Hi, thank you very much for removing most of the information on the
link I sent you earlier. However, there is one more I found. Would you
mind removing that one too? thanks. http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2008/03/msg00722.html
Se n?o visualizar correctamente esta mensagem por favor v? a:
http://www.e-mail4business.com/newsletters/20080914/clinicadopc/clinicadopcweb.html
Se desejar receber mais informa??es, por favor v? a:
http://www.clinicadopc.eu/component/option,com_contact/task,view/contact_id,1/Itemid,3/
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> First of all: can this not just be done in a similar way to what's
> already been done for multipath in lines 103 and 109? If not, why?
Hmm. I can probably answer that myself: because the devmapper device names
are not fixed but depend on the name
On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> attached debdiff fixes the root detection, can you review it please?
I have cloned the BR to grub-installer. Please do so yourself next time,
preferably _before_ sending patches. Doing so prevents adding a load of
basically unrelated info to
Accepted:
partman-palo_12.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12.dsc
partman-palo_12.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12.tar.gz
partman-palo_12_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-palo/partman-palo_12_hppa.udeb
Override entries for your package:
partman-palo_12.dsc - s
Accepted:
palo-installer_0.0.12.dsc
to pool/main/p/palo-installer/palo-installer_0.0.12.dsc
palo-installer_0.0.12.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/palo-installer/palo-installer_0.0.12.tar.gz
palo-installer_0.0.12_hppa.udeb
to pool/main/p/palo-installer/palo-installer_0.0.12_hppa.udeb
Override entries
reassign 433579 debian-installer
thanks
Reassigning to debian-installer as partman-dmraid is soon to be removed
from the archive and this issue affects various components (at least
hw-detect, partman, grub-installer, os-prober).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 433579 debian-installer
Bug#433579: partman-dmraid: Error in logic determining if dmraid is supported
Bug reassigned from package `partman-dmraid' to `debian-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Lowering severity as the dmraid support is fixed in daily images
> severity 497110 normal
Bug#497110: boot loader installation failed when dmraid=true
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> clone 497110 -1
Bug#497110: boot loader installation fail
On Monday 22 September 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Frans Pop ha scritto:
> > On Saturday 13 September 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> >> Pleas include dmraid=true in Special boot parameters for the install
> >> system (F8)
> >
> > Let's at least wait until we have dmraid working again...
>
>
When drive #2 - the "CDROM mounted in a cheapo external
USB enclosure" mentioned in the original report - is used on the machine
profiled in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498834 the same
thing happens: the Etch installer runs fine, the Lenny installer has much
trouble.
I don
partman-palo_12_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-palo_12.dsc
partman-palo_12.tar.gz
partman-palo_12_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
palo-installer_0.0.12_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
palo-installer_0.0.12.dsc
palo-installer_0.0.12.tar.gz
palo-installer_0.0.12_hppa.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Monday 22 September 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Following packages need to be upload by porters (those are translation
> only updates or trivial changes):
>
> arch/hppa/palo-installer
> partman/partman-palo
Done.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
- From time I clean up my packages and today I removed libdiscover1 since
it is a mere transitional package. Now nothing depends on the package
discover anymore and thus apt-get suggests to autoremove discover,
discover-data and libdiscover2.
I’v
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:11:39 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#56: installation-reports: installation report
netinst 23.09.2008: Acer TravelMate 661LMi
has caused the Debian Bug report #56,
regarding installation-reports: installation repor
Hi.
>From time I clean up my packages and today I removed libdiscover1 since
it is a mere transitional package. Now nothing depends on the package
discover anymore and thus apt-get suggests to autoremove discover,
discover-data and libdiscover2.
I’ve read the description of these packages but I a
Quoting Julien Cristau ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > - i18n of the keymap questions (keymap names), which would be a
> > regression
>
> Would the existing translations from xkeyboard-config be useful there,
> or would we need to start all over? Granted, that's probably not as
> widely translated as d
FYI: The status of the cobalt-scripts source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.02
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint f
Hello,
Julien Cristau, le Wed 24 Sep 2008 12:29:07 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 18:03:16 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > - having someone really caring about this *and* being skilled enough
> > in those things to be able to commit self to conduct the transition
> > *and* maintai
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20080522
Severity: important
Hi,
I installed the 4.0 release with the netinstall image. After the
installation, I needed of pppoeconf for download of others packages in
the internet and this is missing.
So, I would like to see pppoeconf on default image.
Thanks
also sprach Matthias Köhne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.23.2051 +0200]:
> Is it necessary to resync the new raid _at_ the installation? It
> took more than 12 hours to check my software-raid.
>
> Sep 20 20:41:43 mdcfg: mdadm: array /dev/md2 started.
> Sep 21 08:54:00 kernel: [50499.929621] md: md2
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 18:03:16 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> There were plans to *use* console-setup in D-I instead of kbd-chooser
> and console-data udebs. They would have resulted in c-s being used on
> the installed system as well.
>
> There is even a wiki pakge in the DebianInstaller
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-i386-netinst
Date: Tue Sep 23 01:47:56 UTC 2008
Machine: Acer TravelMate 661LMi
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:32:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#499969: installation-reports: Successfull install
has caused the Debian Bug report #499969,
regarding installation-reports: Successfull install
to be marked as done.
This means that you
25 matches
Mail list logo
