On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 23:12 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
verify earlier than that).
What's the status of that upload?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
2011/10/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 07:20:50 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Attached patch should fix the problem. I can upload a fixed
kfreebsd-8 this evening (feel free to NMU if someone has time to
verify earlier than that).
What's the status of that
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:20:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable]
I think in the worst case we can just keep the current (as in
non-point release version) of d-i on kfreebsd-* for the next point
release and don't update to the binNMU. It's actually from
2011/10/6 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org:
That said, this needs to be fixed, and we're all not very happy, given
the fact that we actually did ask before if something changes in the
udeb output.
I have to say in my defense that I did check for changes in udeb
output. However these changes
5 matches
Mail list logo
