Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug #  -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) Colin et al, any chance this

Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: Bug #  -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) 635398 -- partman-base -- humandev() support for ZFS volumes 637032 -- partman-target -- please allow /lib/modules mount points 635627 -- zfsutils -- zvol (ZFS volumes) should

Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted --

Re: [Parted-maintainers] Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:08, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on

Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 23:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be

Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-10-01 Thread Robert Millan
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included? I didn't know if D-I followed the same release cycle.

Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd

2011-09-22 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone (please keep CCs:), on behalf of the kreebsd porters I am trying to explore our possibilities to improve ZFS (installer) support in a future Squeeze point release. To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug