.6.16-2-r3k-kn02-di_0.4_mipsel.udeb

Processing of linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4_mips.changes

2006-07-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4.dsc linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6_0.4.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.16-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.4_mips.udeb ppp-modules-2.6.16-2-r4k-ip22-di_0.4_mips.udeb

Processed: Retitle: Bug#378954

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Retitle 378954 d-i: base-install fails on Pismo Powerbook Bug#378954: Installation Report Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#378404: installation guide: one more additional proposal

2006-07-20 Thread Geert Stappers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:23:13PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: --- partman-crypto.xml2006-07-09 21:21:07.0 +0200 +++ partman-crypto.xml.workingcopy2006-07-18 -First, let's have a look at available options available when you

Bug#378971: package: installation-reports

2006-07-20 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 20/07/06, Mark Pictor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something else: extended partitions aren't supposed to be bootable, are they? Yet sda7 was set to boot, and it is extended, not primary. sounds like a bug to me... You are confusing logical partitions with extended partitions. The later type

Bug#378954: Pismo can't install Xorg

2006-07-20 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:05:45PM -0700, brian wrote: Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: July 18 download netinstall.iso at debian.org daily builds etch (time approx 4pm pdt) Date: July 18 -19 evening/ overnight pdt Machine: powerpc, powerbook3,1

Bug#373567: finish-install fails also with busybox v. 1.1.3-2

2006-07-20 Thread Patrick Winnertz
Frans Pop wrote : I seriously doubt you are using the busybox-udeb with that version when building the installer's initrd. Check your /var/lib/dpkg/status file. The -k option _is_ supported in busybox-udeb 1.1.3-2. Yes, sorry, i checked it yesterday evening. Our initrd image was build with the

Processing of linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1_arm.changes

2006-07-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1.dsc linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb nic-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb

linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1_arm.changes is NEW

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Installer
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb

Bug#378984: fstab default /proc entry nosuid

2006-07-20 Thread maximilian attems
Package: partman-target Version: 44 Severity: normal Tags: patch please apply belows patch, to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid. rationale: setuid and setgid bits have nothing lost in /proc, nice workaround for kernel /proc vulnerability, see suggested at the lwn.net article:

Bug#378984: fstab default /proc entry nosuid

2006-07-20 Thread Thiemo Seufer
maximilian attems wrote: Package: partman-target Version: 44 Severity: normal Tags: patch please apply belows patch, to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid. rationale: setuid and setgid bits have nothing lost in /proc, nice workaround for kernel /proc vulnerability, see suggested

Re: Bug#378404: installation guide: one more additional proposal

2006-07-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 20 July 2006 11:37, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:23:13PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: --- partman-crypto.xml 2006-07-09 21:21:07.0 +0200 +++ partman-crypto.xml.workingcopy 2006-07-18 -First, let's have a look at available options available

Bug#378971: marked as done (package: installation-reports)

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:03:14 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#378971: package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#378984: fstab default /proc entry nosuid

2006-07-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 20 July 2006 13:23, maximilian attems wrote: please apply belows patch, to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid. There was a short discussion about this on IRC. fjp Kamion: What do you think of #378984? Kamion fjp: suspicious of noexec, aren't there symlinks to executables in

Bug#292966: installation-reports: No /etc/network/interfaces using etch beta 2 installer

2006-07-20 Thread Tiago Saboga
Em Sábado 17 Junho 2006 16:52, você escreveu: Tiago Saboga wrote: The system does not have a /etc/network/interfaces file, and though no loopback device activated. Nothing wrong happened during install, and I only noticed it two weeks later when configuring pppoe. I take it that you don't

Bug#379021: tasksel: New language tasks show up during new installation

2006-07-20 Thread Frans Pop
Package: tasksel Version: 0.9.7.1 Severity: important During a new installation the following language tasks are shown for selection by the user: Finnish, Galician, Icelandic, Irish, Macedonian, Portuguese, Slovenian, Welsh. Please upload a fixed version with increased severity as this should

Bug#292966: marked as done (installation: Does not create /etc/network/interfaces)

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:19:08 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#292966: installation-reports: No /etc/network/interfaces using etch beta 2 installer has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6_1.1_arm.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb crc-modules-2.6.16-2-footbridge-di_1.1_arm.udeb to

Bug#379052: localechooser: Please do no more create /etc/environment

2006-07-20 Thread Denis Barbier
Package: localechooser Severity: normal Hi, when locale variables had been moved from /etc/environment into /etc/default/locale, Christian and I agreed on letting localechooser create both files until most programs have been modified in testing. I believe that this is done now, so localechooser

Bug#379057: Please allow to deselect the modules that get loaded by default

2006-07-20 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Hi, Debian-installer keeps growing, which makes installing on low-ram machines harder as time goes by. Sometimes such growth is necessary; in other cases, the memory footprint grows to add features which admittedly are nice, but aren't required for

What is the difference between these two sets of CD images?

2006-07-20 Thread Rick Thomas
I'm curious... On the cdimage.d.o server there seem to be two parallel series of daily-build debian-installer cd images. They are clearly different, but why? Enjoy! Rick == Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd Name

Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in install of powerpc

2006-07-20 Thread Rick Thomas
Package: installation-reports Boot method: How did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network? booted from daily businesscard CD Image version: Full URL to image you downloaded is best | Index of /cdimage/daily-builds/etch_d-i/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd | Name

Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in install of powerpc

2006-07-20 Thread Rick Thomas
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [o] Detect network card:[o] Configure network: [o] Detect CD: [o] Load installer modules: [o]

Processed: Re: Bug#379074: Installation Fail- Please help!

2006-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 379074 installation-reports Bug#379074: Installation Fail- Please help! Warning: Unknown package 'method' Warning: Unknown package 'floppyimage' Warning: Unknown package 'version' Warning: Unknown package 'debian' Warning: Unknown package 'gnu'

Bug#379067: couple of minor glitches in install of powerpc

2006-07-20 Thread Rick Thomas
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: 2) However, strangely, the lspci command seems to be missing from the installed system. I *was* able to get it (as part of the pciutils package) from the mirror via aptitude. So it's not missing completely. Interestingly... I had