Re: Automatically created root partition seems to be quite small

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:26:49PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Please make a proper installation report including the log from your install. There's just no way to fix anything with the info you provided. Done: #693107. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To

Bug#693130: instalation-reports: fail of detect network hardware

Package: installation-reports Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome of this action?

Bug#680084: nmu

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 00:30:06 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 16:57:30 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/7. The extra time is to give you a chance to do a maintainer upload instead. Please see attached patch.

Bug#693141: installation-report: XFCE-variant of Squeeze installed on FSC-Futro-S300 w/ backports

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Version: 2.44 Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** - -- Package-specific info: Boot method: USB Image version:

Bug#693141: cpufreqd.conf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 see attachment -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCiYr4ACgkQ5+rBHyUt5wtA/QCfQwDJrvB9vlddCkV5O8YVZBM9 K7cAoI9tne2NVeVmefapirlqAxWk/nT0 =advI -END PGP SIGNATURE- cpufreqd.conf.gz Description: GNU

Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 693141 installation-report: LXDE-variant of Squeeze installed on FSC-Futro-S300 Bug #693141 [installation-reports] installation-report: XFCE-variant of Squeeze installed on FSC-Futro-S300 w/ backports Changed Bug title to

Unblocks for d-i beta4

Hi folks, please unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent the following packages: netcfg/1.101 rootskel/1.101 yaboot-installer/1.1.25 grub-installer/1.83 Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Unblocks for d-i beta4

On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 21:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: please unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent the following packages: netcfg/1.101 rootskel/1.101 yaboot-installer/1.1.25 grub-installer/1.83 All done. netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be adding

Re: Unblocks for d-i beta4

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (13/11/2012): All done. Ta. netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be adding versatile support and a bunch of .gitignore noise; I'm assuming that also wants pulling in? Yes, please. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc

Re: Unblocks for d-i beta4

On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 22:35 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (13/11/2012): netcfg also needs libdebian-installer. The changes there appear to be adding versatile support and a bunch of .gitignore noise; I'm assuming that also wants pulling in? Yes,

Re: Booth at FSCONS 2012

Please confirm that everything is now OK :-) I found a few other issues: * In order to not blank the screen when installing I added kernel parameter diff --git a/babelbox-grub b/babelbox-grub index fc30411..f7e09ee 100644 --- a/babelbox-grub +++ b/babelbox-grub @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ menuentry

Can the partman udeb be excluded?

I have to create a debian installer CD that is for a specific hardware. I've chosen to use the LiveCD system and create a live CD that includes the debian-installer package. (I use a Live system because I must do some user interaction before launching the installer) I preseed everything,

Re: Booth at FSCONS 2012

On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 23:05 +0100, Per Andersson wrote: Please confirm that everything is now OK :-) I found a few other issues: * In order to not blank the screen when installing I added kernel parameter diff --git a/babelbox-grub b/babelbox-grub index fc30411..f7e09ee 100644