Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 22:20:49 -0400
with message-id <57217381.2030...@ubuntu.com>
and subject line partman-partitioning: Partitions are not aligned
has caused the Debian Bug report #762694,
regarding partman-partitioning: Partitions are not aligned
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:41:24 -0400
with message-id <57214014.4070...@ubuntu.com>
and subject line installation-reports: installer doesn't recognize full disk
size under Hyper-V ( windows 2008 r2), 128GiB max
has caused the Debian Bug report #604150,
regarding installation-reports:
grub-installer fails to get the right default boot device when I install
from mini.iso.
Are the checks at grub-installer lines 613:615 correct?
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/grub-installer.git/tree/grub-installer#n613
When I install from mini.iso [1] /dev/sda is my USB stick and /dev/sdb
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:13:25PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On 23 April 2016 at 02:57, Christian PERRIER wrote:
[ ... ]
> > So, new energy and contributions are much welcomed. I kinda witnessed
> > your work on btrfs from far away and I thinnk the best to do
On 2016-04-24 09:18, Geert Stappers wrote:
| Install a starting point.
| More complicated configuration can be done on the installed system.
| KISS
Keep It Simple
There is also the inverse direction here: The user will be confused as
to why so much of the drive's capacity is missing and
On 2016-04-23 23:51, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Ubuntu avoids using the default subvolume (subvol ID 5). For the
rootfs their installer creates a subvol called @, for /home it creates
@home, etc. In fstab the device is specified and subvol=@ is added to
the mount option to specify which
6 matches
Mail list logo