r your time and helpfulness.
Bye!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpZtfYrt9Y0O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
aboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp9WUY012l1S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rogress on this?
Please fix this issue.
Thanks for your time!
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
p
On Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:42:34 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:54:01PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > Dear console-setup maintainers, this bug has been reported quite some
> > time ago: is there any progress on this?
>
> In order to be
ere's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp92OeHMYhTv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:19:41 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just my +1
>
> Francesco Poli, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 19:00:30 +0100, wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Anyway, the things will work even without such checks, so maybe your
> > > proposed solution can be used unch
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:19:16 +0300 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 06:37:18PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:22:46 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > Dear console-setup package maintainers,
> > is there anything blocking th
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:22:46 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> In conclusion, it really appears to be the solution to be adopted in
> order to fix this issue: once again, please consider adding such file
> as /lib/udev/rules.d/90-setupcon.rules to package console-setup.
[...]
Dea
, consistently with the rest of partman?
Could you please clarify?
Thanks in advance.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:32:00 +0200 Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 03:29:23PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I am not completely sure I understand what direction was taken to fix
the bug: does partman-lvm use decimal (i.e.: SI) multiples everywhere
*now*, on both input
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:50:38 +0200 Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
Today, I booted up the notebook and logged in on the console
(I do not use any graphical login manager) and noticed that
the keyboard layout was set to US, while my notebook has an
Italian keyboard
[...]
Please help!
I
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:43:29 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:50:38PM +0200, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
Despite XKBLAYOUT is clearly set to it, I still get a US keyboard
map on the console (X is fine, instead).
I am unable to reproduce this.
Ouch! :-(
Can
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:42:02 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:26:52AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
If you are able to suggest better fonts, please do not hesitate to do
so!
First you need to install console-setup. Console-setup-mini supports
limited set
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:03:37 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I will try and perform some more tests tomorrow...
Let's *really* restart from scratch:
# aptitude -t unstable install console-setup console-setup-mini-
This installed console-setup/1.46 and console-terminus/4.28-2, while
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:16:22 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Hello!
I really appreciate you efforts to report everything relevant in the bug
tracking system.
I am glad you find my efforts useful! :-)
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:03:37AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
I got the following
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:56:59 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't know why the fonts in console-setup didn't work for you (as I
don't use toilet)
It should be easy to see for yourself: I suggest you to install toilet
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:32:25 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:47:41AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
Where can I find a list of the symbols that the fonts in console-setup
need to support?
As far as the toilet future font is concerned, you may wish to take
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:19:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 05:35:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli (t1000) wrote:
[...]
If I switch back to the console (by pressing [Ctrl+Alt+F1]) and I login
again, then the output of
$ toilet -f future hello
[...]
looks different
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:02:53 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:08:12PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
No, I cannot: this command belongs to the kbd package, but I do not
have this package installed on any of the Debian boxes I use.
Should I switch from console
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I had tried with 'showcfont', but I thought it didn't do what you
wanted. Instead of telling me the name of the used font (as I
expected), it wrote a complete
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 23:49:36 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:45:35 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:01:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I suppose that only the horizontal lines are broken (the vertical
are OK)?
Bingo!
You
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:07:55 +0200 Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 06:40:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
Hence, it seems that this bug should be fixed in
xserver-xorg-video-intel. If this is the case, I think the bug report
should be reassigned to package xserver
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Section 1.1 _What is Debian_[1] states, in part:
| Debian is an all-volunteer organization dedicated to developing free
| software and promoting the ideals of the Free Software Foundation.
I'd say that Debian promotes (or
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: minor
Hi!
Section 1.2 _What is GNU/Linux?_[1] states, in part:
| Development of what later became GNU/Linux began in 1984, when the
| _Free Software Foundation_ began development of a free Unix-like
| operating system called GNU.
|
| The
Package: installation-guide
Version: 20070122
Severity: normal
Hi!
Section 6.3.2.1. _Partitioning Your Disks_[1] states:
| If you choose guided partitioning using (encrypted) LVM, the installer
| will also create a separate /boot partition. The other partitions,
| except for the swap partition,
Package: partman-auto-lvm
Version: 18
Severity: normal
Hi!
I'm trying to configure an LVM partitioning in a virgin disk on a brand new
machine.
I'm using the CD labeled as:
Debian GNU/Linux testing Etch - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST
Binary-1 20070218-08:47
that is to say
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:04:02 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 411586 partman-lvm
severity 411586 minor
thanks
I think you forgot to Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 00:44, Francesco Poli wrote:
I cannot understand what's wrong.
Does the confirmation message mean
Package: partman-lvm
Version: 50
Severity: important
Hi!
I'm again trying to configure an LVM partitioning in a virgin disk on the
same brand new machine, as described in bug#411586.
I'm using the CD labeled as:
Debian GNU/Linux testing Etch - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST
Binary-1
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:51:58 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
I set the severity of this bug to important bug, since it has a
major effect on the usability of a package, but I strongly believe
that etch debian-installer should
?
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpVnjVgGQmeu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:28:48 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 21:55, Francesco Poli wrote:
I see the FSF and GNU links fixed (and that's OK), but I still see
the seemingly off-topic link to http://www.li.org/linuxhistory.php .
Thanks for reminding. I missed that.
You're
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
It's not clear to me how to get the source for the Debian Installation
Guide.
At the Debian Documentation Project page[1], there's a Subversion
command line that will probably checkout the latest development
version (right?). This seems
reopen 40123 !
thanks
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 11:05:22 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 December 2006 00:59, Francesco Poli wrote:
It's not clear to me how to get the source for the Debian
Installation Guide.
For the Sarge version: apt-get source debian-installer
For the Etch version
reopen 401233 !
thanks
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:50:02 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
reopen 40123 !
^^^
thanks
[...]
Let's see if this time I manage to reopen the right bug! :-/
I hope I didn't reopen a very old bug by mistake:
http://bugs.debian.org/40123 gives the following error
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 16:35:33 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:50, Francesco Poli wrote:
The problem is: figuring out where to get the source by looking at
the webpage[1] is not made easy. In that page[1] there are links
for a great number of compiled versions
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:02:55 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 02 December 2006 18:27, Francesco Poli wrote:
I'm talking about the published stable version of the manual: it's
been the same exact version since June 2005 so far (or am I wrong?).
Yes, you are wrong.
Could you be a little
Package: installation-report
Severity: wishlist
Boot method: multi-arch netinst CD (as of 2006-12-28)
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/multi-arch/iso-cd/debian-testing-MULTI-NETINST-1.iso
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:50:33 +0100
Machine: assembled box
CPU:
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:11:36 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 00:30, Francesco Poli wrote:
Comments/Problems:
No problems AFAICS.
Note that I tested the guided partitioning of the entire disk with
encrypted LVM (choosing to separate /home): it seems to work fine.
I
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:39:21 +0100 Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 17:16, Francesco Poli wrote:
But nothing asked me whether the hardware clock was in local time or
UTC!
It was silently assumed to be UTC, which, BTW, was I what I wanted
it to be, but forgot to set
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:17:55 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
After booting the installed system, I noticed that the /etc/fstab
needed to be fixed by hand.
[...]
I forgot to mention that this bug looks similar to #609716, but it is
not exactly the same...
I experienced #609716
Package: console-setup-mini
Version: 1.44
Severity: important
Hi!
I upgraded my Debian testing (squeeze) notebook yesterday and various
packages were upgraded (among which several xorg packages).
Due to dependencies, console-setup-mini was pulled in, as confirmed
by /var/log/aptitude :
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.50
Severity: normal
Hi and thanks for maintaining console-setup!
On a box where console-setup-mini was installed, I issued the following
command:
# aptitude install console-setup console-setup-mini-
in order to switch from console-setup-mini to
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.50
Severity: normal
Hi (again)!
During the discussions for bug #546983, console-setup was greatly
improved by Anton Zinoviev (which I would like to thank again):
the console is now able to display 'toilet -f future' symbols in a
strange, yet charming way, by
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Hello,
I would like to report a successful (well, let's say almost successful)
installation, with a single little issue in the auto-generated /etc/fstab
file.
The issue may be easily fixed by hand, but, still, I think it's caused
by a bug:
44 matches
Mail list logo
