Re: ntfsresize

2004-01-12 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Jan 12, 2004 at 11:39:44PM +0100, Thorsten Sauter wrote: * Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-12 07:15]: | Hi, | | Is there any plan for supporting NTFS resize? | | There is already parted in debian-installer component, but parted | can't handle NTFS. | | I heard

Re: 24 Mb memory installs (was: Re: debian-installer beta 2 released)

2004-01-16 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Jan 16, 2004 at 07:08:17AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Will I be able to use d-i on my notebook? It's a 486/100 with 24 MB RAM and 340 MB disk. No CD-ROM, but floppy drive and a PCMCIA ethernet card. Screen about 30 cm. Woody ran

Re: 24 Mb memory installs (was: Re: debian-installer beta 2 released)

2004-01-16 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Jan 16, 2004 at 11:45:30AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Erik Andersen wrote: And idea _where_ it fails? i.e. Did you notice if any particular application is being a memory sucking pig? Yes, anna is. She insists in installing 30-some megabytes of udebs onto a ram disk. :-( Ouch, I can

Re: ntfs resize and gtk frontends

2004-01-19 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Jan 19, 2004 at 09:24:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: Yes, it's the tool named ntfsresize that the original poster was referring to, and it's found in the ntfstools package. But is not in any way related to the libntfs library ? $ dlocate /usr/sbin/ntfsresize ntfstools:

Re: You are suspected of plunder 2100 $ from account Webmoney!

2004-01-28 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Jan 28, 2004 at 07:25:47PM +0300, support wrote: You are suspected of plunder 2100 $ from account Webmoney! It is necessary for you to contact employee FBI USA who has affairs with representation Webmoney in USA. We have the decision of a problem and further the decision of a problem in

Re: [woody,debinst] (Was: Re: [dbootstrap] `newt' and `boxes.c', `bogl' and `bowl'[, `???' and `boxeX.c'?])

2000-06-16 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Jun 17, 2000 at 12:02:51AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:44:31PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: On Sat Jun 17, 2000 at 01:29:43PM +1000, bug1 wrote: Red Hat's `libfdisk' contains a partition editor with a `newt' interface. It might be possible to port

Re: woody installation system

2000-06-19 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Jun 17, 2000 at 09:30:04PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: On Sat Jun 17, 2000 at 08:13:54PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: That last isn't something that I am going to impose on the rest of you, of course. But I would get pretty grumpy if we just continued incremental improvements

Re: [woody,debinst] Interim filesystem

2000-06-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jun 20, 2000 at 03:37:17AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote: No argument here. I think you are forgetting about something... how is partitioning going to be accomplished without user interaction. I'm not aware of any tools that can take a description of a filesystem then partition and

Re: PPPoE for base?

2000-06-12 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jun 13, 2000 at 01:02:01AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: hashao [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible to include PPPoE in the base2_2.tgz? More and more ISP provide wide band internet access throught PPPoE now. And people using PPPoE tents to install Debian through network.

Re: busybox_0.45-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2000-07-01 Thread Erik Andersen
on, 19 Jun 2000 13:26:51 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Erik Andersen wrote: I have .deb'ed busybox, but before I upload anything I was wondering... Lintian complains about missing man pages on all the a

Re: 2.2.16?

2000-07-03 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Jul 02, 2000 at 03:22:43AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: Here is what I think is happening. The kernel boots init (aka busybox). One of the first things that init does is call console_init, which in turn calls message to log the console it found. Since we have compiled busybox to be

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-05 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Jul 05, 2000 at 06:51:40PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: If our bf-utf8 will be completed, we may need to change this in order to invoke the bterm and run the dpkg-reconfigure on that. Now with this issue added on top, I almost wonder if we shouldn't have init invoke a wrapper

Bug#64500: CALL FOR HELP : debian boot floppies 2.2.15 on apus still not ok.

2000-07-06 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Jul 06, 2000 at 10:56:19AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 06:45:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Sounds like busybox mount bug, yeah. Wonder why it only hits apus?? [-snip--] Do you think you can pester andersee directly? Well, why not, what's his

Bug#68016: tftp and floppy install broken on sun4m

2000-08-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Aug 01, 2000 at 06:25:30PM +0200, Christian Meder wrote: wierd reason. Is this repeatable? If so, are you in a position to run some tests? Yep and yes. It is repeatable. I get the error when booting via tftp (tried it several times) _and_ when booting via floppies. I can run

Re: New release of boot-floppies

2000-08-14 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Aug 13, 2000 at 11:30:47PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If we don't provide the devices, we should create them online, that would be a feasable solution for me. Or alternatively we have to remove the drivers that make use of them...

Re: bf rewrite?

2000-08-19 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Aug 19, 2000 at 07:29:13PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Hi, rumours said that the entire boot-floppies system is to be rewritten for woody? While I agree that the current mass floppy requirement is a major pain with Debian, I don't believe that this would be a proper goal. We

Re: [debian-installer] microdpkg

2000-08-21 Thread Erik Andersen
'? Wouldn't just 'microdpkg' be enough? When we go to install the base system, we really just want to unpack the .debs and drop them into place. For this to take place we can do something like the following: #!/bin/sh # Lame 5 minute micro-dpkg shell script... # Erik Andersen [EMAIL

Re: [debian-installer] microdpkg

2000-08-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Aug 21, 2000 at 06:32:09PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: Maybe I'm missing something though (I almost certainly am), but do we really need a 'microdpkg-deb'? Wouldn't just 'microdpkg' be enough? When we go to install the base system, we really just want to unpack the .debs and drop

Re: [debian-installer] microdpkg

2000-08-22 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Aug 21, 2000 at 11:25:55PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: unlike dpkg, dpkg-deb can quite easily be written as a shell script. I wrote most of it as a shell script, but I cannot find a way to parse control file entries w/o using external shell commands, which is something of a no-no

Re: [debian-installer] microdpkg

2000-08-24 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Aug 23, 2000 at 11:31:42PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: I just checked something into cvs. it's in tools/udpkg This is so cool. You 'da man! -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Installing into DOS partition

2000-08-26 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Aug 26, 2000 at 07:07:29AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: - of which the second gives me an: error in loading shared library /lib/libext2fs.so.2 symbol __divdi3 version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference I've spent four days on fixing this, no

Re: [woody] udpkg progress

2000-08-26 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Aug 26, 2000 at 02:55:21PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: explore integrating busybox tools into udpkg. either udpkg pulls in busybox modules, or we just go ahead and add udpkg as another busybox utility module. Erik, comments? I'm ok with just adding it in... with debugging turned

Bug#67888: netwinder/arm port shouldn't ask about maintaining 2.0 compatability

2000-08-27 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Aug 27, 2000 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Package: boot-floppies Version: N/A Severity: wishlist The debian installer for potato worked just fine on the netwinder, one I convinced it to tftp boot the provided netwinder-rescue image. One hitch though -- the

boot floppies and 2.4.x kernels

2000-09-05 Thread Erik Andersen
It looks like my 2.4.x sysinfo patch has (finally) made it into kernel 2.4.0-test8-pre5, restoring binary compatibility with 2.2.x. This means that busybox binaries compiled under 2.2.x (i.e. the Debian boot floppies) should run now run without a problem under 2.4.x kernels = 2.4.0-test8-pre5...

Re: Installing with 2.4.0-test8 and devfs, problem with floppy

2000-09-22 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Sep 22, 2000 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: So instead of having 2 different inittabs to choose from I changed init.c to cope with it. I also changed getty to cope with it (diff is send to maintainer and upstream) for after installation. Hmm. I don't believe I have

Re: Installing with 2.4.0-test8 and devfs, problem with floppy

2000-09-22 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Sep 22, 2000 at 02:45:52PM +0200, Petr Cech wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:32:13PM +0200 , Goswin Brederlow wrote: So instead of having 2 different inittabs to choose from I changed init.c to cope with it. I also changed getty to cope with it (diff is send to maintainer and

Re: Alternative root filesystem support

2000-09-22 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Sep 22, 2000 at 04:59:19PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote: Will jfs be in 2.4.0 or where can I get some docs for it? No, jffs is in the kernel, but don't know what this is. "JFFS -- Journaling Flash File System, Linux implementation." JFFS only works on flash devices (i.e. it

Bug#72327: boot-floppies: doesn't install .bash_logout for root

2000-09-24 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Sep 24, 2000 at 03:32:14PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Josip Rodin wrote: The bash package in potato includes a nice /etc/skel/.bash_logout file: # ~/.bash_logout: executed by bash(1) when login shell exits. # when leaving the console clear the screen to increase

Re: redesigning the debian installer

2000-09-25 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Sep 25, 2000 at 12:26:07PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Martin Keegan wrote: Incidentally, what facilities currently exist for non-interactive partitioning? Is there a dedicated tool for this, or should one do /sbin/fdisk scripted_responses

Re: the next step

2000-09-30 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Sep 28, 2000 at 06:36:00PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: I feel that the design discussions have reached the point where we'll be more productive if we're talking about actual code. There are still many decisions to be made, but most of them are on the level of how an individual module

Re: the next step

2000-09-30 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Sep 30, 2000 at 12:51:22AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Erik Andersen wrote: Where do we upload things to? Can we get an archive area? I've had busybox .debs ready for months now... And I've had bug #66604 open for months too. I need to track down some of the ftp maintainers and get

Re: [woody] modules for debian-installer (Re: the next step)

2000-09-30 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Sep 30, 2000 at 01:26:49PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: I think grub would be better since it's xplatform. I have heard rumors that its not ready for prime time yet, though. I've been using it with great results on my laptop, home box, and work box. I give it two thumbs up (though

Re: the next step

2000-09-30 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Sep 30, 2000 at 06:08:39PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: Oooh, uclibc. That's a good idea. In fact, that's a VITAL idea. Joey, please remember that some architectures (I'm thinking powerpc here, and at least two more) do not support library reduction.

Re: the next step

2000-10-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Oct 01, 2000 at 02:28:06PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To be honest, I've never been given a really good explanation as to why libc reduction works in our current setup, period. I spent a while trying to make it work on powerpc and gave

Re: RFC: ITP(?) busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate packages

2000-10-10 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Oct 11, 2000 at 08:13:37AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please give me your advice if packaging busybox and mklibs.sh as seperate packages is a good idea or not. Thanks! This comes to my mind because: 1) Seems boot-floppies won't like to come into woody (c.f. Adam) 2)

Re: Unidentified subject!

2000-10-14 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Oct 13, 2000 at 11:14:14PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Talking to the release manager, Anthony Towns, in IRC, I learned it is his current plan to freeze woody early in January 2001. I think this is a laudable goal, but unfortunately I think that means we need to retain the

Re: Red Hat installer via CVS ?

2000-10-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Oct 20, 2000 at 02:21:34PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: "Erik" == Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Erik It will fit. Oh, yes. It will. ;-) Erik I'm sure it can be done. Though we may need to switch to libc5 or uclibc or Erik something more ex

Re: the next step

2000-10-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Oct 20, 2000 at 02:24:59PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: "Erik" == Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Erik At Lineo (where I work) we have a tool called "Lipo" (written in perl) that Erik does the library reduction thing, and we have it

Re: the next step

2000-10-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:48PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: Ok, cool. Do you have a patch queue for us? My mailbox. I can also give folks write access... Erik The syscall layer is in a state of flux at the moment -- starting late last Erik night I began converting from asm

Re: busybox in main

2000-10-24 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Oct 23, 2000 at 10:35:37PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: And sometimes I think that would have been easier. Sheesh. Indeed. I'm glad to see some progress finally happening though... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --This message was written using 73% post-consumer

Re: Why .udeb won't work.

2000-10-26 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Oct 26, 2000 at 01:41:06PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: So I tried to make a .udeb today from my main-menu code. It wasn't that hard; I ended up with a debian/rules like this: why not cd app-1.0 dpkg-buildpackage cd .. mv app-1.0.foo.deb app-1.0.foo.udeb -Erik -- Erik B.

Re: debian-installer main menu almost done

2000-10-28 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Oct 28, 2000 at 05:40:27PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: I'm happy to report that the main menu for the debian install seems to be almost done. I have just two items on my TODO list: * Fix the one warning at compile time. * Figure out how to handle configuring only one virtual package

Re: busybox in main

2000-10-25 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Oct 25, 2000 at 09:26:00PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Adam Di Carlo wrote: dists/ stable/ main/ binary-i386/ various .debs disks-i386/ various .udebs some basic boot-floppies

Re: newlib for installer?

2000-11-03 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Nov 03, 2000 at 11:06:19AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: Erik (and the rest of the uclibc team) have been making great progress with uclibc, it compiles busybox statically to 370KB (70KB of libraries) whereas compiled with glibc its about 650 KB I dont know how this compares to

Re: first weekly debian-installer status report

2000-11-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Nov 01, 2000 at 08:11:52PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: - busybox integration [Erik Anderson?] Not started. Busybox needs to build one or more .udebs. Probably more than one. I claim this one. (btw, it is "Andersen" not "Anderson" :-). When the new

Re: first weekly debian-installer status report

2000-11-02 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Nov 01, 2000 at 10:57:47PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: - http retreiver [UNCLAMED] Not started. Download udebs, other files from network. I claim this one as well. This will be based on busybox wget. I presume we will also need support for other types of

Re: busybox in woody (was Re: first weekly debian-installer status report)

2000-11-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Nov 12, 2000 at 03:11:53PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Once Erik uploads busybox udebs, he will also be uploading the source, and I think a regular .deb with busybox packaged for a regular system. So the boot-floppies can use either of those. Ok, so in woody we'll be using the

Re: busybox in woody (was Re: first weekly debian-installer status report)

2000-11-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Nov 13, 2000 at 10:09:47PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun Nov 12, 2000 at 03:11:53PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Will means be provided to create the requisite symlinks in /usr/bin ? I am open to suggestions on exactly what you want

Re: busybox in woody (was Re: first weekly debian-installer status report)

2000-11-14 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Nov 14, 2000 at 11:09:06AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am after all making this .deb exclusively for you for the woody boot floppies, so if you have any preferences, by all means let me know. The above seemed like an arrangement

Re: Debian Boot CVS: aph

2000-11-14 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Nov 13, 2000 at 11:02:53PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Adam Di Carlo wrote: BTW, there's something wrong with the scripts where they are saying all the changes are by me, which is wrong. I'll bet it's people committing with the pserver all come out as you, since the commits actally

Re: weekly (?) debian-installer status report

2000-11-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 05:28:44PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: - busybox integration [Erik Andersen] Not started. Busybox needs to build one or more .udebs. Probably more than one. The first pass at busybox udebs will be ready tonight. How do I upload them

Re: weekly (?) debian-installer status report

2000-11-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 08:06:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Erik Andersen wrote: On Mon Nov 20, 2000 at 05:28:44PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: - busybox integration [Erik Andersen] Not started. Busybox needs to build one or more .udebs. Probably more

Re: Anyone's building bf on a woody system?

2000-11-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Nov 21, 2000 at 10:49:43PM +0300, Michael Sobolev wrote: Subject asks it all. :) I have problems compiling dbootstrap on a woody system... These may be caused by libc stuff... In file included from losetup.c:16: /usr/include/linux/loop.h:62: #error "Wrong dev_t in loop.h" Argh.

Re: Anyone's building bf on a woody system?

2000-11-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Nov 22, 2000 at 01:00:38AM +0300, Michael Sobolev wrote: On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 02:11:38PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: On Tue Nov 21, 2000 at 10:49:43PM +0300, Michael Sobolev wrote: Subject asks it all. :) I have problems compiling dbootstrap on a woody system... These may

Re: [debian-installer] anyone interested in an irc meeting?

2000-11-29 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Nov 28, 2000 at 07:34:19PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: In reference to a message from Randolph Chung, dated Nov 27: I was wondering if anyone is interested in arranging a time to hold a debian-installer design brainstorming session or such on irc (#debian-boot on irc.debian.org).

busybox for debian-installer

2000-12-01 Thread Erik Andersen
I have created a new busybox package and .udeb for the woody debian-installer. This is a preliminary version -- I have no idea if I have the right set of apps for the installer compiled in or not. I believe this is the most complex .udeb creating package anyone has made so far (since it creates

Re: busybox in woody (was Re: first weekly debian-installer status report)

2000-12-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Nov 14, 2000 at 03:12:27PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Well, I already have an install.sh script. If I provide the busybox.links file that is generated at compile time then this would work just fine. Then I could simply install /bin/busybox and /usr/bin/install_busybox.sh and

Re: busybox in woody (was Re: first weekly debian-installer status report)

2000-12-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 01, 2000 at 07:25:15PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Erik Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that I have a first pass at the woody debian-installer busybox package out there, I now need to make another package to satisfy the woody boot-floppies. Well, there might be other

Re: weekly debian-installer progress report

2000-12-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 01, 2000 at 04:34:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: - busybox integration [Erik Andersen] First pass busybox udeb is ready. http://people.debian.org/~andersee/ Still needs a final tally of the needed apps, but should be usable... - http

Re: [VA-Debian] Comments from a first-time Debian install.....

2000-12-03 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Dec 03, 2000 at 11:09:05AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: client. (No, I didn't realize that pump was installed by default, or I would have used it, despite the fact that it violates the DHCP RFC's. Why anyone would want to use pump is beyond me. I guess it is simple. But

Re: busybox wget

2000-12-07 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Dec 06, 2000 at 04:43:38PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: So I'm looking at busybox wget, with an eye to using it as the core of the http retreiver. Observations: * The chunked transfer encoding thing is a killer. Seems to break it on a pretty large number of web sites. I guess you know

Re: Debian Boot CVS: joeyh

2000-12-07 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Dec 07, 2000 at 01:02:26PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Log message: busybox breaks udpkg An update to that, I thought the busybox .udeb was breaking udpkg, but it was actually that udpkg does not work with busybox ar, which was in my path. Oh? Details? -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen

Re: Debian Boot CVS: joeyh

2000-12-07 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 08, 2000 at 09:27:46AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: Specifically a version, as far as i know the ar in cvs works with debs, but i think there was a problem a few months back. The .udeb joeyh is using was built by me from the busybox CVS last week... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen

Re: debian-installer demo system, take 2

2000-12-08 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 08, 2000 at 03:28:51PM +0800, ha shao wrote: Maybe let the user choose continent first and then countries. Such a big list really make a user pulse for a big while. This is a very good idea. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --This message was written using

Re: debian-installer demo system, take 2a

2000-12-08 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 08, 2000 at 09:51:47PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: In reference to a message from Joey Hess, dated Dec 07: Here is another debian-installer demo system. It still needs a real debian system and doesn't chroot, nor does it even use cdebconf although it probably could. But it is

Re: debian-installer demo system, take 2a

2000-12-09 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 08, 2000 at 10:30:30PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Randolph Chung wrote: In reference to a message from Joey Hess, dated Dec 07: Here is another debian-installer demo system. It still needs a real debian system and doesn't chroot, nor does it even use cdebconf although it

Re: busybox wget

2000-12-09 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Dec 07, 2000 at 06:22:21PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: On Thu Dec 07, 2000 at 10:05:32AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Eep yes! Can you make a new udeb out of cvs? I will tonight. Right now I'm spending some time working on wget (there is now an initial bit of proxy support

Re: Debian Boot CVS: joeyh

2000-12-12 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Dec 12, 2000 at 06:48:05PM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote: CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot Module name: debian-installer Changes by: joeyh 00/12/12 18:48:05 Modified files: retriever/wget : wget-retriever.c Log message: enabled wget continuation support. I hope

Re: Debian Boot CVS: joeyh

2000-12-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Dec 12, 2000 at 07:01:15PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Erik Andersen wrote: With the latest and greatest busybox wget, I make the assumption that if the file already exists on disk then the intention is to continue downloading a previously aborted download... So you really shouldn't

Re: time to upload udebs!

2000-12-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Dec 13, 2000 at 12:20:46PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: On Tue Dec 12, 2000 at 05:02:53PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: James just announced that package pools are fully rolled out. This means that there is (untested) udeb support in the archive now, and we can start uploading udebs. I

Re: time to upload udebs!

2000-12-14 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Dec 13, 2000 at 06:28:12PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: Any prefered naming scheme in use then? busybox-udeb.*.udeb? Well that mirrors what tausq did with cdebconf anyway. which i copied from busybox cvs :-) Thats what I get for doubting myself then... :-) I looked at

Re: compile error with Wrong dev_t in loop.h

2000-12-18 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Dec 17, 2000 at 03:55:43PM +0800, ha shao wrote: I got the following error when 'make release' on boot floopy cvs: . gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -D_GNU_SOURCE -DBB_VER='"0.43"' -DBB_BT='"2000.12.17-07:45+"' -c -o mount.o mount.c In file included from

Re: crypt

2000-12-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Dec 21, 2000 at 09:42:30AM -0800, Taheri, Babak wrote: I would like to know what is the equivalent command for the UNIX crypt command in Debian X86 Linux? In Debian there is no crypt command. There is a crypt(3) libc interface though. If you want to crypt something, you can use perl

Re: new demo system -- chrooted!

2000-12-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Dec 21, 2000 at 02:16:11PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: The 160k being used by busybox is also too much I was sortof liberal with enabling apps so far, just because I had no idea what would be needed. If you see anything in the busybox.udeb that looks like a candidate for the chopping

Re: new demo system -- chrooted!

2000-12-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Dec 21, 2000 at 04:22:03PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: On Thu Dec 21, 2000 at 03:08:45PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Here's a list of what we need by inspection: - main-menu: nothing - anna: nothing * - wget-retreiver: wget * - udpkg: ar, zcat, tar, rm * - cdebconf: nothing

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2000-12-30 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Dec 30, 2000 at 01:48:00PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody. I think it can be done by Feb. I don't think there many major issues. Here's the one's I know of: - use

Re: demo3a (network configuration working)

2000-12-31 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 29, 2000 at 12:56:36AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: Known Problems: -proc filesystem isn't working, so I can't find the network interfaces automatically. Hmm. And doing a 'mount proc /proc -t proc' doesn't mount it? How odd. -netkit-tiny's ifconfig didn't work for me, so I

Re: ppp/dhcp into cvs?

2000-12-31 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Dec 29, 2000 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: -wouldn't it be nice to have all the componants that will potentially be on that magical single floppy in one place? No. This isn't BSD! Actually, they already are effectivly in one place... apt-get source foo -Erik

Re: demo3a (network configuration working)

2000-12-31 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Dec 31, 2000 at 12:52:04PM -0800, David Whedon wrote: you the traditional 'ifconfig' type network status info that most folks have come to know and love. So, with that in mind, what specifically didn't work for you? That was all, I didn't see the output that I know and love, so

Re: Reiserfs boot floppies for Debian?

2001-01-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Jan 01, 2001 at 04:18:15AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: I mounted the 127Mb partition as /, and the 64Mb one as /boot. I don't understand the rationale for installing a partition as /boot. I always thought /boot had to be on the root partition? Isn't that true, since it has the

Re: Reiserfs boot floppies for Debian?

2001-01-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Jan 01, 2001 at 12:50:52PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: But just because lilo and grub handle large hard drives doesn't mean that a separate /boot partition has no place in the world. For example, on my NetWinder, /boot is a small partition formatted to use old 2.0.x compatible

Re: ReiserFS boot floppies for Potato

2001-01-01 Thread Erik Andersen
On Mon Jan 01, 2001 at 07:34:35PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: applogies to Gordon Matzigkeit [EMAIL PROTECTED], the official grub maintainer. i had to change some of the source code in the grub-install script to get around some busybox's shortcomings. bug reports against busybox will

Replacing ae

2001-01-02 Thread Erik Andersen
Having carefully looked over nano-tiny ('apt-get install nano-tiny' for the curious) I propose we immediately throw ae out of the boot-floppies and use nano-tiny instead. It is already linked vs slang so there are no library problems. It _is slightly_ bigger. On x86 it adds 16k. That is a

Re: proxy support for wget retriever

2001-01-02 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 02, 2001 at 11:00:49AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Joey Hess | Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | | I think the patch is pretty self-explanatory. It adds proxy support | for wget, and additionally, it _requires_ the user to input hostname | and directory. | | Could

Re: proxy support for wget retriever

2001-01-02 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 02, 2001 at 12:16:57PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | If you can show me where it should give an error, I'll | add it right in... Imho, it should require to get a hostname, and a directory. My Hmm. I'm not sure I understand. Assuming you are talking about the URL wget is

Bug#81084: boot-floppies: busybox's grep fail's to parse a legal regular expression properly

2001-01-02 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 02, 2001 at 12:38:11PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:44:36PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: certain RE's will fail to be matched. this is not an exhaustive list, and i was unable to find a test suite to test all sorts of RE's. This problem appears to be

Re: netkit-tiny-udeb

2001-01-04 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Jan 03, 2001 at 11:25:21PM -0800, David Whedon wrote: Hi Erik, I debianized netkit-tiny. The way that I made a reduced feature udeb isn't terribly pretty, perhaps you can think of a better way. I toyed with the idea of using autoconf and a bunch of --[dis|e]nable's, but that may

Re: netkit-tiny package

2001-01-04 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Jan 03, 2001 at 07:43:03PM -0800, David Whedon wrote: I'm packaging netkit-tiny. I'll make a deb and a udeb for debian-installer. I plan on putting in the udeb: ifconfig, ping, and nc. What's the future plan on this as far as integration with busy box (or not)? From the busybox TODO

Re: woody boot floppies

2001-01-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 09, 2001 at 11:31:45AM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: true. if the reiserfs partition is mounted w/o the nottail option, then LILO notices holes in the map file. (other partition types may also benefit, such as qmail mail queue partitions). my current disks notice this and ask

Re: Debian Boot CVS: joeyh

2001-01-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Jan 11, 2001 at 06:06:58PM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote: CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot Module name: boot-floppies Changes by: joeyh 01/01/11 18:06:58 Modified files: scripts/rootdisk: mklibs.sh Log message: argh. I just upgraded, and the name of libc.so* has

Re: reduced d-i demo3

2001-01-13 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Jan 11, 2001 at 01:12:00PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Joey Hess wrote: Unfortunatly, while the libraries get reduced, ash doesn't work (busybox does). root@gumdrop:/home/joey/tmp/demo3chroot . bin/sh bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: bin/sh: symbol sys_siglist, version

Re: reduced d-i demo3

2001-01-16 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sat Jan 13, 2001 at 01:28:10PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: I still haven't really ruled out uclibc BTW, but we seem to be doing fine on size as-is. I realise that uClibc is probably not going to be needed or used, but mostly for the FYI department, I thought you might be interested.

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-19 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Jan 12, 2001 at 07:04:07PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What's our time frame here? I need to verify that 2.2.18 fixes the current PowerPC installation brown bag. I dunno. I'd like to get it all taken care of by end of month, does

Re: finer grained udeb's?

2001-01-19 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Jan 19, 2001 at 04:17:43PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: Glenn McGrath wrote: While working on support for dhclient in debian-installer I noticed that busybox will need to have 'expr' added. I wonder how this should be handled. I guess it makes sense to add 'expr' since it is only a

Re: netkit-tiny

2001-01-20 Thread Erik Andersen
On Fri Jan 19, 2001 at 03:20:27PM -0800, David Whedon wrote: I would be glad to have you maintain it -- Okay, I'll take it. BTW, earlier today I dropped busybox wget into its rightful place in netkit-tiny. wget is now disabled in the release of busybox I'm about to upload to incoming, so

Re: cdebconf-udeb uploaded; notes about using with joey's build system

2001-01-21 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Jan 21, 2001 at 07:16:53PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: System stats Installed udebs: anna main-menu cdebconf-udeb udpkg busybox-udeb ash-udeb choose-mirror wget-retriever BTW, with the new version of busybox-udeb I uploaded yesterday, we now need to add in netkit-tiny, since

Re: daily builds

2001-01-22 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 23, 2001 at 02:11:30PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: Im going to try and get a mount package that integrates with main menu, ive just got to hook together some device, partition and filesystem selecting code. Once we have mount working we can try and make it standalone by

Re: daily builds

2001-01-23 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 23, 2001 at 04:10:42PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: Like, if we put all the core stuff (busybox, main menu, cdebconf, etc) into an initrd we could then either chroot to a new filesystem, or mount another partition to get more space. This is called "pivot root", and requires

Re: daily builds

2001-01-23 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 23, 2001 at 08:49:19AM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: On Tue Jan 23, 2001 at 04:10:42PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote: Like, if we put all the core stuff (busybox, main menu, cdebconf, etc) into an initrd we could then either chroot to a new filesystem, or mount another partition

Re: using GRUB

2001-01-23 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Jan 23, 2001 at 08:49:04PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: I guess that CD-Rom drive could be anywhere from (hd1) to (hd3). Uh, well, you mean hda to hdc? Plus SCSI drives, etc etc. Oh, ick. There must be a better way. I did a similar thing once. I used a simple shell script on

  1   2   3   4   >