Bug#755119: debian-installer: wrong numeration of dmraid device

On 17 July 2014 23:11, Dima Veselov kab...@lich.phys.spbu.ru wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i Bug was caught on preseeding Debian 7.6.0/i386, but I beleive it will work for any other installation on dmraid enabled box. In my case dmraid=true was added to kernel

Bug#755533: debian-installer: Use GeoIP support in installer

On 22 July 2014 02:35, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Patrick Häcker pa...@web.de (2014-07-21): Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Tags: d-i l10n Dear Maintainer, it would be nice, if Debian installer would support GeoIP to use default values where appropriate. See

Bug#757182: debian-installer: Please provide a warning about BTRFS

On 6 August 2014 03:46, Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: normal http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg36461.html BTRFS has some issues that can cause system lockups, filesystem deadlocks that prevent writing to disk, and other problems.

Bug#758752: Please enable building for arm64 (and armhf?)

On 24 August 2014 14:42, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 02:28:14PM -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 19:04 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2014-08-20): arm64 is a UEFI architecture, and there are some ARMv7 (i.e.)

Bug#757818: partman-lvm: Refuses to reinstall if it find old lvm volume

On 7 September 2014 07:58, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote: Control: tag 757818 + patch I've tested both '--yes' and '--wipesignatures n' in d-i now, and both work. With either, I am able to reinstall a Debian Edu profile without any problem. :) I am not quite sure which of these

Bug#699434: grub-installer: support for Intel Matrix Raid

On 18 December 2013 15:14, Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu...@debian.org wrote: On 02/12/13 10:59, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: Hello Miquel, On 31 January 2013 12:40, Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu...@debian.org wrote: This is by far the most intrusive patch - all the others are trivial.

Bug#732551: make --foreign / qemu-user-static easier

On 19 December 2013 11:21, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 13:08 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.55 Severity: wishlist If debootstrap installed qemu-user-static into the chroot when --foreign was used That would get you the foreign

Re: archdetect guessing on arm* != armel

On 3 January 2014 10:03, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 04:00 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: I don't know what ads is/was but it is armel not armhf and I think for the most part we should just leave the subarch stuff as is on armel. (At least for now

Re: UEFI corner case we don't handle yet - dual-boot with non-UEFI Windows

On 11 February 2014 01:01, Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com wrote: Gah... Just ended up playing with Colin's thinkpad; he'd reported problems with installation that sounded odd. Worked through it, and found a hole in what we recognise and support during installation (and maybe later). We

Bug#666974: installs to /dev/sda when grub-installer/bootdev = /dev/sdb

On 19 February 2014 20:02, Guilhem Moulin guil...@guilhem.org wrote: Package: grub-installer Version: 1.85 Followup-For: Bug #666974 Tags: patch Dear Maintainer, The bug is still present in Wheezy's installer. The enclosed (naive) patch makes sure grub-installer jumps to state 2 (hence

Bug#740397: busybox: please add support for parallel building

On 1 March 2014 03:01, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk (2014-03-01): On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 03:17 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: - $(MAKE) -C ${DIR} install docs/busybox.1 \ + $(MAKE) -j$(NUMJOBS) -C ${DIR} install docs/busybox.1 \ If

Bug#740271: d-i fails to purge LVM despite preseeding

On 2 March 2014 22:29, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: martin f krafft madd...@debian.org (2014-02-27): Package: debian-installer Version: 20130613+deb7u1+b2 Severity: normal Despite d-i partman-auto/purge_lvm_from_device boolean true d-i partman-lvm/device_remove_lvm boolean

Bug#721847: mkfs.btrfs -f

On 18 March 2014 20:45, Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org wrote: According mkfs.btrfs manpage the behaviour is expected: -f, --force Force overwrite when an existing filesystem is detected on the device. By default, mkfs.btrfs will not write to the device if it suspects

Re: Proposed changes to installer for armhf

On 20 April 2014 15:03, Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 12:32 +0200, K. Merker wrote: gitorious seems to have problems at the moment (trying to access the web interface gives bad gateway, running git clone gives timeouts). It does seem to be down right now :-/.

Bug#752445: partman-prep: ppc64el support

On 24 June 2014 12:06, Frederic Bonnard fre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Sorry Ben, Christian, for forgetting that. Here it is. Well, in ubuntu that was done in 27ubuntu1 upload by Colin Watson, and merged into debian with upload 29 by bubulle as off 22nd March 2014 and synced into Utopic.

Re: Packages to install be default for Stretch

On 5 May 2015 at 19:45, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: * Packages currently at important: - cron: Not needed in chroot/container environments. Hm, i'd say it's not needed full-stop. There are systemd timer units and e.g. systemd-cron that satisfy the need for periodic

Re: mdadm: diff for NMU version 3.3.2-5.1

Hello, On 28 October 2015 at 12:41, wrote: > Control: tags 784070 + patch > > Dear maintainer, > > I'm about to prepare an NMU for mdadm (versioned as 3.3.2-5.1). The diff is > attached to this message. Let me know if you want me to upload it. > I agree. there

Re: Bug#784070: is it maybe possible to settle dislikings and fix this bug?

On 27 October 2015 at 15:42, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:30 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> 27.10.2015 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> > On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> > > I'm not maintaining mdadm anymore. >> > >> > Then why

Bug#808041: s390-zfcp: Install Debian on FC-attached SCSI devices on s390

Hi! On 15 December 2015 at 17:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi! > > Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-15): >> Package: d-i.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> Tags: d-i >> >> Dear Debian Installer Team and Maintainers, >> >> I would like to contribute a new

Bug#570812: live-installer: support netboot

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:39:47 + Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:55:45 +0100 Daniel Baumann <dan...@debian.org> wrote: > > Package: live-installer > > > > currently, only installation from cdrom or hd-med

Bug#570812: live-installer: support netboot

Hi, On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:55:45 +0100 Daniel Baumann wrote: > Package: live-installer > > currently, only installation from cdrom or hd-media is working. > > it would be nice to support netboot too. the problem is that during > netboot, one will need to access the

Bug#825931: [PATCH] Skip s390-netdevice module, if there are no qeth/ctc devices to configure which is the case in modern KVM based installation, as well as LPAR and z/VM with PCI network cards. Close

lation, as well +as LPAR and z/VM with PCI network cards. Closes: #825931 + + -- Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:53:34 +0100 + s390-netdevice (0.0.44) unstable; urgency=medium [ Updated translations ] diff --git a/netdevice.c b/netdevice.c index c886170

Bug#433568: add vlan support

Hello, On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:10:51 +0800 YunQiang Su wrote: > Thanks for Zhengpeng Hou, who points out that I leave a piece of code which is > not used anymore in this patch. This piece of code make a more malloc while > not > free. > > And I refresh this patch with the

Bug#816600: postinst: IPv6 address is not displayed in 'Start SSH' invitation

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Hendrik Brueckner wrote: > Package: network-console > Version: 1.53 > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > in IPv6-only environments, the "Start SSH" invitation does not include > the IPv6 address to log in to

Bug#433568: [PATCH 1/3] Add vlan support.

5,9 @@ netcfg (1.138) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * static: trim user-specified values for IP and other addresses * Closes: #818611, LP: #1541955 + [ YunQiang Su ] + * Add vlan support. Closes: #433568 + [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] * dhcp.c: check return result of two more fgets calls

Bug#433568: [PATCH 3/3] Queue installation of vlan package, at the end of vlan activation

FTBFS * Impove vlan support, by not relying on '.' to detect and write out vlan raw device stanza + * Queue installation of vlan package, at the end of vlan activation -- Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:13:56 +0100 diff --git a/vlan.c b/vlan.c index a

Bug#433568: [PATCH 2/3] Impove vlan support, by not relying on '.' to detect and write out vlan raw device stanza

on '.' to detect and write out +vlan raw device stanza -- Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:13:56 +0100 diff --git a/netcfg-common.c b/netcfg-common.c index c6d1d8d..8d69b5e 100644 --- a/netcfg-common.c +++ b/netcfg-common.c @@ -1564,6 +1564,7 @

Bug#433568: [PATCH] Add vlan support, based on YunQiang Su patch and Phillip Kern's rewrite, with own additions. Closes: #433568

c2dae40 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +netcfg (1.139) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Add vlan support, based on YunQiang Su patch and Phillip Kern's +rewrite, with own additions. Closes: #433568 + + -- Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Mo

Bug#433568: add vlan support

Hi, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:49:57 +0100 Tom H wrote: > You don't need vlan; iproute2's ip can do it: > > ip link add link eth0 name vlan9 type vlan id 9 > or > ip link add link eth0 name eth0.9 type vlan id 9 > > I know that. vlan package is needed for the ifupdown hooks to

Bug#816600: [PATCH] Adjust regexpes to include all ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, list all ip addresses (sans loopback) in the template instructions, and use only the first ip address in the example command

/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +network-console (1.54) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + [ Dimitri John Ledkov ] + * Adjust regexpes to include all ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, list all ip +addresses (sans loopback) in the template instructions, and use only +the first ip address

d-i network configuration for VLAN, new templates review

Hello, To fix https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433568 I have been working on a patch to netcfg and it introduces a few new questions. These are medium priority questions, and I bet most people will be pre-seeding netcfg/vlan_id. VLAN is a way to tag packets on a network

Bug#433568: [PATCH] Add vlan support, based on YunQiang Su patch and Philipp Kern's rewrite, with own additions. Closes: #433568

h and Philipp Kern's +rewrite, with own additions. Closes: #433568 + + -- Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:18:08 +0100 + netcfg (1.138) unstable; urgency=medium [ Hendrik Brueckner ] diff --git a/debian/netcfg-common.templates b/debian/netcfg-common.templa

Bug#833737: tasksel: s390x should be a server architecture

Package: tasksel Version: 3.35 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Please mark s390x as an unlikely desktop architecture, and thus a server one. s390 port is already marked as such. >From a152f5a7810f8d618cd6a4289d386fda0a4dc223 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubun

Bug#825931: s390-netdevice virtio interface choice misleading

On 23 October 2016 at 22:57, Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/31/2016 09:01 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> I find logic in s390-netdevice. The priority of many questions is too >> high, thus e.g. if one uses qeth port 0, one has to explicitely &

Bug#844713: ITP: partman-swapfile -- add support for creating swapfiles

Package: wnpp Owner: Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Severity: wishlist * Package name: partman-swapfile Version : 1 Upstream Author : d-i team * URL or Web page : d-i * License : GPL Description : add support for creating swapfiles I am working on mini

Bug#840230: When installing to rootfs on LVM, an empty subvol= is appended to rootflags

I think I did fix this before http://launchpadlibrarian.net/251885735/zipl-installer_0.0.33ubuntu1_0.0.33ubuntu2.diff.gz I guess it did not make over to debian. Will fix soon. Regards, Dimitri. On 9 October 2016 at 19:34, Philipp Kern wrote: > Package: zipl-installer

Bug#850832: netcfg: Do not display blank wifi option in netcfg

SIGNATURE- >From 309bcd9bbb1ef3d47fcef01a607b7f5074bf18ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:51:43 + Subject: [PATCH] Do now show an empty option 4 when using netcfg, without a wifi-card, and when automatic configuration fail

Bug#850689: netcfg: Interface descriptions are "unknown" for systemd-udevd stable interface names

/6D4ZhyjHYxQ6Tt0Tm311LV/XzmMyosFd5wYighhLzJ3AvCBc8vI2ABvQyuE= =iOGi -END PGP SIGNATURE- >From aa7f987c20370c879f4371c98ab8e814d34a1a5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@ubuntu.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 12:44:57 + Subject: [PATCH] Also use short stable systemd-u

Re: Let's talk about conflicts and omissions in the udeb distribution

On 12 October 2017 at 19:49, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org> (2017-10-12): >> On 2017-10-12 18:35, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> > Unpacking libkmod2-udeb (24-1) ... >> > dpkg: warning: overridi

Bug#900993: s390-netdevice: lacks an upstream-like license or copying file

Package: s390-netdevice Version: 0.0.60 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, s390-netdevice is a d-i/Debian upstream package. netdevice.c and the top-level directory lack any copyright statements and a licensing file. It would be nice if the C file had the boilerplate copyright holder and

Re: Bug#886968: btrfs-progs-udeb: depends on non-udeb: libzstd1

On 15 January 2018 at 00:27, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Cyril Brulebois (2018-01-12): >> Your package is no longer installable (along with its rev-dep >> partman-btrfs) because it now depends on libzstd1, which isn't >> a udeb. > > It seems zstd is only an

Re: Bug#886968: btrfs-progs-udeb: depends on non-udeb: libzstd1

On 18 April 2018 at 00:30, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> (2018-04-17): >> First, I apologize for not responding to this email earlier, as I have >> missed it in my mailbox. > > It's a mail from

Re: Bug#886968: btrfs-progs-udeb: depends on non-udeb: libzstd1

On 18 April 2018 at 08:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 18/04/18 01:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> That's another perfect example why udeb additions should get reviewed: >> we would have noticed another buggy package, and its bugginess might not >> have been copied over to

Re: Bug#886968: btrfs-progs-udeb: depends on non-udeb: libzstd1

On 17 April 2018 at 19:01, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> (2018-01-15): >> On 15 January 2018 at 00:27, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Cyril Brulebois <k...@

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#908834: please build zstd udeb so that btrfs-progs can use zstd in Debian Installer

is o On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 12:23, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > On 09/14/2018 08:04 PM, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Package: zstd > > Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Dear Debian Med Packaging Team, > > > > Would you please build a zstd udeb so that btrfs-progs can use zstd

Re: Bug#908834: please build libzstd udeb so that btrfs-progs can use zstd in Debian Installer

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 at 15:54, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Hi Alex, Cyril, Dimitri, and anyone else reading this, > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:41:18PM +0100, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > > > Hi Nicholas, it is in the new queue: > > > >

Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#926315: openssl: wget https://google.com fails in d-i

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 22:57, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:23:19PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > 1726 write(2, "Disabling SSL due to encountered errors.\n", 41) = 41 > > Looking at the source, about the only reason I can see to get that > is that SSL_CTX_new() failed.

Bug#930454: os-prober: Please add 20microsoft efi/20microsoft probing on arm64

Package: os-prober Version: 1.77 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, There are ARM64 laptops that ship with Windows 10. It is possible to install Linux on these, as a dual boot option. Please detect Windows 10 on arm64 platform just like it is done on x86 & x86/efi. I've copied over 20microsoft

Bug#996019: debootstrap: bootstrap of ubuntu impish is failing

On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 12:41:45 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.124 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > $ sudo debootstrap impish impish https://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/linux/distributions//Ubuntu/archive/ > I: impish uses zstd compression, setting

Bug#996019: debootstrap: bootstrap of ubuntu impish is failing

Hi, I've tried to reproduce this more and I have a few questions: 1) what is the version of debootstrap ? 2) do any config files divert as to which debootstrap's `functions` file is used ? 3) what settings do you have in /tmp/configfile ? I'm trying to eliminate a case where new scripts/impish

Bug#998867: debootstrap: --no-merged-usr became a no-op

There are multiple issues reported in a single bug. > This means that I cannot create a Debian chroot from Debian unstable from 10 > years ago from snapshot.debian.org without merged-/usr and thus my chroot > will behave differently as it did back then. > Please re-enable --no-merged-usr so

Bug#996019: debootstrap: bootstrap of ubuntu impish is failing

On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, 19:49 Sylvestre Ledru, wrote: > Hello > Le 20/10/2021 à 18:05, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit : > > Hi, > > I've tried to reproduce this more > > Thanks, I appreciate it! > > and I have a few questions: > > 1) what is the version of deboo

Re: debootstrap_1.0.128+nmu1 uploaded to DELAYED/1 (was: Re: debootstrap_1.0.128_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable)

Ack, will look into it On Mon, 17 Oct 2022, 10:50 Luca Boccassi, wrote: > Hi, > > I have uploaded debootstrap_1.0.128+nmu1 to DELAYED/1, as 1.0.128 added > a new autopkgtest that fails in Debian because we still don't have > /usr/sbin in the default PATH (I guess it wasn't noticed in Ubuntu >