Hi,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:22:28 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Here are ways you can run it:
> >
> > ./bug-731859-demo-v2.sh stretch chroot
With provided script, it runs debootstrap under chroot, however,
debootstraped environment under chroot causes problem with symlink.
$ sudo chroot
Package: fakechroot
Version: 2.19-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
fakechroot works on Stretch but not on Sid.
>henrich@stretch1:~$ fakechroot --version
>fakechroot version 2.19
>henrich@stretch1:~$ fakechroot chroot stretch true
>henrich@stretch1:~$ echo $?
>0
>henrich@sid1:~$
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:00:16 +
Source: debian-installer
Binary: debian-installer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20150422+deb8u5
Distribution: jessie
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Mapping jessie to oldstable.
Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:00:16 +
Source: debian-installer
Binary: debian-installer
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20150422+deb8u5
debian-installer_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20150422+deb8u5.dsc
debian-installer_20150422+deb8u5.tar.gz
debian-installer_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-18):
> Yes, d-i and dini are the last things I'm expecting for the point
> release; everything else has been in place for at least a couple of
> dinstalls already.
Great.
> If the d-i upload could happen before the end of tomorrow, that should
> still give us plenty of
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 20:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-18):
> > One thing I'd overlooked when scheduling binNMUs for d-i in
> > preparation for the point release is that there's been a kernel ABI
> > change (actually, two) in opu since the previous point
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-18):
> One thing I'd overlooked when scheduling binNMUs for d-i in
> preparation for the point release is that there's been a kernel ABI
> change (actually, two) in opu since the previous point release, so we
> will need a source d-i upload after all.
>
> KiBi: Is
Frank Bauer wrote:
> It's been almost a year, so I would like to ask whether we can
> expect Secure Boot support for buster? My offer to help with
> testing of this dreadful technology still stands.
Here is a fairly recent report:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/04/msg00071.html
[recipient list dropped to KiBi, -boot and -release]
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 22:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Anything June/July-ish should be good for me.
>
>
> debian-boot@, if there's anything needing a fix in jessie, please
> follow up to the list and myself.
One thing I'd overlooked when
Hi,
It's been almost a year, so I would like to ask whether we can expect
Secure Boot support for buster?
My offer to help with testing of this dreadful technology still stands.
Frank
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank Bauer (2017-07-15):
>> I would
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 08:19, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Seems like the RC bug against debootstrap which Paul mentioned should
> be opened (to be closed by some future upload of debootstrap with this
> MR merged)then. Otherwise the package can migrate before the required
> review + merge has happened.
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Holger Wansing (2018-06-08):
> > We had the same situation in 2016 with jessie/stretch manual.
> > I have already adapted the lessoften cron script in
> > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/commit/f02a61c6d43c3b2f141ad64a837c33fbd0f56fb8
> >
Hello -www and -boot
El 18/06/18 a las 00:59, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
> Hi folks,
>
> Holger Wansing (2018-06-08):
>> We had the same situation in 2016 with jessie/stretch manual.
>> I have already adapted the lessoften cron script in
>>
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.102
Severity: serious
Justification: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2018/06/msg00238.html
See the conversation around/following [1] for more context.
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2018/06/msg00175.html
The TLDR is that the previous version of
On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 08:07 -0700, Tianon Gravi wrote:
> IMO, that merge request needs some review and an upload and then this
> bug will be fixed properly in debootstrap too.
Seems like the RC bug against debootstrap which Paul mentioned should
be opened (to be closed by some future upload of
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 02:43, Paul Gevers wrote:
> It would be nice if you responded to this idea of Ansgar, as the
> regression in debuerreotype is currently delaying the migration of
> debootstrap. Is the new behavior of debootstrap really bad for
> debuerreotype or is it just resulting in a
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 12:15:51 +1000
Russell Stuart wrote:
> I didn't get that failure, but a postinst expecting /proc to be mounted
> doesn't sound unreasonable.
Hmm.
> > I'm not sure how to run nested chroot with success, it means
> > "chroot "/tmp/${suite}" /bin/sh" line would still
Hi Tianon,
On 14-06-18 10:19, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> The patch for #839046 also disabled --merged-usr for stretch as stretch
> was added to the blacklist in first_stage_install().
>
> debootstrap should default to non-merged-usr for stretch, but it should
> be possible to enable merged-usr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 901718 901717
Bug #901718 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Version 1.0.102 breaks use of file
mirrors
Bug #901717 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Version 1.0.102 breaks use of file
mirrors
Merged 901717 901718
> thank
Stopping processing here.
20 matches
Mail list logo
