I understand that. But just like we have a bunch of architectures, we
have a bunch of netboot options. You generally don't have a lot of
choices about what your hardware supports. Telling someone whose card
doesn't support pxe to use pxe because it's better is no more sensible
than
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 12:45:05PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
So why does that prevent us from giving an overview of the various
options and providing some criteria to help users pick one or the
other?
It doesn't; that would be very good. I thought I had read that the goal
was to eliminate all
Le ven 03/01/2003 à 02:37, Chris Tillman a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:33:36PM +0100, nb wrote:
Le jeu 02/01/2003 à 06:25, Chris Tillman a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:50:56PM +0100, nb wrote:
192.168.1.255 would be better
OK, got that.
In chapter 4.5.5 it is said
Le ven 03/01/2003 à 03:37, Adam DiCarlo a écrit :
Chris Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also agree that what I read looked good, but it didn't seem to cover
all of the issues mentioned in the bug, such as coming up with an
overview of the different netboot options and which is best
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 08:48:48PM +0100, nb wrote:
Thanks to Michael R. Schwarzbach and he's post I finally can install
debian via tftp. I think the need is going growing to do that and it's
really time to update documentation.
I've spent 24 hours to do that and sentences like NOT YET
Le jeu 02/01/2003 à 06:25, Chris Tillman a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:50:56PM +0100, nb wrote:
PXE is the most natural method in the sens that it doesn't need any
supplementary media.
It's the one everyone can use on a real diskless machine.
It finally worked for me and her's what
Le jeu 02/01/2003 à 20:43, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 08:48:48PM +0100, nb wrote:
Thanks to Michael R. Schwarzbach and he's post I finally can install
debian via tftp. I think the need is going growing to do that and it's
really time to update documentation.
I've
I also agree that what I read looked good, but it didn't seem to cover
all of the issues mentioned in the bug, such as coming up with an
overview of the different netboot options and which is best to use...
--
...Adam Di Carlo..[EMAIL PROTECTED]...URL:http://www.onshored.com/
--
To
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 04:40:50PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
overview of the different netboot options and which is best to use...
The one that works. You're asking for something like review the
currently supported architectures and explain which is the best one to
use.
Mike Stone
--
To
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:33:36PM +0100, nb wrote:
Le jeu 02/01/2003 à 06:25, Chris Tillman a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:50:56PM +0100, nb wrote:
192.168.1.255 would be better
OK, got that.
In chapter 4.5.5 it is said that the TFTP client will look for is
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 04:40:50PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
I also agree that what I read looked good, but it didn't seem to cover
all of the issues mentioned in the bug, such as coming up with an
overview of the different netboot options and which is best to use...
--
...Adam Di
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 04:40:50PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
overview of the different netboot options and which is best to use...
The one that works. You're asking for something like review the
currently supported architectures and explain which is
Chris Tillman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I also agree that what I read looked good, but it didn't seem to cover
all of the issues mentioned in the bug, such as coming up with an
overview of the different netboot options and which is best to use...
Yes, and I don't have a clue about that.
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 08:36:11PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
Um, no, I'm just talking about netboot options on i386.
I understand that. But just like we have a bunch of architectures, we
have a bunch of netboot options. You generally don't have a lot of
choices about what your hardware
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:50:56PM +0100, nb wrote:
PXE is the most natural method in the sens that it doesn't need any
supplementary media.
It's the one everyone can use on a real diskless machine.
It finally worked for me and her's what I've done for that.
See what you think of the
PXE is the most natural method in the sens that it doesn't need any
supplementary media.
It's the one everyone can use on a real diskless machine.
It finally worked for me and her's what I've done for that.
What is PXE ?
PXE (Pre-boot Execution Environment) is a protocol designed by Intel
that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 140579 i386 tftpboot undocumenteed
Bug#140579: boot-floppies: [i386] boot-floppies 3.0.21 fail to load root.bin via tftp
Changed Bug title.
tags 140579 - patch
Bug#140579: i386 tftpboot undocumenteed
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
retitle 140579 i386 tftpboot undocumenteed
tags 140579 - patch
reassign 140579 install-doc
thanks
Thanks for your contributions and documentation. We'll do our best to
integrate this, and let you know when the install manual is ready for
review.
--
...Adam Di Carlo..[EMAIL
Le dim 29/12/2002 à 22:07, Adam DiCarlo a écrit :
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to Michael R. Schwarzbach and he's post I finally can install
debian via tftp. I think the need is going growing to do that and
it's really time to update documentation.
Can you identify for us
Please retain the CC to the bugs.debian.org addresss.
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le dim 29/12/2002 à 22:07, Adam DiCarlo a écrit :
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to Michael R. Schwarzbach and he's post I finally can install
debian via tftp. I think the need is going growing
Le lun 30/12/2002 à 18:47, Adam DiCarlo a écrit :
it's really time to update documentation.
Can you identify for us exactly what sections in the latest install
manual are wrong, and which information is completely missing?
This is missing :
1/ different boot methods are
Is it just me, or isn't it rather a crippling problem that etherboot
requires a floppy or other bootable medium to do the etherbooting? I
guess however, since there is no OpenBoot on x86, that's just the
breaks.
Tell me, why is it interesting/useful to floppy-boot into etherboot
rather than
Le lun 30/12/2002 à 22:16, Adam DiCarlo a écrit :
Is it just me, or isn't it rather a crippling problem that etherboot
requires a floppy or other bootable medium to do the etherbooting? I
guess however, since there is no OpenBoot on x86, that's just the
breaks.
I'm not sure I've understood
Thanks to Michael R. Schwarzbach and he's post I finally can install
debian via tftp. I think the need is going growing to do that and it's
really time to update documentation.
I've spent 24 hours to do that and sentences like NOT YET WRITTEN are
not acceptable today.
I hope this will go better.
nb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to Michael R. Schwarzbach and he's post I finally can install
debian via tftp. I think the need is going growing to do that and
it's really time to update documentation.
Can you identify for us exactly what sections in the latest install
manual are wrong,
Hi,
it seems nobody ever reported a successfull install with tftpboot.img.
Here's how I did it:
1. From .../woody/main/disks-i386/3.0.23-2002-05-21, I got the files
compact/tftpboot.img
images-1.44/root.bin
2. On my DHCP server, I installed the mknbi package and created an
26 matches
Mail list logo
