Bug#816892: why is sync needed?
I wonder why the sync was needed. I cannot find any info in the git logs. It seems to be there for a long time. IMO this should be removed, if noone can argue why it is needed. -- regards Thomas
Bug#871835: speed up for debootstrap
Hi Thomas, Thomas Lange(2017-08-12): > Package: debootstrap > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > I've wrote some patches, which speed up deboostrap a lot. > Changes are only made to /usr/share/debootstrap/functions, mostly in > the perl part, but also the number of lines that are proceeded by > perl are reduced via egrep. > > Here are some time measures on a 4-core machine, the target directory > is inside a tmpfs and a local mirror in the same subnet is used. > > old version 1.0.89 > real1m26.940s > user1m24.180s > sys 0m2.420s > > > including the patches > real0m39.481s > user0m50.444s > sys 0m2.748s > > > If you have any questions concerning the patches, just ask me. I'm very excited about those patches, feel free to catch me during the evening for a little talk about those. KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#870869: Segfault during libc-l10n install on kirkwood (armel)
On 2017-08-12 22:40, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking abou the flash-debian script > (the script you run on the QNAP firmware to run the installer). But > you're talking about kirkwood-qnap, the script in flash-kernel. What > error did you get? Which verison of Debian did you run it on? Yes. I started a debian "reinstall" on a wheezy installation on the QNAP, by running the kirkwood-qnap to detect the kernel version. I don't recall getting an error, it just does: echo "kirkwood-qnap: Unable to determine $machine variant " >&2 exit 1 So, I figured the model in cpuinfo (Feroceon 88FR131 rev 1 (v5l)) was less important for the kernel version than /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/soc_id and lscpi output and picked kernel-6282. Then I flashed new kernel-6282 and initrd: cat $kernel > /dev/mtdblock1 cat initrd > /dev/mtdblock2 I didn't change uboot. Then I rebooted and got the stretch installer, and I tries install the system at least 10 times trying to rule out that anything I did along the way was a problem (like change DNS manually) ... but it kept segfaulting at the same point consistenly. I ran the tests on wheezy before flashing the installer for reinstall. I could probably get back to the wheezy system (somehow, maybe using TFTP). As of now I've left the system in this stretch-half-installed state if there's need for debugging. /Peter
Bug#870869: Segfault during libc-l10n install on kirkwood (armel)
* Peter Mogensen[2017-08-12 08:42]: > >> (even though the kirkwood-qnap script can't auto-detect the right > >> kernel version on a 419PII) > > > > Maybe the QNAP firmware has changed. If you can easily go back to the > > QNAP firmware, we can look into this issue. > > I have the original firmware "somewhere", but the box has been running > wheezy for 2 years and it hasn't had any upgrades from QNAP. Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking abou the flash-debian script (the script you run on the QNAP firmware to run the installer). But you're talking about kirkwood-qnap, the script in flash-kernel. What error did you get? Which verison of Debian did you run it on? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/
☑wow surprising surprise
Dear, I know you are going to be stunned by that information, just take a look http://www.ilsorriso.dreamhosters.com/sweater.php?0908 Looking forward, Samuel Thibault
Bug#871751: installation-guide: please transition from jadetex to texlive-formats-extra
Hi, On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:56:01 +0200 Samuel Thibaultwrote: > Hello, > > Holger Wansing, on ven. 11 août 2017 20:41:08 +0200, wrote: > > jadetex is only used for creating ps variants of the manual (strictly spoken > > to generate dvi file, as a intermediate step to create ps), and ps variant > > is disabled for a long time already. > > > > Should we completely remove create_ps and create_dvi and ps variant from > > the > > code? > > I'd say so. Ok, I will prepare a patch for that. Holger -- Holger Wansing
Re: Busybox in Debian
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 14:54 -0400, Chris Boot wrote: [...] > - The default initramfs assembly system, initramfs-tools, incorporates > busybox into the initramfs and it's used until the root filesystem (and > /usr if separate) is mounted and can be pivot_rooted into. We also use > parts of klibc in the initramfs, and I'm not yet entirely clear what > tools in the initramfs are klibc tools, busybox applets or executables > copied from the running system. [...] If initramfs-tools is configured to use busybox, busybox installs all its commands and then klibc-utils installs any commands that are not already there. So for any command that they both implement, the busybox implementation is used. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#870869: Segfault during libc-l10n install on kirkwood (armel)
On 2017-08-11 21:46, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> Using the kernel-6282 > > Are you sure you're using the right kernel? Not 100%. (Since I couldn't find documentation about the difference), But I read the detection script and noticed that it got the "6282" name frem lspci, and that my box had :6282 in the device-id. >> (even though the kirkwood-qnap script can't auto-detect the right >> kernel version on a 419PII) > > Maybe the QNAP firmware has changed. If you can easily go back to the > QNAP firmware, we can look into this issue. I have the original firmware "somewhere", but the box has been running wheezy for 2 years and it hasn't had any upgrades from QNAP. /Peter