Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) Colin et al, any chance this can make it to Squeeze point release? It's the last non-DI package in Arno's list. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxm39md3r8pd_lhyagmpb2fhxcegxwmgnuipim+yahv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) 635398 -- partman-base -- humandev() support for ZFS volumes 637032 -- partman-target -- please allow /lib/modules mount points 635627 -- zfsutils -- zvol (ZFS volumes) should be available before checkroot.sh none -- partman-zfs -- Use a version 8 for volume management Another one: #635991 -- partman-basicfilesystems -- set swap flag for ZVOL swap instead of adding it to fstab -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxnk9bc-wvrxa4juj-ptmp9_wkkt68ku10h2yhehaah...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) Colin et al, any chance this can make it to Squeeze point release? It's the last non-DI package in Arno's list. If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included? Might it not make more sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317488903.2999.62.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [Parted-maintainers] Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:08, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) Colin et al, any chance this can make it to Squeeze point release? It's the last non-DI package in Arno's list. If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included? Might it not make more sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4? For me, 6.0.4 seems more realistic as all that wouldn't need to be done in a rush. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpmfsq0rcxhrkxtqo_dr8t34oxrsjp2bf1o1xdoqpy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 23:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included? I didn't know if D-I followed the same release cycle. Given your reply, now I assume it does. d-i _in stable_ does, yes. The only time anything in stable changes is in a point release. (The udeb packages might get uploaded to proposed-updates in between, but there's no installer release that would be built to use them, afaik). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317503579.2999.73.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included? I didn't know if D-I followed the same release cycle. Given your reply, now I assume it does. Might it not make more sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4? Sure, we can get back to this later. Thanks -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXN9a8royOFFOTgzhPxppX9R2n+bX=v+3s4h5wr9o09...@mail.gmail.com
Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone (please keep CCs:), on behalf of the kreebsd porters I am trying to explore our possibilities to improve ZFS (installer) support in a future Squeeze point release. To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) 635398 -- partman-base -- humandev() support for ZFS volumes 637032 -- partman-target -- please allow /lib/modules mount points 635627 -- zfsutils -- zvol (ZFS volumes) should be available before checkroot.sh none -- partman-zfs -- Use a version 8 for volume management In agreement with kfreebsd's technology status [1] I think we can consider that possible for packages which are kfreebsd specific only. As you can see, it would also affect packages in Linux, in particular parted and partman (thus d-i). However, we don't expect any side effects on Linux, as it mostly touches paths used by kfreebsd systems only. I hereby request comments from maintainers of affected packages and the release team in particular. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/06/msg00365.html - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOe1AzAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtYecP/RJAt8QO6ckrIxuNx5D/Wwwv l/aTyy+TQL02oV1dVkQbUwSKFvJAuQegxCvSu1cBbOxZrYL/vuxHgX+W6S/HxVwV 1poDDLqZgdUmmiEwAT0Ny5u1he+MGeJ6EsPYblX3Ul2qRIE4aV0fxvogQX/0cXPt 6dBPNsfgplWKm7plAWx3vOmJ8wzqO5wQJgHgYA9DQ6X17awY2sq+6NPMiOJStx2q iW2Wln1GI/9dY3v4mRlW+luOF3+Awad0DtKoYfzQ0p4MpjtIe/D4OHRiDErzAqPr TUO5yHnNKOkePbEXOtsdPMxwD6cK+LhGEm4eT1WD7WtJ7DUG6ljwRxImWIhxBrAD 3C7QVbl72jJPTEnpVKrt5kWuaM7Tbi2JLeVmUa0/xbvMOkx0w50XCFjMS75lK/M0 5u72pi4K5UKknwUgkl09ePw+xRrQSmAZUdwfyJGnFG7uOfwniCTTq0v3whRsz0WR Wz5cVmQKNxDm/qTdOX3kvQPKNsG10+5fk9CWOE4Gjr0+vEiBiKUfLf57q8w/5o3g 4UpDUOLnWf2fr38ROwbRcUzXx8w66Fz8dvdnJq2f2MKExnETXzot6Dp8IdD3VEre e/e2cZyvGGjVz/szTRra3wp8HDtQvcEtY5Kfam8H/oBRjjm1nGNjNiY8kqtQOAgu Yc+V4ZNSJqSfSFzRhMjz =hV9l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7b5034.2060...@toell.net
