On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the
raid flag to partitions. Severity set to `serious' from `important'
I don't agree that this issue
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 12:25, you wrote:
Separately, I feel that md support is important enough to enough users
that I would not be comfortable releasing an installer with etch that
couldn't handle software raid at install time; I imagine you would
agree that if this happened to the
severity 397973 important
thanks
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the
raid flag to partitions. Severity set to `serious' from `important'
I don't agree that this issue is RC. It does not match any
severity 397973 serious
# 12:18 vorlon fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID install
# should be considered RC these days, do you disagree?
thanks
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 03:08:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 10:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 397973 serious
Bug#397973: [powerpci/mac] partman-md appears to not write back the raid flag
to partitions.
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
# 12:18 vorlon fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID install
# should be
On Friday 12 January 2007 17:58, Sven Luther wrote:
12:18 vorlon fjp: I would think that not being able to do a RAID
install should be considered RC these days, do you disagree?
What else is there to say ...
I am not going to fight this war, but I also refuse to treat this BR as RC
for the
6 matches
Mail list logo