Processed: unarchiving 1061899, severity of 1061899 is important, user release.debian....@packages.debian.org ...

2024-03-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unarchive 1061899
Bug #1061899 {Done: Michael Hudson-Doyle } 
[src:comedilib] comedilib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1061899
> severity 1061899 important
Bug #1061899 {Done: Michael Hudson-Doyle } 
[src:comedilib] comedilib: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
sebas...@debian.org).
> usertags 1061899 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1061928
Bug #1061928 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:avro-c] avro-c: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1061928
> severity 1061928 important
Bug #1061928 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:avro-c] avro-c: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1061928 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062051
Bug #1062051 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:cglm] cglm: NMU 
diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062051
> severity 1062051 important
Bug #1062051 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:cglm] cglm: NMU 
diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062051 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062184
Bug #1062184 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:gnucap] gnucap: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062184
> severity 1062184 important
Bug #1062184 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:gnucap] gnucap: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062184 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062277
Bug #1062277 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:libdvbpsi] 
libdvbpsi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062277
> severity 1062277 important
Bug #1062277 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:libdvbpsi] 
libdvbpsi: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062277 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062291
Bug #1062291 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:libfido2] 
libfido2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062291
> severity 1062291 important
Bug #1062291 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:libfido2] 
libfido2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062291 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062333
Bug #1062333 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:discover] 
discover: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062333
> severity 1062333 important
Bug #1062333 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:discover] 
discover: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062333 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062632
Bug #1062632 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [src:libsolv] libsolv: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062632
> severity 1062632 important
Bug #1062632 {Done: Luca Boccassi } [src:libsolv] libsolv: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062632 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1062865
Bug #1062865 {Done: Jochen Sprickerhof } 
[src:ros-bond-core] ros-bond-core: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1062865
> severity 1062865 important
Bug #1062865 {Done: Jochen Sprickerhof } 
[src:ros-bond-core] ros-bond-core: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1062865 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1063105
Bug #1063105 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:alsa-oss] 
alsa-oss: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1063105
> severity 1063105 important
Bug #1063105 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:alsa-oss] 
alsa-oss: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1063105 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1063140
Bug #1063140 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:mpg123] mpg123: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1063140
> severity 1063140 important
Bug #1063140 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:mpg123] mpg123: 
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> usertags 1063140 time-t-downgrade
Usertags were: time-t-downgrade.
Usertags are now: time-t-downgrade.
> unarchive 1063888
Bug #1063888 {Done: Steve Langasek } [src:zfs-linux] 
zfs-linux: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Unarchived Bug 1063888
> severity 1063888 important

lvm2 udebs vs. libaio1-udeb (was: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid)

2024-03-21 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Hi,

Cyril Brulebois  (2024-03-21):
> I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb
> is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of
> `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies
> would be sufficient (and might happen at some point anyway).
> 
> For the sake of consistency, I think I'm tempted to suggest a revert of
> the udeb part (it wasn't renamed so there's a contents vs. package name
> mismatch anyway).

Checking libaio's changelog (last mail got sent a little too fast,
sorry) is enlightening: this library required special attention and
wasn't just about getting rebuilt with a different package name.

  
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1509816/accepted-libaio-03113-6-source-into-unstable/

Guillem is absolutely right regarding avoiding the roundtrip to NEW and
d-i's not caring, but some kind of heads-up to debian-boot@ (now cc'd)
would have been welcome.

It'd be nice if the Debian LVM Team (hello waldi) could pick it up from
here and see whether requesting a binNMU is what makes most sense here,
or if there other plans on the t64 front. A local, cowbuilder-powered
rebuild of unstable's lvm2 results in udebs referencing libaio.so.1t64
as expected (i.e. libaio1t64's shlibs).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature