This patch adds ufs initrd support.
It was in the previous d-i kfreebsd branch, so thanks to Robert Millan.
This code has the bad thing that mkfs.ufs must be executed as root,
and I don't know how to create a ufs filesystem on kfreebsd without
being root.
Comments on how to create a ufs filesystem
This patch solves a poll() portability issue on kfreebsd-i386, and
shouldn't affect other archs.
I tested this on kfreebsd-i386, solving an infinite loop.
Cheers,
Luca Favatella
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog (.../
A *second version* of test D-I images with console-setup replacing
kbdchooser has been built.
It includes several recent fixes and evolutions for console-setup
udebbased on the invaluable contributions by testers, particularly
Frans Pop.
I would appreciate if these images could be tested, par
On 06/07/2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 06 July 2009, Luca Favatella wrote:
>> This patch substitutes Linux-specific code in get_all_ifs() using
>> getifaddrs().
>
> -if (!strcmp(ibuf, "lo"))/* ignore the loopback */
> [...]
> +if (!strncmp(ibuf, "lo", 2))/* ign
With our current schedulen, the next team meeting will happend on July
20th.
However, This day of the week is not convenient for Colin Watson, our
technical leader.
Would people object to us moving the meeting day to Tuesdays, Wednesdays
or Thursdays (same hour, that is 20:00 UTC)?
--
signa
The bi-monthly D-I team meeting happened today at 20:00UTC.
As usual, the logs are available from
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Monday 06 July 2009, Luca Favatella wrote:
> This patch substitutes Linux-specific code in get_all_ifs() using
> getifaddrs().
-if (!strcmp(ibuf, "lo"))/* ignore the loopback */
[...]
+if (!strncmp(ibuf, "lo", 2))/* ignore the loopback */
Please do not include r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 535709 "Missing dependency on package sharutils"
Bug#535709: console-setup: Missing dependency on uudecode
Changed Bug title to `"Missing dependency on package sharutils"' from
`console-setup: Missing dependency on uudecode'.
(By the way,
This patch substitutes Linux-specific code in get_all_ifs() using getifaddrs().
I tested this patch on (linux-)i386 trunk monolithic.
It builds and seems to work without regressions.
I only tested on default qemu, and the network seems to behave as
usual (I didn't complete the installation, but i
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:40:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> fontconfig has been waiting 21 days for migration, perhaps it should be
> unblocked? No RC bugs were filed during that time.
debian-boot, please approve, this is blocked due to a udeb.
Best regards,
--
Jurij Smakov
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 03:55:22PM +0100, Allan Fearon wrote:
> after doing clean install of Debian 5.02 desktop found that
> network-manager and update-manager no longer included by default. is
> there a reason for this.
Rerouting to debian-boot, where this discussion is more appropriate,
deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 463632 help
Bug#463632: console-setup: init.d scripts reported as obsolete by dpkg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
> block 514464 by 535997
Bug#535997: Can not assign arbitrary modifiers to the keyboard leds
Bug#514464: caps lock le
(Switching to m-l only as this does not really have anything to do with
the BR.)
On Monday 06 July 2009, you wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > I don't think policy for Recommends is wrong, but I do feel it
> > results to a hell of a lot of packages getting installed that are not
> > actually needed/w
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:29:01 +0300
with message-id <20090706182901.gd17...@debian.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#532842: console-setup: [INTL:de] updated German
debconf translation
has caused the Debian Bug report #532842,
regarding console-setup: [INTL:de] updated German debconf tr
tag 535494 pending
thanks
On Thursday 02 July 2009, Jesse W wrote:
> the line
> # dkpg-reconfigure tzdata
> should be
> # dpkg-reconfigure tzdata
Fixed. Thanks for spotting the typo.
Cheers,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 535494 pending
Bug#535494: Typo: # dkpg-reconfigure tzdata
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Frans Pop wrote:
> I don't think policy for Recommends is wrong, but I do feel it results to
> a hell of a lot of packages getting installed that are not actually
> needed/wanted in practice.
We have a whole release cycle to sort this out now.
> IMO the special handling of Recommends in D-I
>
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> OK. I think we need to make a new round of checks to see whether there
> are some other things that are installed now and whether it is wise to
> consider them. I can start with a list of things in meta-gnome2, but
> there are also some indirect recommends.
>
> * gn
The following is from the responce of the submitter.
- Forwarded message from Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
-
Hi,
Le mercredi 03 juin 2009 à 17:01 +0300, Anton Zinoviev a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 02:27:39PM +0200, Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote:
> >
> > Yes the bug still exists, even on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After trying out some more configurations I think this issue is more
general than only related to encrypted fs.
Actual I've following partitions:
Disk /dev/hdb: 32.0 GB, 32078036992 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3899 cylinders
Units = cylinders o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 480899
Bug#480899: incomplete split prevents installation of cdebconf-gtk
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> found 480899 0.143
Bug#480899: incomplete split prevents installation of cdebconf-gtk
Bug marked as found in version 0.143.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 480899
Bug#480899: cdebconf: Needs a package split for gtk frontend to allow
installation without X
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened
reopen 480899
retitle 480899 incomplete split prevents installation of cdebconf-gtk
severity serious
thanks
> cdebconf needs a package split (or possibly more than one) so that the
> gtk+ frontend is optional, along with it's dependencies.
The package split has happened but the default package st
clone 535908 -1 -2
retitle -1 [Debconf] It is not clear what is the meaning of "configuration
program"
retitle -2 Complains about "unsupported option" on every upgrade.
retitle 524235 [Debconf] The question about AltGr is confusing because 'AltGr'
can denote both a physical key on the keyboard an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 535908 -1 -2
Bug#535908: console-setup: Add support for newer Xorg option
Bug 535908 cloned as bugs 535965-535966.
> retitle -1 [Debconf] It is not clear what is the meaning of "configuration
> program"
Bug#535965: console-setup: Add suppo
On Monday 06 July 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
> So does that mean you feel that the policy manual's description of
> Recommends is wrong, or that Debian installations should be unusual by
> default?
I don't think policy for Recommends is wrong, but I do feel it results to
a hell of a lot of package
Hi all,
fontconfig has been waiting 21 days for migration, perhaps it should be
unblocked? No RC bugs were filed during that time.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 05 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I must say that I'm not at all sure that the change to include
> > Recommends wasn't done prematurely or too lightly. It is quite likely
> > to also affect the server tasks in quite a big way a
Christian Perrier, le Mon 06 Jul 2009 07:15:45 +0200, a écrit :
> > Why not? Even if we're not able to provide messages in the native
> > language of the user, it's still _very_ useful for the user to be able
> > to type mails in his own language.
>
> This is not how the reasoning was made all al
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> > However, I still think we should be selective in it. For instance, I
> > don't see any purpose in having a keymap for Oriya/India while we
> > don't support Oriya in D-I.
>
> Why not? Even if we're not able to provide messages in the native
> l
* Frans Pop [2009-07-05 15:51]:
> On Sunday 05 July 2009, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> > Because I haven't tried on armel (I don't have) yet, I don't make sure
> > it works on armel as same as i386/amd64. Maybe you need to modify
> > ./build and some d-i/* files.
>
> It won't work for armel as your image
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 535931 installation-reports
Bug#535931: Can't install debian in my notebook ( networking can't reconglize )
Warning: Unknown package 'debian5.0.2_iso'
Bug reassigned from package `debian5.0.2_iso' to `installation-reports'.
> --
Stopping
32 matches
Mail list logo