Sorry, I can't figure out how to retitle the bug. I can't seem able to
email a single line instead of two lines to control@ so it can't retitle
the bug:
"EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume icon, label,
description and selectability of installation media"
Also the original title
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 967920 EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume
Bug #967920 [debian-installer] EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper
volume icon,
Changed Bug title to 'EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume'
from 'EFI:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 967920 EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume icon,
Bug #967920 [debian-installer] EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper
volume
Changed Bug title to 'EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume
icon,' from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 967920 EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume
Bug #967920 [debian-installer] debian-installer: ewq
Changed Bug title to 'EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume'
from 'debian-installer: ewq'.
> icon, label,
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Diego Escalante Urrelo
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: debian-installer: EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:04 PM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Diego Escalante, le mar. 04 août 2020 18:55:40 -0500, a ecrit:
> > The GRUB prompt indeed took over the efifb resolution, but because it was
> > using the default font, it was really tiny text.
>
> Mmm, so on your system the resolution you
Diego Escalante, le mar. 04 août 2020 18:55:40 -0500, a ecrit:
> The GRUB prompt indeed took over the efifb resolution, but because it was
> using the default font, it was really tiny text.
Mmm, so on your system the resolution you are getting in grub is already
high and thus tiny text there?
On mié, ago 5, 2020 at 12:50 am, Samuel Thibault
wrote:
Hello,
Diego Escalante Urrelo, le mar. 04 août 2020 17:39:34 -0500, a ecrit:
I was trying to figure out how to fix this
Mmm, actually this should already be fixed, in the context of
#910227. In the latest images we just keep the
A patch for this issue has now been submitted in:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967918
A new report was created since we ultimately propose to fix this in
partman-efi instead of partman-auto.
Package: partman-efi
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Some installation processes (e.g. The installation of vanilla Debian
ARM64 on a Raspberry Pi 4 in UEFI mode) greatly benefit from extracting
the Debian installation files from mini.iso or netinst.iso into an ESP
and then using that same ESP
Package: console-setup
Followup-For: Bug #859458
X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org
I seem unable to reproduce in my current unstable/sid system. At first I
thought it was because I had switched to `dracut`, but seems like I
can't reproduce the original issue with `initramfs-tools`.
Perhaps
Hello,
Diego Escalante Urrelo, le mar. 04 août 2020 17:39:34 -0500, a ecrit:
> I was trying to figure out how to fix this
Mmm, actually this should already be fixed, in the context of
#910227. In the latest images we just keep the grub resolution, which in
my tests is fine. That's lazy of
Package: debian-installer
Followup-For: Bug #746966
X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org
I was trying to figure out how to fix this so that there's a smarter
default that figures out if the screen is way too "big" (hinting that it
is HIDPI).
I thought this should go in console-setup, but perhaps it
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #769916,
regarding installation-reports: d-i jessie daily 20141116-5
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #769749,
regarding it installed a system that wouldn't boot without
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #766815,
regarding installation-reports: please omit "quiet" option
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767474,
regarding Installation kFreeBSD-amd64, Kernel 10.1: OK, but
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767222,
regarding preseeding of daily snapshot of debian jessie
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768464,
regarding preseed install of Debian Jessie failing
to be
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #766423,
regarding Installation-Report kFreeBSD daily build: no
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #767465,
regarding Installed Debian Jessie fails to recognize USB
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #765402,
regarding installation-reports: Incomplete testing images
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #765628,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #766400,
regarding installation-reports: [armhf] Netgear ReadyNAS104
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #766523,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764587,
regarding installation-reports: After successful
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #763008,
regarding installation-reports: wheezy installer (partman?)
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764683,
regarding Bugreport installation-reports
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764001,
regarding installation-reports: I cannot proceed from
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764505,
regarding kFreeBSD-amd64: Beta installer 2 seems to work
to
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #762590,
regarding Installation Report: linux-amd64 (daily) mostly
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #762287,
regarding Debian Jessie installer report and problems
to be
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #762401,
regarding Installation kFreeBSD-amd64: OK with quirks
to be
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #761588,
regarding installation-report: kfreebsd on BigV.io public
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #764995,
regarding Package: installation-reports
to be marked as
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #759029,
regarding installation-report: loongson-2f: Jessie Beta 1
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #760420,
regarding installation-reports: jessie beta1 amd64 on
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #760062,
regarding installation-reports: Successful Jessie Beta 1
Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2020 00:07:32 +0200
with message-id <20200805000732.bcd14bc42a1f57a24212c...@mailbox.org>
and subject line Re: Mass-closing old installation-report bugs --- round 2
has caused the Debian Bug report #759177,
regarding installation-reports: network KO with graphical
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> I'm closing the reports below.
>
> That's installation-reports for Debian 7 with
> - undefined errors
> - problems which are likely to have been fixed in the meantime
> - successful installation
>
> Because of the age, there is no chance to analyse them further and
Le dimanche 2 août à 00h 13mn 59s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On 8/2/20 12:16 AM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> >>> + is_ports_architecture=$(cat /usr/lib/choose-mirror/port_architecture)
> >> Is there any good reason for this to be a subshell instead of read(1)?
> >
> > This
Le vendredi 31 juillet à 13h 15mn 58s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> наб, le ven. 31 juil. 2020 12:50:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > > I wonder if the versioned
X-Debbugs-CC: Samuel Thibault
Hi,
here is a revised proposal of a patch for this bug report.
It is supposed that the relevant part [2] of the patch proposal [1]
for bug #964248 is applied.
I hope it will help to find a solution.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
[1] :
Hi,
Here is an updated patch proposal. It is supposed that the
relevant parts [2] of the patch proposal [1] for
bug #964248 are applied.
I hope it will help to find a solution.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
[1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964248#52
[2] : Here is an excerpt of
Hi,
Here is a patch proposal for this bug report. It aims :
- to be compatible with the install CD produced by debian-cd
- to avoid hard-coding a list of architectures in the Debian-Ports repository
- to make the use of the 'unreleased' distribution switchable.
I hope it will help to find a
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:09:01AM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> I'm closing the reports below.
>
> That's installation-reports for Debian 7 with
> - undefined errors
> - problems which are likely to have been fixed in the meantime
> - successful installation
>
> Because of the age, there is
Source: cdebconf-entropy
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gtk2 oldlibs
Control: block 947713 by -1
This package has Build-Depends on GTK 2 (libgtk2.0-dev), or produces
binary packages with a Depends on GTK 2.
GTK 2 was superseded by GTK 3 in 2011
Processing control commands:
> block 947713 by -1
Bug #947713 [libgtk2.0-0] libgtk2.0-0: is deprecated and mostly unmaintained
947713 was blocked by: 967264 967276 967260 967246 967254 967250 967251 967255
967263 967259 967261 967265 967253 967269 967248 967278 885135 967286 967267
967262
Processing control commands:
> block 947713 by -1
Bug #947713 [libgtk2.0-0] libgtk2.0-0: is deprecated and mostly unmaintained
947713 was blocked by: 967254 967255 967247 967276 967249 967280 967261 967248
967274 967275 967262 967256 967257 959090 967245 967263 967244 967250 959083
967284
Source: cdebconf-terminal
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gtk2 oldlibs
Control: block 947713 by -1
This package has Build-Depends on GTK 2 (libgtk2.0-dev), or produces
binary packages with a Depends on GTK 2.
GTK 2 was superseded by GTK 3 in 2011
Source: cdebconf
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gtk2 oldlibs
Control: block 947713 by -1
This package has Build-Depends on GTK 2 (libgtk2.0-dev), or produces
binary packages with a Depends on GTK 2.
GTK 2 was superseded by GTK 3 in 2011 (see
Processing control commands:
> block 947713 by -1
Bug #947713 [libgtk2.0-0] libgtk2.0-0: is deprecated and mostly unmaintained
947713 was blocked by: 967244 967273 967250 967268 967260 967281 967258 967277
967242 967285 967265 967269 967243 967274 967255 959083 967259 967272 967280
967256
Package: src:discover-data
Version: 2.2013.01.11
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
Package: src:debian-installer
Version: 20200314
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
54 matches
Mail list logo