Hi,
A Sexta 25 Fevereiro 2011 01:00:03 Daily build aggregator você escreveu:
[...]
* FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 25 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_generic
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log
* FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 25 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_tape
Hi,
we're considering switching util-linux from slang to ncurses as per
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581631 . Do you have
any input on that, apart from the obvious one that is that we need to
have an ncurses-udeb before making the change?
Please keep me in Cc, I'm not
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 00:20, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Anton Zinoviev, le Thu 24 Feb 2011 07:28:18 +0200, a écrit :
True. Other people have complained about this too. Unfortunately I
don't know a reliable way to test whether we are on the console or in X
and it is
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
if pidof X /dev/null; then
echo X is running
else
echo X isn't running
fi
Errr, surely not :)
What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not.
And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (since you
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 13:05, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
if pidof X /dev/null; then
echo X is running
else
echo X isn't running
fi
Errr, surely not :)
heh.
What Anton wants is to know whether X is
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
we're considering switching util-linux from slang to ncurses as per
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581631 . Do you have
any input on that, apart from the obvious one that is that we need to
have an ncurses-udeb
25.02.2011 16:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
we're considering switching util-linux from slang to ncurses as per
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581631 . Do you have
any input on that, apart from the obvious one that
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:40:41PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
25.02.2011 16:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
we're considering switching util-linux from slang to ncurses as per
25.02.2011 16:53, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:40:41PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
25.02.2011 16:18, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:16:31PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
we're considering switching util-linux from slang to ncurses as per
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:56:42PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
25.02.2011 16:53, Bastian Blank wrote:
In the long term, we may just drop it.
Is it used now?
So what?
So that's a valid point, thanks!
It is only used on some mips for some weird disklabel format. Everything
else uses
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Hi,
During the lenny-squeeze upgrade I noticed that right after the first
reboot (item 4.4.5 in the squeeze release notes) my logical volumes were not
found any more.
I have the LVM set up on IDE disks. Before the reboot the PV's were on
* Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org [110225 15:10]:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:56:42PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
25.02.2011 16:53, Bastian Blank wrote:
In the long term, we may just drop it.
Is it used now?
So what?
So that's a valid point, thanks!
It is only used on some mips for
25.02.2011 18:27, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org [110225 15:10]:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:56:42PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
25.02.2011 16:53, Bastian Blank wrote:
In the long term, we may just drop it.
Is it used now?
So what?
So that's a valid point, thanks!
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:05:07PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently at the front or not.
And you can't rely on DISPLAY being set (since you could be from sudo su
-), and you can't rely on stdin being the VT (since you could be from
screen).
Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de writes:
During the lenny-squeeze upgrade I noticed that right after the first
reboot (item 4.4.5 in the squeeze release notes) my logical volumes were not
found any more.
I have the LVM set up on IDE disks. Before the reboot the PV's were on
/dev/hda11,
On 25.02.11 Ferenc Wagner (wf...@niif.hu) wrote:
Hilmar Preusse hill...@web.de writes:
Hi,
During the upgrade of lvm by calling apt-get dist-upgrade
everything has been fixed, but until then these file systems were
unavailable.
Strange, LVM should scan all available block devices for
On 02/24/2011 04:02 PM, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:48:41PM +0100, Hyrob wrote:
The problem basicly is that when pressing any of the modifier keys
they do not 'modify' the keys pressed simultaneusly with them.
Does this keyboard work on the console?
It kind of
Hi,
Anton Zinoviev an...@lml.bas.bg (25/02/2011):
Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because
they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs
not a tty. For a long time the following code worked:
case `readlink /proc/self/fd/2` in
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:00:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Anton Zinoviev an...@lml.bas.bg (25/02/2011):
Testing the standard output and standard input never worked because
they are redirected by Debconf. In particular /usr/bin/tty outputs
not a tty. For a long time the following
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which
vt's have X currently running?
Indeed!
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 07:30:53PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:23:27PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Is 'fgconsole' of any help if one could combine it with knowing which
vt's have X currently running?
Indeed!
Probably linux only though.
--
Len Sorensen
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 14:05:07 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 13:01:59 +, a écrit :
if pidof X /dev/null; then
echo X is running
else
echo X isn't running
fi
Errr, surely not :)
What Anton wants is to know whether X is currently
reassign 614936 linux-latest-2.6
retitle 614936 Modifier keys (ctrl, shift, alt) not working - Bluetooth keyboard
thanks
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 05:53:59PM +0100, Jacek Leśniewski wrote:
I had no problem getting to the ttys, however I do not understand why it
would be necessary to run the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 614936 linux-latest-2.6
Bug #614936 [keyboard-configuration] keyboard-configuration: Modifier keys
(ctrl, shift, alt) not working - Bluetooth keyboard
Bug reassigned from package 'keyboard-configuration' to 'linux-latest-2.6'.
Bug No
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why at best? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
How can this be tested?
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 20:20:47 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 06:44:22PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Why at best? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
How can this be tested?
Something like this:
#include
A Segunda 21 Fevereiro 2011 21:09:00 Harald Geyer você escreveu:
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: official squeeze netboot.tar.gz
Date: Mon Feb 21 20:47:22 CET 2011
Machine: Compaq Deskpro EN
tag 613910 + patch
thanks
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 08:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks very much for including my rather last minute apt-setup patch to
add $codename-updates to sources.list when volatile is selected for =
squeeze installs.
Unfortunately, the behaviour is somewhat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 613910 + patch
Bug #613910 [apt-setup] apt-setup: Improve squeeze-updates behaviour during
installations with no network mirror
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
613910:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
Why at best? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using the
Julien Cristau, le Sat 26 Feb 2011 01:18:27 +0100, a écrit :
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:15:33 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
Why at best? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed
Julien Cristau, le Fri 25 Feb 2011 18:44:22 +0100, a écrit :
Why at best? It sounds like checking whether the active VT is in
KD_TEXT is exactly what's needed here.
No, because that may just be an fbterm, still using the normal keyboard
processing, and not Xorg.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log
* OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot
33 matches
Mail list logo
