new udebs

Hi, There are currently some udeb-producing packages which are neither on the needs approval from a d-i RM before migrating list, nor the explicit can migrate at will list; from a quick scan, many of them appear to be kfreebsd related. I've listed these below; please could you confirm whether

Re: new udebs

On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: There are currently some udeb-producing packages which are neither on the needs approval from a d-i RM before migrating list, nor the explicit can migrate at will list; from a quick scan, many of them appear to be kfreebsd related

Re: new udebs

On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 20:05 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: debian-ports-archive-keyring btrfs-tools espeak isc-dhcp freebsd-libs freebsd-utils libbsd libfakekey libpciaccess libxrender matchbox-keyboard ufsutils zfsutils ttf-sinhala-lklug Those are auto.

Re: Bug#605274: unblock: win32-loader/0.6.21

On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:42 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: Please unblock package win32-loader in its 0.6.21 version, as it includes only translation updates: win32-loader produces a udeb which is on the needs approval from d-i RMs before unblocking list; CC-ing -boot. Regards, Adam -- To

Bug#605640: apt-setup: Using squeeze-updates for volatile

Package: apt-setup Version: 0.49 Tags: patch Hi, Starting with the squeeze release, the volatile repository will be replaced by the $dist-updates suite, which will be carried on the standard ftp.d.o mirrors instead of residing on volatile.d.o. As discussed on IRC, please find attached a patch

Re: Bug#605274: unblock: win32-loader/0.6.21

On Mon, November 29, 2010 09:38, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: Le Sunday 28 November 2010 18:01:55 Adam D. Barratt, vous avez écrit : On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:42 +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: Please unblock package win32-loader in its 0.6.21 version, as it includes only translation updates

Re: please approve and unblock pciutils/1:3.1.7-6 (has udeb)

On Fri, November 26, 2010 06:45, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: pciutils/1:3.1.7-6 has the latest pci.ids file debian-boot please approve pciutils/1:3.1.7-6 (has udeb) debian-release please unblock pciutils/1:3.1.7-6 Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bug#606981: unblock: kbd/1.15.2-2

On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 17:16 +0100, Michael Schutte wrote: Hello -release and -boot, Please approve (udeb) and unblock package kbd: As discussed in #606186, users are currently asked for their keyboard layout twice during the installation process; this is particularly annoying considering

Re: 7.8 dates

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 20:33 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: 31st / 1st - Fine for me I spotted earlier that that weekend is FOSDEM, which presumably changes the answer for at least some people. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Bug#772898: win32-loader testing and newer fails with TRANSLATE error

On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 10:09 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: @Release Team, could we please schedule binNMUs for nsis ? nmu nsis_2.46-9 . ALL . -m Rebuild with gcc-mingw-w64 14 to ensure that NSISdl.dll doesn't depend on a shared libwinpthread-1 Done. Regards, Adam -- To

Re: 7.8 dates

On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 16:19 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: In theory the 7.8 point release should be in December, but that's often a pain to organise. So let's look at January instead: 3rd / 4th - I'm busy on the Saturday 10th

Re: 7.8 dates

On 2014-12-21 20:12, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 04:20:16PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 16:19 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: [...] I have no fixed plans yet, but would prefer to keep 3rd/4th free. The other days all look fine. Based on other responses,

Upcoming stable point release (7.8)

Hi, The next point release for wheezy (7.8) is scheduled for Saturday, January 10th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC2, part 1

On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 14:21 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: I have just looked at the migration status for linux 3.16.7-ckt7-1 at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux: * 5 days old (needed 5 days) * Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (check

Re: bastardizing packages or stepping down

Hi, Making no comment on the remainder of the mail: On 2015-03-05 10:38, Michael Tokarev wrote: And since I can't do my work, I'm stepping down from being busybox maintainer, and am kindly asking the release team to remove my name from debian/control file in busybox, so that people don't blame

Re: bastardizing packages or stepping down

Hi, Bah, so much for a quick response that I thought was simple and uncontroversial. :-) On 2015-03-05 12:08, Sam Hartman wrote: Adam, let's assume for the moment I've got that right. I'm trying to connect with the frustration I'd feel if I were told that I didn't even have the power to

Re: Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

On 2015-04-17 18:22, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello Niels, Niels Thykier [2015-04-17 17:55 +0200]: Just to clarify, are we still intending to do a systemd update prior to Jessie with -17 and then now also a p-u (i.e. for 8.1) for ecryptfs? That's still my intent, yes, primarily to avoid people

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20150422 hint it into testing

On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 03:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Release team, please hint it into testing: unblock debian-installer/20150422 urgent debian-installer/20150422 Added. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC4

On 2015-04-22 12:52, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi people, here's a single round of unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent hints for the upcoming d-i upload. It's what we would normally either call RC4 or final or something like this, but I don't think it makes sense to announce it separately. Announcing

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

[Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20150418 hint it into testing

On 2015-04-18 13:46, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Release team, please hint it into testing: unblock debian-installer/20150418 urgent debian-installer/20150418 Done. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: Hints for d-i jessie RC3, part 1

On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 20:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy. Please note that some are just unblock (installation-guide) or just unblock-udeb (systemd) and

Re: Bug#782267: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20150324

On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 19:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Control: tag -1 d-i confirmed Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2015-04-09): Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock x-debbugs-cc:

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue

Re: Bug#787626: jessie-pu: package libdebian-installer/0.99+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On 2015-06-03 14:46, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-06-03): Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2015-06-03 14:35, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Martin noticed libdebian-installer in jessie (and a few hours ago in unstable…) doesn't know

Please copy tools/win32-loader/unstable to .../testing

Hi, As discussed with OdyX, please copy the current version of tools/win32-loader from unstable/ to testing/. We'll then unblock the source package, so that we can get it migrated before the 8.1 point release (which includes a version of win32-loader that's newer than the current version in

Upcoming stable point release (8.1)

Hi, The first point release for jessie (8.1) is scheduled for Saturday, June 6th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 09:56 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

press@ - ping? :-) On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time

8.2 and 7.9 planning

Hi, We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay 26th/27th - looks okay From a quick chat, it appears that the CD team are okay with

Re: Fixing udev-udeb vs. net.ifnames for Stretch Alpha 1

On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 21:09 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2015-07-16): Uploaded and accepted into tpu, thanks. And binary builds are getting rejected due to the python3-systemd binary which was split out of src:systemd, and has a higher version in testing

Bug#768427: debian-installer: build-depends: elilo [ia64], with elilo gone away

On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 11:53 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] Applied in master: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/commit/?id=cb6d3ab https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/commit/?id=8f70fdc Release folks, please feel free to remove elilo from

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 20:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 11:20 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 11:20 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me Should be okay, provided I get internet on Aug 31st

Re: Bug#740998 closed by Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> (Bug#740998: fixed in ndisc6 1.0.1-2)

On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 16:50 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* QA upload. > >* Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #713004). > >* Add

Re: d-i/jessie upload (was: dinstall trigger problems?)

On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 01:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-08-30): > > On Sun, 2015-08-30 at 22:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > [CC += ftpmaster] > > > > > > On Sun,

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

On 2015-08-24 23:19, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 14037 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay

Re: d-i/wheezy upload (was: d-i/jessie upload)

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-09-01): > > Thanks for the quick turn-around; I've flagged that for acceptance. > > Buildds look happier this time. Will take care of d-i-n-i somewhen this > w

Re: d-i/jessie upload (was: dinstall trigger problems?)

On 2015-08-31 0:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: d-i/wheezy can binNMU'd as far as I can tell. Unfortunately not, due to what looks very much like #775136 (thanks to Julien for pointed that bug out to me). Regards, Adam

Re: d-i/wheezy upload (was: d-i/jessie upload)

On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 22:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-09-01): > > > Thanks for the quick turn-around; I've flagged that for acceptance. > > >

Re: d-i/wheezy upload (was: d-i/jessie upload)

On 2015-09-01 14:18, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-09-01): On 2015-08-31 0:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >d-i/wheezy can binNMU'd as far as I can tell. Unfortunately not, due to what looks very much like #775136 (thanks to Julien for pointed tha

Re: d-i/wheezy upload (was: d-i/jessie upload)

On 2015-09-02 9:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015-09-02): On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 22:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 23:45 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2015

Upcoming oldstable point release (7.9)

Hi, The next point release for wheezy (7.9) is scheduled for Saturday, September 5th. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Upcoming stable point release (8.2)

Hi, The next point release for jessie (8.2) is scheduled for Saturday, September 5th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

8.3 planning

Hi, We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday period coming up, getting one done in December looks like a bit of a push. On that basis, looking at January we have: 2nd/3rd - depends how much people are still suffering. :-) 9th/10th 16th/17th 23rd/24th - likely to be bad

Re: 8.3 planning

On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 19:33 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 17:22 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 16:10 -0500, Donald Norwood wrote: > > > On 12/04/2015 01:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at

Re: 8.3 planning

On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 16:10 -0500, Donald Norwood wrote: > On 12/04/2015 01:12 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:43:54PM +, Adam Barratt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We're a tad overdue for the 8.3 point release and with the holiday > >> period coming up, getting one done

Upcoming stable point release (8.3)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.3) is scheduled for Saturday, January 23rd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: Bug#805894: jessie-pu: package mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2015-11-23 17:29, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: I prepared a package for mdadm containing a patch to fix bug #784070 (https://bugs.debian.org/784070) which prevents booting a software RAID 1 in degraded mode. The diff is attached to this message. The previous package

Re: Cloud images with backports APT-enabled.

On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 00:14 -0500, Brian Gupta wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:31:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > >> > >> I started a discussion on the debian-backports mailing list. Let's see > >> how it >

Re: Bug#822678: jessie-pu: package partman-ext3/86~deb8u1

On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 18:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 19:17 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > [...] > > It might be. Having this package in a d-i release for more exposure > > might be a good idea though. I suggest we delay this until after the >

8.4 and 7.10 planning

Hi, We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD team seem happy to try it again. Some suggested dates: March 12th / 13th March 19th / 20th March 26th / 27th - Easter, holiday weekend in at least

Bug#808874: debian-installer: FTBFS on i386: 586 vs. 686

On Fri, 2015-12-25 at 18:55 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ben Hutchings (2015-12-24): > > On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 03:30 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Ben Hutchings (2015-12-24): > > > > I already updated base-installer for this, and I think the

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

-boot? On 2016-02-21 12:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD team seem happy to try it again. Some suggested dates: March 12th / 13th March 19th / 20th

Upcoming stable point release (8.4)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.4) is scheduled for Saturday, April 2nd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Upcoming oldstable point release (7.10)

Hi, The next point release for "wheezy" (7.10) is scheduled for Saturday, April 2nd. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Bug#819586: debian-installer-netboot-images: unhelpful handling of GPG errors

Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Version: 20120712 Severity: serious Justification: silently ignores failures, creating broken packages Hi, Whilst preparing the dini uploads for the upcoming point releases, on debdiffing the binary packages against the previous versions I noticed that one

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 13:07 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 12:24 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing > > both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as

Re: Bug#822678: jessie-pu: package partman-ext3/86~deb8u1

On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 19:17 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] > It might be. Having this package in a d-i release for more exposure > might be a good idea though. I suggest we delay this until after the > next one has been published (and tested a bit). I don't think we're > ready for the next

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 20:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same Saturday again.

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 15:07 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > On 21/07/16 12:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > On 2016-07-21 11:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > [...] > >> +wpa (2.3-1+deb8u4) jessie-security; ur

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 01:29 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2016-07-30): > > On Wed, 2016-07-27 at 15:07 +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > > On 21/07/16 12:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > >

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

1/07/16 11:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I realise that none of the above are actually enabled in debian/patches/series, but that makes it even more confusing that they're in the diff. Please prepare and test a package that contains only the changes relating to fixing CVE-2016-4476 and CVE

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

Control: tags -1 +moreinfo -confirmed On 2016-07-21 11:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed [...] +wpa (2.3-1+deb8u4) jessie-security; urgency=medium The distribution there should be "jessie" (and was in the earlier diff). With that changed, please feel

Re: Bug#832004: jessie-pu: package wpa/2.3-1+deb8u4

On 2016-07-21 11:25, Andrew Shadura wrote: On 21/07/16 12:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2016-07-21 11:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed [...] +wpa (2.3-1+deb8u4) jessie-security; urgency=medium The distribution there should be "jessie" (and was in t

8.6 planning

Hi, It's time for another Jessie point release; as wheezy's EOL, we don't have to worry about trying to fit two in at the same time. Some possible dates: August 20th/21st - doesn't work for me August 27th/28th - public holiday weekend in the UK; doesn't work for me September 3rd/4th

Upcoming stable point release (8.6)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.6) is scheduled for Saturday, September 17th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: 8.6 planning

Hi, Sorry for not picking this up again sooner. On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 14:19 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 23:04 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > It's time for another Jessie point release; as wheezy's EOL, we don't > > have to worry about tr

Re: Bug#850563: jessie-pu: package debian-edu-install/1.821+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 19:58 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Levsen (2017-01-07): > > as this was such a trivial change, I forgot that d-e-install also > > produces udebs and as such you probably want an KiBi ack, thus > > cc:ing

Re: 8.7 planning

On Mon, 2016-12-19 at 14:19 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Jan 7th/8th > > Jan 14th/15th Both look okay. > Jan 21st/22nd I could do the Saturday until around lunchtime but will be AFK after that and unlikely to be around on Sunday morning at least. (So on the whole, NACK.) > Jan 28th/29th -

Upcoming stable point release (8.7)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.7) is scheduled for Saturday, January 14th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: 8.8 planning

On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 12:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here > are some dates, please let us know which ones would work. > > * April 8-9 > * April 15-16 > * April 22-23 > * April 29-30 > * May 6-7 > > I know at least Adam can't

Re: Bug#855345: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u7

Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 06:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 17.02.2017 um 00:29 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing two bugs. > > Since I filed the pu request, two more issues came up which I'd like to > fix as

Re: Bug#858310: jessie-pu: package gtk+2.0/2.24.25-3+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 00:49 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > In bug #847438 it was reported that in gtk2 applications, there is a > not-so-rare situation with menus, in which the focus gets in a state > that prevents any keyboard shortcut from working at all.

Upcoming stable point release (8.8)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.8) is scheduled for Saturday, May 6th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: Bug#860276: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u8

On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 23:19 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I would like to upload a new glibc package for the next jessie release. > Here is the changelog with some additional comment: > > * Update from upstream stable branch: > - Fix PowerPC sqrt inaccuracy. Closes: #855606. > > This

Re: Bug#860276: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u8

Control: tags -1 + confirmd On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 22:52 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2017-04-23): > > While I doubt that either of the above should have any noticeable effect > > on the installer, I'd appreciate a d-i a

Re: Bug#855345: jessie-pu: package systemd/215-17+deb8u7

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 01:06 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 02.04.2017 um 23:00 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2017-04-02): > >> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. > >> > &

Re: 8.8 planning

On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 12:00 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > It's time to start thinking about our next stable point release. Here > are some dates, please let us know which ones would work. > > * April 8-9 > * April 15-16 > * April 22-23 > * April 29-30 > * May 6-7 > > I know at least Adam can't

Upcoming stable point release (9.1)

Hi, The first point release for "stretch" (9.1) is scheduled for Saturday, July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Upcoming oldstable point release (8.9)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.9) is scheduled for Saturday, July 22nd. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Regards, Adam

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:53:13PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: > >[sorry for the delay in replying] > > > >On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July.

Re: Bug#867814: stretch-pu: package ncurses/6.0+20161126-1+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 19:30 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > Recently a few flaws in the tic program and the tic library have been > detected: null pointer dereference, buffer overflow, stack smashing, you > name it. Six bugs have been reported in the Red Hat

Re: Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 15:15 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 25 juin 2017, 22.53:27 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > Looks good to me, feel free to upload, thanks. > > > > By the way, we probably shouldn't be using “stable” in URLs, but the > > target distribution (stretch

Re: Bug#867335: stretch-pu: package systemd/232-25

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2017-07-16 at 00:16 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 15.07.2017 um 23:28 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > > Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2017-07-13): > >> On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 23:25 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > [

Re: Bug#864973: stretch-pu: package win32-loader/0.8.3+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 15:15 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le dimanche, 25 juin 2017, 22.53:27 h CEST Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > > Looks good to me, feel free to upload, thanks. > > > > By the way, we probably shouldn't be using “stable” in URLs, but the > >

Re: Scheduling 9.1, maybe 8.9

[sorry for the delay in replying] On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:10 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > A month or so from 9.0 bring us to about 15th July. How would any of these > suit? Is 8.9 at the same time feasible? It's worked before. > 8/9 July (probably a bit soon) Definitely now too

Re: Bug#860276: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u8

Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 08:45 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2017-04-23 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmd > > > > On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 22:52 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > Adam D. Barratt <a...

Re: Bug#860276: jessie-pu: package glibc/2.19-18+deb8u8

On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 00:25 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2017-04-27 22:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2017-04-23 21:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 23:19 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > > I would like to upload a new glibc packa

Re: Bug#869667: stretch-pu: package xkeyboard-config/2.19-1

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo d-i On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 19:20 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > This fixes serious bug #865316 (all Indic language users were unable to > select their keyboard layouts in stretch introducing a regression. This > was caused by an earlier commit upstream which blacklisted

Re: Bug#858310: jessie-pu: package gtk+2.0/2.24.25-3+deb8u2

Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2017-04-30 at 21:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > I have now uploaded it. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam

Re: Bug#869667: stretch-pu: package xkeyboard-config/2.19-1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 19:03 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 14:35 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Feel free to upload with the debian/files issue fixed. > > > > Apologies for none of us having spotted this earlier, but: &

Re: Bug#872953: stretch-pu: package at-spi2-core/2.22.0-6

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Cyril Brulebois, on sam. 09 sept. 2017 15:42:36 +0200, wrote: > > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > > > Memory and debtree -R --rdeps-depth=99 seem to agree: dependencies > > of > > the gtk3 udeb, which we don't

Re: Bug#867814: stretch-pu: package ncurses/6.0+20161126-1+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 19:06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Sven Joachim (2017-09-06): > > Meanwhile seven new CVEs in the tic library and programs have been > > reported, and I would like to fix those as well, see the attached > > new > >

Re: Scheduling 9.2

On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 15:31 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 03:20:05PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:31:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire > > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > >

Re: Bug#869667: stretch-pu: package xkeyboard-config/2.19-1

On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 14:35 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Feel free to upload with the debian/files issue fixed. > Apologies for none of us having spotted this earlier, but: +xkeyboard-config (2.19-1.1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium Unstable and testing currently have 2.19-1.1, which means

Re: Bug#873479: Bug#873481: jessie-pu: package bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u13.1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 20:33 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Version fixed and uploaded. Thanks a lot. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam

Re: Bug#873479: stretch-pu: package bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u3

Control: tags -1 + pending On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:32 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 - d-i > > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 10:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > > > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 10:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wr

Re: Bug#873479: stretch-pu: package bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u3

Control: tags -1 - d-i On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 10:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 10:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > this is the next update in the series of KSK-2017 RZ KSK rollover. > > > > Only the def

Re: Bug#873481: jessie-pu: package bind9/9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u13.1

Control: tags -1 - d-i On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 12:08 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Adam, > > thanks for the quick response. > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017, at 11:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > +bind9 (1:9.9.5.dfsg-9+deb8u13.1) jessie; urgency=high > > > > Uploa

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >