Bug#731859: Happens to me on stretch

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 20:22 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > I've run it and got failure as below (my question is can we run > nested chroot without failure?) If I parse that correctly you as asking is it possible to possible to do a debootstrap inside of a chroot. The answer is yes of course, but

Re: Debian Installer Buster Alpha 3 release

Hi Sebastian, Sebastian Krause (2018-06-19): > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > * cryptsetup: > > - Upgrade to upstream version 2.0.0. > > Since this version of cryptsetup adds support for dm-integrity > (https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/wikis/DMIntegrity), are > there any plans to

Re: processes/lock on dillon regarding static sync

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > From reading #debian-release a couple of hours ago, it looks like one of > the hosts behind static hit ENOSPC lately, and we've had accumulating > processes on dillon, trying to sync to static. AFAICT, the script used > (static-update-component) sudoes to

di-netboot-assistant_0.55_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:45:33 +0300 Source: di-netboot-assistant Binary: di-netboot-assistant Architecture: source all Version: 0.55 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Processing of di-netboot-assistant_0.55_amd64.changes

di-netboot-assistant_0.55_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: di-netboot-assistant_0.55.dsc di-netboot-assistant_0.55.tar.xz di-netboot-assistant_0.55_all.deb di-netboot-assistant_0.55_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new, oldstable-proposed-updates

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:24:19 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-8-netboot-arm64 debian-installer-8-netboot-armel debian-installer-8-netboot-armhf

Re: Debian Installer Buster Alpha 3 release

Cyril Brulebois wrote: > * cryptsetup: > - Upgrade to upstream version 2.0.0. Since this version of cryptsetup adds support for dm-integrity (https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/wikis/DMIntegrity), are there any plans to eventually support it in the installer so that I can have a root

debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

Mapping jessie to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 17:24:19 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Binary: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u5.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u5.tar.xz debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64_20150422+deb8u5_all.deb

Re: d-i upload for 8.11 (was: Re: Scheduling final Jessie point release, 8.11)

Hi, Adam D. Barratt (2018-06-18): > Yes, d-i and dini are the last things I'm expecting for the point > release; everything else has been in place for at least a couple of > dinstalls already. > > If the d-i upload could happen before the end of tomorrow, that should > still give us plenty of

Re: Bug#901352: unblock: ca-certificates/20180409

Hi, Michael Shuler (2018-06-13): > On 06/13/2018 02:35 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > and I see no severity downgrade in that bug report? > > It was upgraded back to serious again, yesterday, after some testing > feedback. Right, I think I misworded what I meant, sorry about any confusion. >

Debian Installer Buster Alpha 3 release

The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the third alpha release of the installer for Debian 10 "Buster". Improvements in this release * apt-setup: - If installing from a single-desktop single CD image, comment it out from sources.list after

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 774331 +unreproducible Bug #774331 [debootstrap] debootstrap: fakechroot variant fails with fakechroot not found Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 774331:

Bug#901851: Dell LATITUDE E7250 unattended network install failure

Package: installation-reports Boot method: network Image version: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/stretch/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/netboot.tar.gz ( Installer build: 20170615+deb9u3 ) Date: Tue Jun 19 12:05:57 CEST 2018 Machine: Dell LATITUDE E7250 Processor: Intel

Processed (with 1 error): RE: debootstrap: fakechroot variant fails with fakechroot not found

Processing control commands: > tags -1 +unreprodocible Unknown tag/s: unreprodocible. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody

Bug#774331: debootstrap: fakechroot variant fails with fakechroot not found

control: tags -1 +unreprodocible Hi, Running "$ fakechroot fakeroot /usr/sbin/debootstrap --variant=fakechroot jessie jessie" on Jessie works fine, on Stretch and newer fakechroot causes segfault but it is not debootstrap's fault. Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > And in debootstrap.log: > >

Re: debootstrap/1.0.102 appears to break debuerreotype autopkgtest

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:23:18 +0200 Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > I'm not sure why >= stretch should be more complicated? Something like > [1] (untested) should work? > > [1] > Aha, it means just clicking

Re: debootstrap/1.0.102 appears to break debuerreotype autopkgtest

Hideki Yamane writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:09:17 +0200 > Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> The `-k` option doesn't work for older releases (some packages do >> replace files there). It should always be used for newer releases (>= >> stretch) to have less differences between --merged-usr

Re: debootstrap/1.0.102 appears to break debuerreotype autopkgtest

Hi, On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:09:17 +0200 Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The `-k` option doesn't work for older releases (some packages do > replace files there). It should always be used for newer releases (>= > stretch) to have less differences between --merged-usr and > --no-merged-usr. >= stretch

Re: debootstrap/1.0.102 appears to break debuerreotype autopkgtest

Hideki Yamane writes: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:15:51 -0700 > Tianon Gravi wrote: >> > Instead of stretch simply defaulting to non-merged-usr, it's now >> > _blacklisted_ from merged-usr, even if I explicitly specify >> > "--merged-usr", right? Is that the intended implementation here? > > Yes,