26.04.2024 13:24, Frédéric Guyot wrote:
After looking at this a bit more closely , it seems that netcfg is calling
udhcpc with limited set options. see here:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/netcfg/-/blob/master/dhcp.c#L38
Ok,
I'm removing whole modutils from busybox udeb (besides depmod, this is
lsmod, insmod, rmmod, and modprobe). All these are provided by
kmod-udeb as far as I can see (as symlinks to kod).
--
GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24.
New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E
09.04.2024 16:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Marco d'Itri (2024-04-09):
Yes. Nowadays kmod has many more features related to compressed modules
and verification of signatures.
Can we agree that kmod should provide these programs for d-i?
Or can the d-i maintainers just tell us what they want?
I
05.03.2024 03:36, Steven Shiau :
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.134
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
As mentioned here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065394#28
For the moment on Mar/5/2024 in the Debian Sid repository, libuuid1 "Provides:
libuuid1t64 (= 2.39.3-9)",
09.02.2024 17:57, Thorsten Bonow :
dash << 'EOF' [15:28:53]
if $( (true) 2>/dev/null); then
echo "42"
fi
EOF
42
which only works in dash because of the added space between the command
substitution $(...) and the subshell (...).
Does dash think it
09.02.2024 16:58, ca...@allfreemail.net
Package: console-setup
Followup-For: Bug #1063518
Consider making all scripts provided by console-setup shellcheck-clean, there
are lots of tiny issues that can turn into big issues under the right
conditions.
Please do not do this. Shellcheck is a
06.01.2024 11:40, Helmut Grohne:
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:01:12AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I also recommend to establish QA for all udebs to automatically detect,
report and address such conflicts as they evidently cause undefined
behaviour otherwise. That can be as simple as collecting
Hi!
There's a debian-specific patch in busybox since 2017 which adds ability
to lift variable name filtering rules for d-i. A comment in there says:
This is not a long term fix for this problem: a different approach is
needed to parse the values from the kernel command-line, but we
24.12.2023 11:16, Cyril Brulebois :
...
Searching for information about fuse and virtio, I finally noticed this
entry, which probably explains both fuse's “going away” and ditto for
some (but not all) virtio modules:
* Set CONFIG_VIRTIO_FS and its dependencies to builtin, to allow building
24.11.2023 02:27, Helmut Grohne:
Package: udhcpc
Version: 1:1.36.1-6~exp.1
Severity: normal
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: dep17p7
Hi Chris,
thanks for sitting down with me and doing this /usr-move. We aimed to be
careful and upload to experimental. Now dumat doesn't like your upload.
I'm
14.11.2023 14:56, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:42:09 +0300 Michael Tokarev
wrote:
..
With just dh_installsystemd --no-enable, it is still started.
With dh_installsystemd --no-enable --no-start, it is started
as well, - apparently because initscript is started. Also
Control: tag -1 + help
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 23:20:24 +0100 bl...@debian.org wrote:
Package: busybox
Severity: important
User: bl...@debian.org
Usertags: missing-systemd-service
Dear Maintainer(s),
busybox has been flagged by Lintian as shipping a sysv-init script
without a corresponding
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 17:25:50 + Sabahattin Gucukoglu
wrote:
Source: busybox
Version: 1:1.22.0-19
Severity: wishlist
The dumpleases utility would be made more useful on a system with an SSD if
FEATURE_UDHCPD_WRITE_LEASES_EARLY were set at build time, because then you
wouldn't need to set
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Sun, 21 May 2023 04:11:09 +0200 Ben Hutchings wrote:
Package: udhcpc
Version: 1:1.35.0-4+b2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: ipv6
Busybox has a DHCPv6 client (udhcpc6) but this is not included
in the Debian packages.
Please enable CONFIG_UDHCPC6 and the dependent
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:25:09 + Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
Package: udhcpd
Version: 1:1.30.1-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: ru...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: runscript
Curious - Why are you filing this against udhcpd only,
why not to do it for other packages too?
Also, how runit
Hi everyone!
Somehow I missed this whole issue, - I didn't see it until now.
Will adjust my mail filters.
08.08.2023 00:49, Philip Hands wrote:
Steve McIntyre writes:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:15:57AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Michael,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-06-28):
Control:
15.06.2023 15:25, Michael Biebl wrote:
# Log anything besides private authentication messages to a single log file
#
*.*;auth,authpriv.none -/var/log/syslog
#
# Log commonly used facilities to their own log file
#
auth,authpriv.* /var/log/auth.log
cron.*
15.06.2023 15:25, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi providers of system-log-daemon,
when I started packaging rsyslog for Debian I based /etc/rsyslog.conf on what's been in /etc/syslog.conf at that time (as provided by the no longer
existing sysklogd).
Unfortunately, this also meant, there was a lot of
21.01.2023 19:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
..
What's the reason to provide these systemd services for busybox-syslogd?
In my view, busybox-syslogd can be used as a minimal syslogging service
on a bare minimal system without much else besides busybox itself.
On a system with systemd, systemd
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:39:00 +0200 "W. Martin Borgert"
wrote:
Package: busybox-syslogd
Version: 1:1.22.0-19
Tags: patch
Please add systemd .service files to busybox-syslogd.
The attached files are taken from OpenEmbedded and
seem to work on my embedded device on
ng mdadm package did not help.
Downgrading busybox-static to 1.35.0-2 fixed the issue.
Now this is interesting. In -3, I included these changes:
commit ac478f88b64d5884d5e81bcd8f8344f0ec72df6a
Author: Michael Tokarev
Date: Mon Oct 17 12:52:23 2022 +0300
deb,static:
Hi!
I uploaded a new busybox release today (mostly non-linux changes,
it now builds on hurd), but thought maybe I should've asked here
before doing that. But it was too late already.
Should I ask the next time?
Thanks,
/mjt
Ok, it's been almost a month since my initial email here.
If there's no objections, I'll upload the new busybox release tomorrow
(from the "mjt" branch). It's enough waiting :)
I want to enable awk applet for d-i (udeb) config before the upload, for
some things it is much easier to use than
19.05.2022 17:23, Philip Hands wrote:
Michael Tokarev writes:
19.05.2022 15:59, Philip Hands wrote:
...
Actually, I'm unable to resist the urge to remove the redundant use of
cat (that was already there), so how about doing it in a single sed:
LEVEL=$(sed "/^${LOCALE%%_*}/"'
19.05.2022 15:59, Philip Hands wrote:
...
Actually, I'm unable to resist the urge to remove the redundant use of
cat (that was already there), so how about doing it in a single sed:
LEVEL=$(sed "/^${LOCALE%%_*}/"'{ print $4 ; exit }'
/usr/share/localechooser/languagelist)
That smells like
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:12:58 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.30.1-6
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org
For busybox-static, I'd love to have the "hush" applet available. It's a
more feature-complete shell, including
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 23:23:51 + Holger Levsen wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.30.1-4
Severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: Russell Weber
submitter: Russell Weber
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 02:43:43PM -0600, Russell Weber wrote:
> Package: busybox
> Version:
Control: tag -1 + upstream
On Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:58:06 + Ben Hutchings wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.27.2-3
Severity: wishlist
Once we have busybox 1.28.0, we could enable these extra applets on
Linux:
ipconfig [CONFIG_IPCONFIG]
nuke [CONFIG_NUKE]
resume
08.05.2022 23:06, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Michael Tokarev (2022-05-08):
The prob is not the burden of maintaining it, I'm okay with that one.
It is just that the whole thing seems wrong :)
Again, I'm definitely not arguing for dropping it right now, but we
either plan to do this some other way
08.05.2022 19:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Michael Tokarev (2022-05-08):
I don't understand what is holding an upload right now, -- the salsa
busybox repository is more than 3 months old now. I think it is ready
for an upload, - I think we should do it and deal with any issues
which may
08.05.2022 18:24, Michael Stone wrote:
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are
Hi!
Quite some years ago I stepped down as a busybox maintainer, in a somewhat
scandalous way even, and the details of that story are now started escaping
my memory. At any rate, I become older, much less touchy than before, and
that time wasn't my easiest period of my life which might have
13.04.2022 09:31, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:13:58AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
No, as far as I understand. B/c udhcpc package lacks the main binary
if there's no busybox... ;)
Can you explain please? :)
Head -> table. I now understand
11.04.2022 15:21, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: busybox
Version: 1:1.30.1-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi Aurelien,
would it be possible to avoid the udhcpc -> busybox dependency? It may
seem strange to remove busybox in a quest to reduce file system usage at
first, but if you need iproute2
22.02.2021 13:00, Simon McVittie wrote:
Control: reassign -1 src:debootstrap 1.0.123
Control: retitle -1 debootstrap: autopkgtest regression under
autopkgtest-virt-qemu
[]
not ok 19 - unshare -m
/tmp/autopkgtest.PYPTQP/build.yxt/src/debian/tests/fake/schroot-1.6.10-3
chroot.d runuser -u
22.01.2020 09:18, Witold Baryluk wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Followup-For: Bug #689528
Dear Maintainer,
any progress on this, I still have this issue.
Out of curiosity, _why_ this is necessary?
For the install time, isn't it trivial to use regular ide/sata cdrom
drive or an usb flash
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.27.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Please enable NBD applet for regular deb configuration. It costs almost
nothing but it is useful for our environment for booting over network.
Thanks!
/mjt
16.09.2016 20:51, Ben Hutchings wrote:
We should install a minimal NTP client by default. Not ntp, it's far
more complex than needed and (partly as a result of that) has a poor
security record.
Systemd comes with systemd-timesyncd these days, JFYI.
Thanks,
/mjt
Ben.
22.01.2016 01:14, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This series removes the busybox hook script and definition of
> BUSYBOXDIR from initramfs-tools, leaving busybox itself responsible
> for these.
Oh well. How many times I talked with Max on IRC, sent patches,
created a git tree for initramfs to pull
27.10.2015 02:27, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 00:01:18 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Michael, I am not sure I understand what happened: I don't see any
>> recent NMUs for package mdadm, hence I cannot see how d-i developers
>> could "throw your work away".
>>
>> Anyway,
27.10.2015 18:23, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 10:25 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> I'm not maintaining mdadm anymore.
>
> Then why have you not orphaned it?
It is team-maintained (or was), and orphaning it means uploading
it which means I'll have to ask the d-i
05.05.2015 14:55, Michael Lager wrote:
This was an upgrade from debian wheezy to jessie and a report (as requested)
on how it went. I just hope this can be put right for others wishing to
upgrade and finding it doesn't work. My work-around was to create a symbolic
link (result as below)
05.05.2015 21:13, Michael Lager wrote:
I can't remove libusb-1.0-0 package which provides libusb-1.0.so.0 because 93
packages depend on it including gdm3, gnome, cups and many others and that
would render jessie practically useless. The version required by jessie is
given as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
06.03.2015 15:02, Sam Hartman wrote:
[]
So, you're involving the TC because you're hoping to better understand why
your unblock was not approved?
How are you hoping the TC can help? Here are some options I see:
* Some folks on the TC are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
05.03.2015 15:08, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam Hi, Making no comment on the remainder of the mail:
Adam On 2015-03-05 10:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
And since I can't do my work, I'm stepping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I didn't really want to write this email, but it looks I now have to,
even if, for reasons which whill be shown below, don't expect any
good news from this.
Trying to make the story short.
For quite some time we had a bug in glibc in jessie
06.03.2015 02:57, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Package: udhcpd
Version: 1:1.20.0-7
Severity: wishlist
The documentation seems to suggest udhcpd can only handle binding to one
interface and using one IP address range per udhcpd process. Due to
this, it would be handy if Debian's init scripts
04.03.2015 19:10, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Looking at the just uploaded -15, I don't understand what you tried to
do there.
I didn't upload -15, I just tried to clean up what's left
before I retire, and - unintentionally - pushed things to
git.d.o. It was my mistake. More, we have 2 branches,
02.03.2015 19:53, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org (2015-03-02):
[]
I'm slightly confused here. Is 1:1.22.0-9+deb8u1 different from
the upload you mentioned above?
It's basically the same thing as I proposed initially, but with
different changes in the git history
Control: retitle -1 Using mdadm to install Debian on Intel IMSM RAID array
stopped working between Wheezy 7.8 and Jessie RC1
Control: reassign -1 mdadm
Control: tag -1 + help
05.02.2015 17:43, Benjamin Black wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Version: used in Debian GNU/Linux Jessie-DI-rc1
29.01.2015 15:12, Samuel Thibault wrote:
martin f krafft, le Thu 29 Jan 2015 11:52:36 +0100, a écrit :
2. the boot: prompt appears on both, console and serial console,
Nack with my brltty maintainer hat: you don't want to send things on the
serial port without the user saying to do this.
27.01.2015 10:48, Pierre GINDRAUD wrote:
Hello evryone,
I'm not sure that is the best mailing list to expose my problem, but I try
anyway
I've bought recently, an motherboard in order to make a simple server in my
home, the model is a ASROCK Q2900 ITX (see documentation below)
27.01.2015 08:59, Christian PERRIER пишет:
(CC'ed in case you guys subscribed to -release. I am subscribed
so please no CC)
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
So you're continuing to ruin my (hard in this case) work, spreading lies
(invasive) and confirming you're against others
#771852)
+before 3.3.2-3 release). (Closes: #764036, #771852)
* mention closing of #588965 #599352 #694513 by 3.3-1
-- Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:29:22 +0300
@@ -84,7 +96,7 @@
mdadm (3.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Michael Tokarev ]
- * new upstream 3.3 release
11.12.2014 10:52, Ivo De Decker wrote:
[]
As the libc issue with the static binary seems to be fixed in the libc version
in both jessie and sid, the only remaining issue is the missing build-using,
which can wait till after jessie.
Could you do a new upload with only the security fix?
I'll
11.12.2014 13:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Hello
can you please still push your master branch and tags to the git
repository? Last commit there points to debian/1.22.0-9 which is
5 revisions old, at least if I'm reading cgit and gitk properly.
Oh yeah. I'm sorry about that. Pushed now.
-using. Note that this most
important part - which prompted the original bug
report wrt built-using - is here with proper
value (it is glibc which had bug in several
versions, producing buggy static binaries).
Thanks,
/mjt
28.11.2014 18:33, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Michael
28.11.2014 15:11, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Michael Tokarev wrote:
(The Built-Using field generation is a bit fun here: I asked on IRC
how people identify which libc is in use, and got various somewhat-
incpmplete replies (the prob is that on different arches, libc package
28.11.2014 18:06, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Michael Tokarev wrote:
‣ intimate knowledge of the build system required, so you know
what precidely is pulled in (reading shlibs:Depends from the
build of the shared version is almost certainly wrong)
Why it is wrong
attempt to fix the glibc build-depend for #769190, now
+using versioned build-dependency on libc-dev-bin which is named
+this way on all architectures (unlike libc6|libc6.1|libc0.1|libc0.3)
+
+ -- Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:52:18 +0300
+
+busybox (1:1.22.0-13
27.11.2014 19:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Putting on my d-i RM fedora.)
Thank you for your review.
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru (2014-11-27):
Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix
(CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch,
fixing
BTW, the bug is _not_ fixed by -12 upload where I added a build-dep on libc-bin.
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546396a3.1000...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
12.11.2014 21:05, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[]
And there's nothing I can do about this on busybox side -- except,
again, adding a versioned build-dep.
I'll schedule binNMUs for now, but it might be a good idea to add a
versioned build-dep so that it doesn't happen again.
Please don't. I want
12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Should I list them all in the build-deps? If yes, what's the complete list?
It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha !ia64] | libc6.1-dev [alpha ia64] |
libc0.1-dev ( 2.19-12~) [kfreebsd
13.11.2014 00:03, Michael Tokarev пишет:
12.11.2014 22:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Should I list them all in the build-deps? If yes, what's the complete list?
It should be libc6-dev[linux-any !alpha !ia64] | libc6.1-dev [alpha
-standing lintian error, when package build
+alway produces busybox-syslogd package which is arch:all and should not
+be built on a buildd.
+
+ -- Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:07:34 +0300
+
busybox (1:1.22.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium
* cherry-pick find /BITS patch
11.11.2014 18:08, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Please unblock package busybox. Last upload has one security bugfix
(CVE-2014-4607, #768945), the fix is from upstream stable branch,
fixing an integer overflow in lzo decompressor; it adds a Built-Using
control field for busybox-static variant
12.11.2014 04:35, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Bug nr 768926 is filed against qemu-user-static, and was supposedly fixed
with
busybox version 1.22.0-10
My guess is that that upload was supposed to fix bug nr 768876 and not 768926
Yes, you're exactly right. This is what happens when I do things
12.11.2014 04:27, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-11
Severity: important
This is basically the same error as with bug #757941, but it was
reassigned to glibc and fixed there. As Aurelien Jarno correctly stated
in
Source: busybox
Version: 1:1.22.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: security patch upstream fixed-upstream
Busybox embeds mini-lzo library implementation which suffers
from CVE-2014-4607 -- integer overflow with memory corruption
potential and a risk of (remote) code execution, see
Maybe it is really better to postprone bonding configuration until
past installation? As far as I understand, bonding is entirely
optional and is intended to make network faster and more reliable.
It is not exactly necessary during install, and can be made later.
But more feature makes d-i
31.10.2014 13:42, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:37:24 +
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes.
After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this
{linux-kernel,system}-log-daemon in there (Closes: #730059)
* test for /run/systemd/system in busybox-klogd initscript and exit
if present, to not conflict with systemd klogd functions
* do not pass extra params to dh_installinit (using dep-based ordering)
-- Michael Tokarev m
Control: tag -1 - wontfix
29.09.2014 13:56, Trent W. Buck wrote:
Michael Tokarev wrote:
It is not the init script, it is the busybox syslog implementation.
For simplicity, it is one applet that does both syslog function and
klogd function, and klogd function is not optional.
Er, are you
[Rehashing a somewhat old thread...]
08.08.2014 14:55, Zimmermann, Alexander wrote:
So here is the full output. Vanilla Linux 3.16. No patches. There is
definitely something
broken in the userland. I will set up a new image via debootstrap next week.
So, Alexander, did you succeed in finding
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
11.09.2014 09:49, Trent W. Buck wrote:
In fact busybox-syslogd is the *only* package with
Provides: klogd
the others seem to
Provides: linux-kernel-log-daemon
I don't understand why this is the case.
Does the difference signify a different interface,
Package: partman-md
Version: 70
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
finish-install.d/65partman-md reads:
CF=/target/etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
if ... then
mkdir -p /target/etc/mdadm
echo # Autogenerated by partman-md. See mdadm.conf(5) for more details
on this file. /etc/mdadm.conf
21.09.2014 17:19, Diederik de Haas wrote:
On Tuesday 12 August 2014 21:46:43 Michael Tokarev wrote:
Nope. This is getaddrinfo() function. So it is glibc, not gcc or
optimization.
getaddrinfo() does not work in jessie glibc when linked statically.
It immediately returns Name or service
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
12.08.2014 19:30, Diederik de Haas wrote:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-8
Severity: important
When trying to ping an address, like debian.org, with busybox-static you
get a ping: bad address 'debian.org' error.
Yes, this is what we have. Current
12.08.2014 21:16, Michael Tokarev wrote:
jessie does not work. Also, it is specific to amd64 arch, it does not
happen on i386 (from 2 variants of x86 arches).
No, i386 jessie does not work too. It was a very old jessie32 chroot here
where I tried to build it and it worked. So it looks like
12.08.2014 21:34, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Smells like a possible compiler optimization bug? (The relevant code
might be buggy and falling into undefined behaviour; meaning not a
compiler bug.) Should be easy to check by building at -O0.
Nope. This is getaddrinfo() function. So it is glibc,
07.08.2014 10:35, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Please do not make the default for beginners making the whole disk one
big partition anymore.
Just leave a little free space just in case...
How much is a little ?
You never know when they might need to tune their
05.08.2014 17:36, Zimmermann, Alexander wrote:
Despite the fact that I was unable to write a proper wrapper :-) - the kernel
crashes -
I know now that neither busybox nor AUFS is the culprit. See below:
Um. The wrapper should be something like:
#! /bin/sh
echo mounts before-init:
mount
01.08.2014 15:37, Zimmermann, Alexander wrote:
As you can see, we use a vanilla 3.14 Kernel, patched w/ official AUFS patch
(see
http://aufs.sourceforge.net)
I too use aufs here, for a very long time. But I never tried
nfs-root together with aufs, I used if in slightly different
scenarios.
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
31.07.2014 11:56, Zimmermann, Alexander wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.22.0-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
we have a PXE environments in our lab, where we boot both physical boxes
and XEN machines via NFS from one centralized Debian SID image.
18.04.2014 00:21, Иван Сусанин wrote:
[]
I've already reopened original udchpc bug at busybox bugtracker
(https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=3979), but it looks like I'm asking
for a miracle...
I've seen that discussion. And frankly, I strongly support Denis here.
We've a
01.03.2014 06:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.20.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
the title and the attached patch say it all.
Oh well.
This come several times in the past for various packages, and it always
ends up in some strange place.
I always build my
Control: tag -1 + pending
01.03.2014 12:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
01.03.2014 06:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.20.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
the title and the attached patch say it all.
Oh well.
This come several times in the past for various
13.02.2014 20:45, Phillip Susi wrote:
Package: partman-partitioning
Tags: patch
This patch removes the copy operation from the partman menu in
preparation for the parted3 transition, which no longer supports this.
Out of curiocity, why libparted is needed to copy a partition
into some
28.01.2014 00:51, Ian Campbell wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.22.0-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The zcat applet seems to behave like cat unless the input file has a .gz
suffix:
Given two identical files (compressed string Hello World), one with a .gz
24.01.2014 18:41, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) пишет:
Package: busybox-static
Version: 1:1.22.0-1
Severity: important
busybox-static 1:1.22.0-1 makes initrd.img unbootable.
boot stopped with below message.
-
/init: exec: line 331: switch_root: not found
-
This is because in order
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
17.08.2013 19:31, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Source: busybox
Version: 1:1.20.0-8.1
Severity: important
From my pbuilder build log, using a chroot with make 3.82-1 from experimental
installed:
...
GEN libbb/Kbuild
GEN libbb/Config.in
Control: tag -1 + wontfix moreinfo - patch
14.10.2013 14:45, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
severity 726298 wishlist
retitle 726298 Give guidance to console-switching installer users
reassign 726298 busybox
tags 726298 + patch
thanks
It's all my fault. I just realized that X is fine, I just didn't
[Replying to oldish email]
28.08.2013 20:30, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Joseph M. Deming, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 12:06:06 -0400, a écrit :
busybox fails to install due to dependency on libperl packages which then
depend on perlapi-5.14.2.
We're at the beginning of a perl transition. Packages need
14.07.2013 18:22, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Samstag, 13. Juli 2013, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Heh. And this is exactly why I closed it: users don't need the
new version. I especially asked Jackson which features or bugfixes
he needs. He replied with a link to a changelog, which makes me
think
13.07.2013 13:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Michael,
exactly why did you close the bug?
Because it serves no (additional) purpose (we have a watch file
for that already) except of cluttering buglist (which is already
quite long) even more, making it more unreadable. I will most
likely forget
I forgot to address another comment.
13.07.2013 13:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
And, did you even read the list of changes?
Oh yes I did.
But I'm *still* waiting for the wheezy update, which
went unanswered for half a year now.
Let me quote it for you:
Thank you very much, much apprecated - I
13.07.2013 17:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Samstag, 13. Juli 2013, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Because it serves no (additional) purpose (we have a watch file
for that already) except of cluttering buglist (which is already
it does serve a purpose: to express+document users needs
13.07.2013 03:18, Jackson Doak wrote:
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.20.0-8.1
The current debian version of busybox (1:1.20.0-8.1) is outdated,
Outdated how? What features or bugfixes are missing in current
version for you?
please update to the current upstream version (1.21.1). It can be
02.06.2013 14:25, Aron Xu wrote:
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for busybox (versioned as 1:1.20.0-8.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I'm still waiting for the stable updates for busybox which is
currently in testing, see
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
