On 22.12.2012 20:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (22/12/2012):
Please go ahead; thanks.
Uploaded, thanks.
Flagged for acceptance in to p-u.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
On 25.12.2012 18:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
### l10n, armhf/vexpress, powerc vs. smp:
unblock base-installer/1.130
unblock-udeb base-installer/1.130
### fix l10n bugs:
unblock espeakup/1:0.71-13
unblock-udeb espeakup/1:0.71-13
### kernel:
unblock linux/3.2.35-2
unblock-udeb linux/3.2.35-2
###
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 17:48 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Including debian-devel@ to let people know where we stand.)
Dropped again for unblock stuff.
### blindly trusting Samuel
unblock brltty/4.4-7
unblock-udeb brltty/4.4-7
Done in #696453.
### add preseeding support for
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:25 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
# fix X11-to-text fallback for brltty-based installs
unblock brltty/4.4-8
unblock-udeb brltty/4.4-8
# fix info messages rendering
unblock cdebconf/0.181
unblock-udeb cdebconf/0.181
# workaround for #652946 + better error
On 05.02.2013 23:55, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
(05/02/2013):
or:
* apply the following tested and working patch from #699742 in
debian-installer, […]
Except that this “tested and working
On 07.02.2013 14:46, Joey Hess wrote:
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Joey Hess jo...@debian.org (07/02/2013):
This can be done easily, just upload d-i to t-p-u. d-i uploads are
already built with udebs from testing, for similar reasons.
There seems to be an unholy fear of using t-p-u for anything
Hi,
We're somewhat overdue with the next Squeeze point release (6.0.7) and
it'd be good to get it done before the wheezy release, so that we can
pull in some upgrade fixes. As an opening gambit, some proposed dates,
all of which appear to currently work for me:
February 23rd
March 2nd
March
On 12.02.2013 02:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
One or other of us will then need to merge the squeeze-security
branch
into squeeze and upload -48 in time for the point release.
Is there an ETA for that? Sorry for chasing, but if we're going to go
for the 23rd (which is looking likely atm) we'd be
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.7) is scheduled for Saturday
February 23rd. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding Monday
(18th).
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the builds somewhere as
they become available for anyone interested in testing.
Version 2.6.32-48 has also been uploaded.
Flagged for
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the builds somewhere as
they become available for anyone interested
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security
updates; will that mean we need another update in p-u?
Possibly; an alternative would be to release
Hi,
pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a udeb.
Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 15:36 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
Agreed; and I think I was unclear. I was taking for granted that we
*will* do a 46squeeze2 now w/ the CVE-2013-0871 fix and bypass
46squeeze1. 46squeeze2 would provide the security-only option.
The question was whether or not we should
Hi,
I unblocked xorg-server for a kSBD fix to make the recent qt4-x11
security fix work on that platform. Could I have a udeb ack to go with
it, please?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
Sorry, me again.
libgcrypt11 1.5.0-4 contains a few small patches fixing RC bugs
affecting other packages. I'm happy unblocking it, but can we add it to
the unblock-udeb request list please? (Would a single mail with several
requests in be more helpful?)
Thanks,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 25.02.2013 12:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (24/02/2013):
I unblocked xorg-server for a kSBD fix to make the recent qt4-x11
security fix work on that platform. Could I have a udeb ack to go
with
it, please?
As expected, no obvious regressions
On 25.02.2013 13:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (18/02/2013):
pixman has a small fix for a security issue (CVE-2013-1591) and a
udeb.
Please could I have an {n,}ack for an unblock-udeb?
No obvious regression spotted in the graphical installer, d-i ack
On Sun, 2013-03-03 at 22:04 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I've finally been able to perform some run-time tests with the -5
udeb, which seems to work fine as far as assisted ciphered LVM is
confirmed. d-i ACK accordingly.
Thanks; unblock-udeb added.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 05:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Release managers, please unblock/urgent libdebian-installer/0.87 into
testing. See previous mail as to why I don't think it should have a
big impact on other components. An image rebuilt with new udebs
doesn't seem to explode too badly
retitle 356751 RM: mysql-dfsg -- RoM; superseded by mysql-dfsg-5.0
retitle 356752 RM: mysql-dfsg-4,1 -- RoM; superseded by mysql-dfsg-5.0
retitle 356571 Package: installation-reports
retitle 356572 bash dependency
thanks
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 01:10 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 14 March
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
partman-nbd
Not done. The files client.c, oef and opdr have all disappeared
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
win32-loader
Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do
so before the corresponding files in /tools/ have been updated.
On that note - ftp-master
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
win32-loader
Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do
so before
On 25.03.2012 11:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
win32-loader
Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 20:39 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:12:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:51 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer.
That was nearly two weeks ago now; what's the current status?
Were you aiming to include the recent base-installer changes regarding
kernel selection? If so the upload
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 13:35 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:04, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:51 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer.
That was nearly two weeks
Hi,
6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
myself with, some suggested dates:
May 5/6: Probably doable; would mean we need to close p-u-NEW over the
coming weekend.
May 12/13: York BSP. Probably
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 21:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
6.0.5 is somewhat overdue now and I've been procrastinating over
organising it for a while. So before I find something else to distract
myself with, some suggested dates:
It looks like the discussion has converged towards:
May 12/13
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
To what we had for a1 basically:
get CD images built (Steve, yey!);
test them
finish announce mail
mail to to d-d-a if all above work
How are things going with that?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 04:49:40PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 16:31 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
To what we had for a1 basically:
get CD images built (Steve, yey!);
test them
finish announce mail
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.5) is scheduled for Saturday
May 12th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend
(5/6th).
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I can do an alpha build of CDs whenever they're desired, just let me
know when things are looking ready.
Ah, I'd somewhat assumed that Otavio's Steve, yey! above meant
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 23:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 17:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 16:54 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I can do an alpha build of CDs whenever they're desired, just let me
know when things are looking ready.
Ah
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 15:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
So, in the absence of any replies or better ideas on IRC, I've scheduled
a binNMU for d-i on amd64. If that goes okay then I'll do the other
architectures and we can look at where we go from there.
Apparently I missed that one
On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 03:18 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:42PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Thank you also for applying the fix David, although it would be nice
to watch credits in the future.
It would also have been nice to upload a new version focusing on
On 25.06.2012 13:56, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
This is holding open-iscsi's propagation to Wheezy. Please advise
what should be done.
Well, fixing:
* open-iscsi-udeb/armel unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
* open-iscsi-udeb/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: scsi-modules
would
Hi,
In anticipation of the block-udeb hints being re-enabled, I've been
reviewing the currently commented hints and comparing them to the
packages in the archive which currently produce udebs.
For those packages which were not previously in the list, I've made a
few assumptions, detailed below.
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 08:29 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising:
I didn't see eject which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to
allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its
On 26.06.2012 16:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/06/2012):
- udeb freeze.
debian-release, please put that back into place. Thanks already!
Done.
As discussed, I've enabled all of the blocks, including those in the
can be handled by britney category. If
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 17:59 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:07:50PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 26.06.2012 16:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (25/06/2012):
- udeb freeze.
debian-release, please put that back into place. Thanks
On 08.07.2012 17:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
please consider unblocking (and possibly urgenting) the following
udeb-producing packages.
All unblocked and urgented; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On 10.07.2012 00:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
# already ACK'd in #680676:
busybox/1:1.20.0-5
# l10n and misc changes:
live-installer/36
# l10n mostly, a few new features:
network-console/1.37
# hardening flags + linux-any-ification:
pcmciautils/018-8
# apparent bug fix/workaround for gcc 4.7,
On 03.09.2012 09:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (02/09/2012):
- urgent d-i
Done, along with an unblock.
- start building installation images (I think it needs at least a
dinstall + a mirror pulse though); putting them into a “dot-dir”
for the time being
Hi,
loop-aes-utils was removed from unstable a while ago (see #680748).
It's still in testing, because britney won't remove it due to a
dependency from the faux package d-i-meta-faux.
d-i-m-f ensures that a number of packages important to d-i are not
accidentally removed from testing. I'm not
On 19.09.2012 10:04, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (19/09/2012):
loop-aes-utils was removed from unstable a while ago (see #680748).
It's still in testing, because britney won't remove it due to a
dependency from the faux package d-i-meta-faux.
[...]
Does
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't
seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi,
a round of d-i binNMUs
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 19:11 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
# XXX: second look appreciated
# xz compression + 4 RC bug fixes
unblock grub2/1.99-23
unblock-udeb grub2/1.99-23
Looks sane enough to me.
# single bugfix for pf crash, no-op for d-i:
unblock kfreebsd-9/9.0-6
unblock-udeb
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:10 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of
interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering
whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed?
For the record; done.
Regards,
Adm
--
To
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 02:01 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
| libfontenc
| libx11
| libxau
| libxcb
| libxcursor
| libxdmcp
| libxext
| libxfixes
| libxfont
| libxi
| libxinerama
| libxkbfile
| libxrender
[...]
| x11-xkb-utils
| xft
| xkeyboard-config
|
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 20:19 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 02:01 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
I can't see any of the above in britney's list of udebs, either as can
be auto-migrated or need approval from the d-i team before
migrating (presumably because they're new
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:14 +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Michael Schutte wrote:
Please consider letting kbd 1.15.1-3 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to
testing.
*ping*
-boot, any objections?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 21:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:14 +0200, Michael Schutte wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Michael Schutte wrote:
Please consider letting kbd 1.15.1-3 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to
testing.
*ping*
-boot, any
On Sat, May 8, 2010 18:00, Frans Pop wrote:
I've just uploaded an updated version of choose-mirror. There's only a fix
of a minor bug from the previous release, but the upload also contains an
updated mirror list.
Accepted.
Note that this update means debian-installer should also be updated
Hi,
The next point release for the etch oldstable distribution, 4.0r9, is
scheduled for Saturday, 22nd May.
This will be the final point release for etch, which will be moved to
archive.debian.org in the near future.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
The next Lenny point release (5.0.5) is scheduled for Saturday, June
26th.
Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of June 19th - 20th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 04:23 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
Hi all,
Would it be possible to unblock busybox? It has been waiting for 117
days with no RC bugs. If it is not
[explicitly CCing Andrew in case he didn't spot the original message on
-release]
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 00:00 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 0, Andrew Pollock apoll...@debian.org wrote:
I still await an ACK from the release team.
an ACK :)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To
Hi,
The icu transition is ready to go, but currently stalled by brllty which
is blocked because of its udeb.
As I understand it, the udeb does not use icu so should be safe to
unblock in that regard; could we do so please?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 19:04 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 08/06/2010 04:04 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
It will also fix the symptoms of #586404.
debian-boot, I don't see any reply of you, yet?
otavio acked the unblocking of 160-1 on IRC, which migrated a few days
ago.
Regards,
Adam
--
Hi,
busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were
asked by Aurelien whether it would be possible to migrate netcfg as
well.
netcfg is on the cannot automatically migrate without approval udeb
list
Hi,
The new version of rescue fixes an RC bug (#505111) but is currently
blocked from migrating due to being on the needs approval udeb list.
Would it be possible to unblock and migrate the package currently? If
not, please let us know when we could do so.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 12:41 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
ack for netcfg and libdebian-installer.
Thanks; both unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
partman-md fixes an RC bug (#591917). Would it be ok to unblock it?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
The next Lenny point release (5.0.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
September 4th.
Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of August 28th - 29th.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 17:48 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
debian-boot and debian-release,
please hint pciutils/1:3.1.7-5 (has udeb)
Although pciutils has a udeb, it isn't on the list of udeb-producing
packages which need -boot approval before migrating; unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 16:27 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
release team: please urgent debian-installer/20130412
Done (and unblocked, obviously :)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 07:57 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
release team: please unblock+urgent debian-installer/20130415
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 21:28 +0200, mail.pou...@laposte.net wrote:
Running debootstrap --arch=armhf wheezy fails with the following error:
[...]
W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up to
five times.
[...]
insserv: warning: script
Control: severity -1 normal
[Please make sure you copy the bug report when replying]
On 17.04.2013 09:29, mail.pou...@laposte.net wrote:
The exact command was:
# debootstrap --arch=armhf wheezy /mnt
On /mnt, I've mounted a virgin new hdd formatted as ext4.
On this hdd, I've restored a one
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
tags 686502 + wheezy-ignore
usertags 686502 + wheezy-can-defer
thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 09:51 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (08/04/2013):
We're unlikely to met all the conditions for this bug in d-i or
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 00:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
from a little testing locally, it looks like an improvement over the
current situation in wheezy, and I'd be happy to see those updates in
wheezy (for d-i wheezy rc2 if feasible/reasonable).
As mentioned on IRC, I wouldn't want to
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 04:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
(a) Update firmware-iwlwifi to include the new firmware. Slightly risky
as our users haven't been testing it.
(b Change the driver to request firmware ABI 5 then 4. Trivial code
change, and only has a negative effect for users that
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 14:33 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 14:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 04:29 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
(b Change the driver to request firmware ABI 5 then 4. Trivial code
change, and only has a negative effect for users
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 17:17 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le jeudi, 18 avril 2013 12.55:09, Steven Chamberlain a écrit :
It would be really helpful if you are able to test again with pulseaudio
(+ libpulse0) patched with:
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 15:37 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (25/04/2013):
I opened #698914 a while back, concerned about the lack of support
in grub and os-prober for detecting Windows 8 on UEFI systems so
[...]
We'd need a d-i wheezy rc3. Not sure there's
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 15:01 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 15:37 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (25/04/2013):
I opened #698914 a while back, concerned about the lack of support
in grub and os-prober for detecting Windows 8 on UEFI
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 22:36 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
While I have no ways of testing those things, the patches look good to
me, please unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent grub2 os-prober.
All done.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 21:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 22:36 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
While I have no ways of testing those things, the patches look good to
me, please unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent grub2 os-prober.
All done.
As mentioned on IRC, grub2 has
On 2013-04-30 1:20, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 29 Apr 2013 23:57:30 +0200, a écrit :
Since we're going for rc3 around wednesday, please upload ASAP (so
that it gets dinstalled before tuesday's morning britney run).
Now done.
Approved.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706112 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 706112 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 00:34 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I suggest we work towards having a suitable grub-installer for
inclusion into r1 (which will possibly be released roughly 1
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 18:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
for the time being, I think I'll concentrate on preparing wheezy r1. I
also think we can live without a d-i release in the next few weeks, so
possible transient breakages in udeb-producing packages right now
shouldn't be much of an
Hi,
The first point release for wheezy (7.1) is scheduled for Saturday
June 15th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 03:26 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I realise there's now just a week before the point release, which
doesn't leave much time for updating the installer even if I upload
right now (which I'm not about to). Sorry for letting this slide.
Supposing I can upload on Saturday,
[tl;dr - can we avoid adding and maintaining a wheezy-r0 suite?]
Hi,
For squeeze, we used the squeeze-r0 suite to ensure that a number of
source packages were retained in the archive for licensing reasons, as
they were used in the builds of other packages. In most cases this has
been replaced by
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 18:35 +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
[I don't appear to have Jonathan's mail - and nor do the list archives -
so piggy-backing on Joey's.]
We're much longer overdue for oldstable (February) than we are for stable
(June); if we stagger them,
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 14:59 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
we should start thinking about dates for the 7.2 and 6.0.8 point
releases. Which week-ends in the coming months would work for
ftpmaster, press and cd? (We'd need one date
On 2013-09-09 17:09, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Hi all,
Please CC me if somebody responds as I'm not subscribed to the
list/s.
Does anybody have/know of a roadmap to getting the latest syslinux
perhaps the one which is now in experimental to testing ?
You might want to ask the syslinux maintainer
Hi,
The next point release for wheezy (7.2) is scheduled for Saturday
October 12th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.8) is scheduled for Saturday
October 19th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the preceding
weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
The next point release for wheezy (7.3) is scheduled for Saturday
December 14th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:38 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[ What about an alias so that we don't miss anyone? ]
Yeah, it's been suggested recently by someone else too.
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-12-03):
The next point release for wheezy (7.3) is scheduled for Saturday
Hi,
The next point release for wheezy (7.4) is scheduled for Saturday
February 8th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
The next point release for squeeze (6.0.9) is scheduled for Saturday
February 15th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
The next point release for wheezy (7.5) is scheduled for Saturday,
April 26th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
(Somewhat belatedly) it's time to organise the next point releases for
Wheezy and Squeeze (7.6 and 6.0.10).
This will be the final point release for Squeeze, incorporating as many
of the packages from opu and squeeze-security as we can (some will
have to be skipped - there's a security
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 00:03 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:53:21PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
(Somewhat belatedly) it's time to organise the next point releases for
Wheezy and Squeeze (7.6 and 6.0.10).
[...]
Apologies for the delay in responding...
I believe I
Hi,
The next point release for wheezy (7.6) is scheduled for Saturday,
July 12th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi,
The next (and final) point release for squeeze (6.0.10) is scheduled
for Saturday, July 19th. Oldstable NEW will be frozen during the
preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
101 - 200 of 522 matches
Mail list logo
